Softwr

Technology · head to head

Greenhouse vs ZipRecruiter

Greenhouse logo

Greenhouse

Technology

Hiring software for growing companies

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
ZipRecruiter logo

ZipRecruiter

Recruitment

Job posting and applicant matching platform priced per job slot, quoted individually per employer

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; ZipRecruiter no rate card is published anywhere, so an employer has no way to benchmark whether its quote is competitive without seeking independent estimates or comparing notes with peers.
  • They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, ZipRecruiter covers Multi-board distribution.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and ZipRecruiter actually diverge.

Attributes where Greenhouse and ZipRecruiter differ
AttributeGreenhouseZipRecruiter
Pricing modelquotePer active job slot per month, quoted individually
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb, iOS, Android
CategoryTechnologyRecruitment
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking
  • Interview scheduling
  • Scorecard system
  • Job board posting
  • Candidate CRM
  • Reporting & analytics
  • Offer management
  • EEO compliance

Only in ZipRecruiter

  • Multi-board distribution
  • AI candidate matching
  • Resume database access
  • Applicant tracking basics
  • Mobile employer app
  • Sponsored job boosting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Greenhouse

  • Enterprise hiring and recruiting automationnot ZipRecruiter
  • Multi-location and multi-team talent acquisitionnot ZipRecruiter
  • Structured interview process managementnot ZipRecruiter

ZipRecruiter

  • A small or mid-sized employer with a handful of concurrent open roles wanting broad job board distribution from one postingnot Greenhouse
  • A hiring manager without a full ATS wanting basic pipeline and messaging tools alongside job distributionnot Greenhouse
  • A company that wants to proactively search a resume database rather than only waiting for applicantsnot Greenhouse
  • An employer comparing per-slot job board spend against a flat-fee ATS subscription for a similar hiring volumenot Greenhouse

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Greenhouse

  • Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
  • Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
  • Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
  • Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
  • Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
  • Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox

ZipRecruiter

  • No rate card is published anywhere, so an employer has no way to benchmark whether its quote is competitive without seeking independent estimates or comparing notes with peers.
  • Cost is charged per active job slot, so an employer with several concurrent openings pays multiplicatively, and pausing then reopening roles can reset pricing negotiations.
  • It is not a full applicant tracking system, so companies with more than lightweight pipeline needs typically still run a separate ATS alongside it, adding integration overhead.
  • Quotes reportedly vary significantly by industry competitiveness and geography, so cost predictability across a multi-location or multi-department hiring plan is poor.
  • Candidate quality and match relevance depend heavily on how well the AI matching interprets a job description, and poorly written postings can under-perform without an obvious signal why.

Pricing, plan by plan

Greenhouse

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.

ZipRecruiter

On request
  • Standard$undefined/month
    • Priced per active job slot, quoted by industry, location and company size
    • Job distribution across the ZipRecruiter network
    • Basic applicant tracking and messaging
  • Premium$undefined/month
    • Priced per active job slot, quoted individually
    • Expanded resume database access and search
    • Enhanced candidate reach and visibility
  • Pro$undefined/month
    • Priced per active job slot, quoted individually
    • Highest visibility and matching priority
    • Dedicated account support

Which should you pick?

Choose Greenhouse if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want interview scheduling.
Greenhouse review

Choose ZipRecruiter if

  • You need multi-board distribution.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want ai candidate matching.
ZipRecruiter review

Questions people ask

Is Greenhouse or ZipRecruiter better?
Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and ZipRecruiter at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or ZipRecruiter?
Greenhouse starts at On request and ZipRecruiter at On request.
Does Greenhouse or ZipRecruiter run on more platforms?
Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. ZipRecruiter runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Greenhouse best used for?
Greenhouse is most often used for enterprise hiring and recruiting automation, multi-location and multi-team talent acquisition, structured interview process management. Of those, enterprise hiring and recruiting automation and multi-location and multi-team talent acquisition are not what ZipRecruiter is typically brought in for.
What can Greenhouse do that ZipRecruiter cannot?
Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. ZipRecruiter covers Multi-board distribution, AI candidate matching, Resume database access, Applicant tracking basics.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Greenhouse: How much does Greenhouse cost?

Greenhouse does not publish specific pricing. The company states that pricing is customized based on your hiring needs, hiring volume, organizational complexity, and required features.

Source
ZipRecruiter: How much does ZipRecruiter cost?

It is not published. Pricing is a monthly subscription per active job slot, quoted individually by industry, location, company size and hiring volume.

Greenhouse: What are the Greenhouse pricing tiers?

Greenhouse offers three plan levels: Core (basic hiring structure), Plus (multi-location optimization), and Pro (complex enterprise hiring). Exact pricing requires contacting Greenhouse for a custom quote.

Source
ZipRecruiter: Is ZipRecruiter a full ATS replacement?

No. It includes basic pipeline and messaging tools but most employers with real ATS needs run a separate system alongside it.

Greenhouse: Do all Greenhouse tiers include the same features?

No. Core includes sourcing and scheduling, Plus adds automation and texting, and Pro adds enterprise data configuration and audit logs. All tiers can be customized.

Source
ZipRecruiter: Can I post one job without a subscription?

Historically ZipRecruiter has offered pay-per-job or trial options in some markets, but its main employer product is a recurring per-slot subscription.

Share

Related pages

More on Greenhouse

More on ZipRecruiter

Keep looking

Other head to heads