Softwr

Technology · head to head

Greenhouse vs JobAdder

Greenhouse logo

Greenhouse

Technology

Hiring software for growing companies

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
JobAdder logo

JobAdder

Recruitment

Recruitment platform for staffing agencies and in-house teams, majority owned by the SEEK job board group

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; JobAdder there is no native pay and bill chain, so contract staffing agencies must buy and integrate a separate timesheet and invoicing system and reconcile two sources of placement data.
  • They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, JobAdder covers Job posting.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and JobAdder actually diverge.

Attributes where Greenhouse and JobAdder differ
AttributeGreenhouseJobAdder
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb, iOS, Android
CategoryTechnologyRecruitment
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking
  • Scorecard system
  • Job board posting
  • Candidate CRM
  • Reporting & analytics
  • Offer management
  • EEO compliance
  • LinkedIn

Only in JobAdder

  • Job posting
  • Candidate management
  • Client and contact CRM
  • Placement tracking
  • Workflow automation
  • Mobile apps
  • Marketplace integrations

Both cover

  • Interview scheduling

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Greenhouse

  • Enterprise hiring and recruiting automationnot JobAdder
  • Multi-location and multi-team talent acquisitionnot JobAdder
  • Structured interview process managementnot JobAdder

JobAdder

  • An Australian or New Zealand agency that lives on SEEK applications and wants the shortest path from board to pipelinenot Greenhouse
  • A recruitment firm that wants consultants productive in days rather than running a multi-month implementationnot Greenhouse
  • An in-house team in APAC that needs agency-grade candidate search without enterprise ATS costnot Greenhouse
  • A consultancy whose recruiters work from client sites and need genuine mobile workflownot Greenhouse

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Greenhouse

  • Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
  • Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
  • Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
  • Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
  • Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
  • Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox

JobAdder

  • There is no native pay and bill chain, so contract staffing agencies must buy and integrate a separate timesheet and invoicing system and reconcile two sources of placement data.
  • The product is strongest inside the SEEK footprint, and buyers in North America or continental Europe get weaker board coverage while paying the same per user rate.
  • Analytics beyond standard activity and placement reporting require an add-on, which turns a competitive headline price into a higher effective one for data-driven agencies.
  • Pricing is per user per month by quote with annual commitment, so agencies with fluctuating consultant headcount carry licences through quiet quarters.
  • Support and product hours run on Australian time, meaning European and American customers frequently wait overnight for a response to anything the documentation does not answer.

Pricing, plan by plan

Greenhouse

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.

JobAdder

On request
  • JobAdder$undefined/year
    • Priced per user per month on annual terms
    • Agency and in-house configurations
    • Job board posting included, board fees separate

Which should you pick?

Choose Greenhouse if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want scorecard system.
Greenhouse review

Choose JobAdder if

  • You need job posting.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want candidate management.
JobAdder review

Questions people ask

Is Greenhouse or JobAdder better?
Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and JobAdder at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or JobAdder?
Greenhouse starts at On request and JobAdder at On request.
Does Greenhouse or JobAdder run on more platforms?
Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. JobAdder runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Greenhouse best used for?
Greenhouse is most often used for enterprise hiring and recruiting automation, multi-location and multi-team talent acquisition, structured interview process management. Of those, enterprise hiring and recruiting automation and multi-location and multi-team talent acquisition are not what JobAdder is typically brought in for.
What can Greenhouse do that JobAdder cannot?
Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Scorecard system, Job board posting, Candidate CRM. JobAdder covers Job posting, Candidate management, Client and contact CRM, Placement tracking. Both handle Interview scheduling.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Greenhouse: How much does Greenhouse cost?

Greenhouse does not publish specific pricing. The company states that pricing is customized based on your hiring needs, hiring volume, organizational complexity, and required features.

Source
JobAdder: Who owns JobAdder?

SEEK, the Australasian job board operator, has held a majority stake since 2016, which is why the SEEK integration is deeper than a normal partnership.

Greenhouse: What are the Greenhouse pricing tiers?

Greenhouse offers three plan levels: Core (basic hiring structure), Plus (multi-location optimization), and Pro (complex enterprise hiring). Exact pricing requires contacting Greenhouse for a custom quote.

Source
JobAdder: Does it handle contractor timesheets and invoicing?

Not natively. It integrates with dedicated pay and bill systems such as Astute Payroll, which adds a second vendor and contract.

Greenhouse: Do all Greenhouse tiers include the same features?

No. Core includes sourcing and scheduling, Plus adds automation and texting, and Pro adds enterprise data configuration and audit logs. All tiers can be customized.

Source
JobAdder: Is it suitable outside Australia?

Yes, and it has a real UK customer base, but board coverage and support hours are calibrated to APAC.

JobAdder: How long is implementation?

Days to a few weeks for most agencies, which is its main advantage over the heavier agency platforms.

Share

Related pages

More on Greenhouse

More on JobAdder

Keep looking

Other head to heads