Technology · head to head
Greenhouse vs Workable

Workable
Recruitment & ATS
Recruitment and employee engagement platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Workable has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; Workable the Standard plan is $299 a month and still charges separately for texting at $89, video interviews at $109 and assessments at $59 a month
- They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Interview scheduling, Workable covers Job posting.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and Workable actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greenhouse | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | usage-based |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web |
| Category | Technology | Recruitment & ATS |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), founded (2012).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greenhouse
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Only in Workable
- Job posting
- Candidate management
- Onboarding
- Employee engagement
- Analytics
- Mobile app
- Integrations
- Microsoft Teams
Both cover
- Applicant tracking
- Slack
- BambooHR
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot Workable
- AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot Workable
Workable
- Posting jobs and tracking candidates through an applicant tracking systemnot Greenhouse
- Running structured interviews, assessments and offers in one placenot Greenhouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Workable
- The Standard plan is $299 a month and still charges separately for texting at $89, video interviews at $109 and assessments at $59 a month
- Reaching a plan where those three are included means Premier at $599 a month
- Unlimited active jobs is qualified by a fair usage limit rather than being an actual cap
- AI features run on credits, and credits expire one year from purchase
- Published plan prices cover 1 to 20 employees, so larger headcounts are quoted separately
Pricing, plan by plan
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Workable
Free- FreeFree
- Basic recruitment
- Limited hires
- Basic tracking
- Plus$undefined/month
- Advanced recruitment
- Engagement tools
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need interview scheduling.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want scorecard system.
Choose Workable if
- You need job posting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want candidate management.
Questions people ask
- Is Greenhouse or Workable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and Workable at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Workable?
- Workable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Greenhouse and Free for Workable.
- Does Greenhouse or Workable run on more platforms?
- Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Workable runs on Web.
- Can I use Workable for free?
- Yes. Workable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is Greenhouse best used for?
- Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what Workable is typically brought in for.
- What can Greenhouse do that Workable cannot?
- Greenhouse covers Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting, Candidate CRM. Workable covers Job posting, Candidate management, Onboarding, Employee engagement. Both handle Applicant tracking, Slack, BambooHR.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs PyCharm
- Greenhouse vs Sketch
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Netlify
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Coda
- Greenhouse vs Dashlane
- Greenhouse vs GitHub
- Greenhouse vs Ashby
- Greenhouse vs Rippling
- Greenhouse vs Lever
- Greenhouse vs SmartRecruiters
- Greenhouse vs Oracle HCM Cloud
- Greenhouse vs Factorial
- Greenhouse vs iCIMS
- Greenhouse vs Jobvite
- Greenhouse vs Pilot
- Greenhouse vs SAP SuccessFactors
- Greenhouse vs Breezy HR
- Greenhouse vs Deel
- Greenhouse vs JazzHR
- Greenhouse vs Teamtailor
- Workable vs Asana
- Workable vs ClickUp
- Workable vs Figma
- Workable vs Linear
- Workable vs Monday.com
- Workable vs Notion
- Workable vs Amplitude
- Workable vs Datadog
- Workable vs PostHog
- Workable vs PyCharm
- Workable vs Sketch
- Workable vs Docker
- Workable vs Netlify
- Workable vs Okta
- Workable vs Aha!
- Workable vs Coda
- Workable vs Dashlane
- Workable vs GitHub
- Workable vs Ashby
- Workable vs Rippling
- Workable vs Lever
- Workable vs SmartRecruiters
- Workable vs Oracle HCM Cloud
- Workable vs Factorial
- Workable vs iCIMS
- Workable vs Jobvite
- Workable vs Pilot
- Workable vs SAP SuccessFactors
- Workable vs Breezy HR
- Workable vs Deel
- Workable vs JazzHR
- Workable vs Teamtailor

