Healthcare · head to head
Halaxy vs VIA Veterinary

Halaxy
Healthcare
Practice management for allied health that charges nothing for the software and earns on payments
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

VIA Veterinary
Veterinary
Medically oriented veterinary practice management, now owned by Antech and Mars Veterinary Health
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Halaxy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Halaxy the software being free does not mean the platform is cheap: a clinic taking most payments by card pays roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus a fixed fee on every transaction, which on a high volume practice comfortably exceeds what a flat AUD 60 per practitioner subscription would have cost.; VIA Veterinary the vendor is owned by Mars Veterinary Health through Antech, the same group that owns Antech Diagnostics, Banfield and VCA, so a practice is buying its record system from its diagnostics supplier and its competitor in the consolidation market.
- They diverge on capability: Halaxy covers No licence fee, VIA Veterinary covers Clinical flowsheets.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Halaxy and VIA Veterinary actually diverge.
| Attribute | Halaxy | VIA Veterinary |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Free software, revenue taken on payments and credits | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, Web, iPadOS |
| Category | Healthcare | Veterinary |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Halaxy
- No licence fee
- Integrated claiming
- Credit-based extras
- Online booking
- Clinical notes and templates
- Card payments
- Multi-practitioner diary
- Patient portal
Only in VIA Veterinary
- Clinical flowsheets
- Integrated SOAP
- DICOM imaging
- Laboratory results
- VIA Cloud
- VIA Touch
- Multi-site
- Open standards integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Halaxy
- A solo psychologist starting out who wants Medicare and private health claiming without committing to a monthly subscription before there is any incomenot VIA Veterinary
- A physiotherapy clinic that wants patient reminders, online booking and card payments reconciled against invoices in one systemnot VIA Veterinary
- An NDIS provider that needs claim generation and service agreement tracking built into the same record as clinical notesnot VIA Veterinary
- A multi-location allied health group in Australia that wants one diary across sites without paying per practitioner licencesnot VIA Veterinary
VIA Veterinary
- An emergency and critical care hospital that runs on treatment flowsheets and a live whiteboard rather than an appointment calendarnot Halaxy
- A multi-doctor specialty referral practice needing DICOM imaging and lab results inside the medical recordnot Halaxy
- A practice already committed to Antech diagnostics that wants first-party laboratory and imaging integrationnot Halaxy
- A multi-site hospital group consolidating separate practice management installations onto one systemnot Halaxy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Halaxy
- The software being free does not mean the platform is cheap: a clinic taking most payments by card pays roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus a fixed fee on every transaction, which on a high volume practice comfortably exceeds what a flat AUD 60 per practitioner subscription would have cost.
- Credits are prepaid and consumed by ordinary daily activity including SMS reminders and Medicare claims, so running out mid-week silently stops reminders going to patients, which shows up as no-shows rather than as an error message.
- Features that competitors treat as standard, including two-way calendar sync, API access and a dedicated SMS number, are locked behind the credit subscription, so the headline free tier is thinner than it first appears.
- Claiming, funding and payment integrations are deeply Australian, so practitioners in the UK, Canada or the United States get the diary and notes but very little of the automation that makes the product worth choosing.
- Because the vendor earns on payment volume, its interests and yours diverge on card processing: switching to a cheaper acquirer breaks the automatic reconciliation that is the main operational reason to stay on the platform.
VIA Veterinary
- The vendor is owned by Mars Veterinary Health through Antech, the same group that owns Antech Diagnostics, Banfield and VCA, so a practice is buying its record system from its diagnostics supplier and its competitor in the consolidation market.
- No pricing is published at all, so licence, implementation, conversion, hardware and support costs all arrive through a sales process and cannot be compared against alternatives before you engage.
- It remains substantially a Windows on-premises product with a cloud option layered on, so hardware, network and backup remain your operational problem in the traditional deployment.
- Integration depth with IDEXX diagnostics is the obvious risk given the ownership, and a practice with in-house IDEXX analysers should test that path explicitly rather than assume parity with Antech.
- The clinical emphasis means front-of-house and client engagement features, including online booking and marketing automation, tend to arrive through third-party integrations rather than natively.
Pricing, plan by plan
Halaxy
Free- HalaxyFree
- Unlimited practitioners with no subscription fee
- Diary, patient records, clinical notes and invoicing
- Online booking page
- Premium subscription$25/month
- Priced at 25 credits per month, so roughly AUD 4 to 6 depending on credit rate
- Two-way calendar sync
- White-label branding
VIA Veterinary
On request- VIA Veterinary$undefined/year
- Pricing available only through a sales process
- On-premises or VIA Cloud deployment
- Implementation, data conversion and training quoted per hospital
Which should you pick?
Choose Halaxy if
- You need no licence fee.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want integrated claiming.
Choose VIA Veterinary if
- You need clinical flowsheets.
- You work on Windows, Web, iPadOS.
- You also want integrated soap.
Questions people ask
- Is Halaxy or VIA Veterinary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Halaxy starts at Free and VIA Veterinary at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Halaxy or VIA Veterinary?
- Halaxy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Halaxy and On request for VIA Veterinary.
- Does Halaxy or VIA Veterinary run on more platforms?
- Halaxy runs on Web, iOS, Android. VIA Veterinary runs on Windows, Web, iPadOS.
- Can I use Halaxy for free?
- Yes. Halaxy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. VIA Veterinary starts at On request.
- What is Halaxy best used for?
- Halaxy is most often used for a solo psychologist starting out who wants medicare and private health claiming without committing to a monthly subscription before there is any income, a physiotherapy clinic that wants patient reminders, online booking and card payments reconciled against invoices in one system, an ndis provider that needs claim generation and service agreement tracking built into the same record as clinical notes, a multi-location allied health group in australia that wants one diary across sites without paying per practitioner licences. Of those, a solo psychologist starting out who wants medicare and private health claiming without committing to a monthly subscription before there is any income and a physiotherapy clinic that wants patient reminders, online booking and card payments reconciled against invoices in one system are not what VIA Veterinary is typically brought in for.
- What can Halaxy do that VIA Veterinary cannot?
- Halaxy covers No licence fee, Integrated claiming, Credit-based extras, Online booking. VIA Veterinary covers Clinical flowsheets, Integrated SOAP, DICOM imaging, Laboratory results.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Halaxy: Is Halaxy genuinely free or is there a hidden subscription?
The core practice management software has no subscription fee for any number of practitioners. Halaxy earns from card processing fees, prepaid credits for SMS and claiming, and an optional premium subscription priced at 25 credits a month.
VIA Veterinary: Who owns VIA?
VIA Information Systems is an Antech company and part of Mars Veterinary Health, the group that also owns Antech Diagnostics, Banfield and VCA.
Halaxy: What does it actually cost a busy clinic?
Budget for card fees of roughly 1.5 to 1.9 per cent plus 75 cents to a dollar per transaction, plus credits at about AUD 0.15 to 0.22 each for every SMS, claim and telehealth session. A clinic with heavy card volume can pay more in total than a flat-rate competitor.
VIA Veterinary: Is pricing published?
No. Licence, implementation, conversion and support costs come only through a sales process.
Halaxy: Can I use it outside Australia?
Yes for the diary, notes, invoicing and booking. No for Medicare, DVA, NDIS and Australian health fund claiming, which is where most of the value sits.
VIA Veterinary: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, VIA Cloud is offered alongside traditional on-premises installation, with cloud backup included.
Halaxy: Does it handle NDIS?
Yes, including NDIS claim generation, service agreements and plan management alongside clinical records.
VIA Veterinary: What kind of practice is it built for?
Medically intensive practices: emergency, specialty, referral, equine and multi-doctor small animal hospitals where flowsheets and whiteboards drive the day.
Related pages
More on VIA Veterinary
Other head to heads
- Halaxy vs Jane App
- Halaxy vs SimplePractice
- Halaxy vs Cliniko
- Halaxy vs Nookal
- Halaxy vs Zanda Health
- Halaxy vs Athenahealth
- Halaxy vs NextGen Healthcare
- Halaxy vs DrChrono
- Halaxy vs WebPT
- Halaxy vs Dentrix
- Halaxy vs Kareo Clinical
- Halaxy vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Halaxy vs Doctor on Demand
- Halaxy vs Doxy.me
- Halaxy vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Halaxy vs Ginger
- Halaxy vs Koa Health
- Halaxy vs OpenMRS
- Halaxy vs ezyVet
- Halaxy vs Provet Cloud
- Halaxy vs Vetspire
- Halaxy vs RxWorks
- Halaxy vs Animana
- Halaxy vs Onward Vet
- Halaxy vs Instinct Science
- Halaxy vs IDEXX Neo
- Halaxy vs Shepherd
- Halaxy vs PetDesk
- Halaxy vs Talkatoo
- Halaxy vs VetBadger
- Halaxy vs VisionVPM
- Halaxy vs Vet Radar
- Halaxy vs ImproMed
- Halaxy vs Covetrus Pulse
- VIA Veterinary vs Jane App
- VIA Veterinary vs SimplePractice
- VIA Veterinary vs Cliniko
- VIA Veterinary vs Nookal
- VIA Veterinary vs Zanda Health
- VIA Veterinary vs Athenahealth
- VIA Veterinary vs NextGen Healthcare
- VIA Veterinary vs DrChrono
- VIA Veterinary vs WebPT
- VIA Veterinary vs Dentrix
- VIA Veterinary vs Kareo Clinical
- VIA Veterinary vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- VIA Veterinary vs Doctor on Demand
- VIA Veterinary vs Doxy.me
- VIA Veterinary vs Fujifilm Synapse
- VIA Veterinary vs Ginger
- VIA Veterinary vs Koa Health
- VIA Veterinary vs OpenMRS
- VIA Veterinary vs ezyVet
- VIA Veterinary vs Provet Cloud
- VIA Veterinary vs Vetspire
- VIA Veterinary vs RxWorks
- VIA Veterinary vs Animana
- VIA Veterinary vs Onward Vet
- VIA Veterinary vs Instinct Science
- VIA Veterinary vs IDEXX Neo
- VIA Veterinary vs Shepherd
- VIA Veterinary vs PetDesk
- VIA Veterinary vs Talkatoo
- VIA Veterinary vs VetBadger
- VIA Veterinary vs VisionVPM
- VIA Veterinary vs Vet Radar
- VIA Veterinary vs ImproMed
- VIA Veterinary vs Covetrus Pulse
