APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Skopeo

Skopeo
Cloud
Inspect, copy and sign container images without pulling them
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Skopeo single-purpose: it neither builds nor runs images, so it is one tool in a chain rather than a solution
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Skopeo covers Remote inspection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Skopeo actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Skopeo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Linux, macOS |
| Category | APIs | Cloud |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Skopeo
- Remote inspection
- Registry-to-registry copy
- Format conversion
- Image signing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Skopeo
- Schema federationnot Skopeo
- API analytics and monitoringnot Skopeo
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Skopeo
Skopeo
- Promoting images between staging and production registries without a round tripnot GraphQL Apollo
- Inspecting an image’s contents before deciding to deploy itnot GraphQL Apollo
- Mirroring images into an air-gapped or internal registrynot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Skopeo
- Single-purpose: it neither builds nor runs images, so it is one tool in a chain rather than a solution
- Command syntax with transport prefixes such as docker:// is unusual and trips people up initially
- Documentation is sparse compared with the rest of the container ecosystem
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Skopeo
Free- SkopeoFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Skopeo if
- You need remote inspection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS.
- You also want registry-to-registry copy.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Skopeo better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Skopeo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Skopeo?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Skopeo at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Skopeo run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Skopeo runs on Linux, macOS.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Skopeo is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Skopeo cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Skopeo covers Remote inspection, Registry-to-registry copy, Format conversion, Image signing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceSkopeo: Is Skopeo free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceSkopeo: Why copy images without pulling them?
A registry-to-registry copy avoids downloading and re-uploading gigabytes, which is faster and much cheaper on bandwidth in CI.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceSkopeo: Can Skopeo run containers?
No. It only inspects, copies, signs and deletes images. Running them is Podman’s or Docker’s job.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Portworx
- GraphQL Apollo vs minikube
- GraphQL Apollo vs Packer
- GraphQL Apollo vs Porter
- GraphQL Apollo vs Zeabur
- GraphQL Apollo vs Pulumi
- GraphQL Apollo vs Caddy
- GraphQL Apollo vs K3s
- GraphQL Apollo vs IBM Cloud
- GraphQL Apollo vs Koyeb
- GraphQL Apollo vs Microsoft Azure
- GraphQL Apollo vs containerd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Vagrant
- GraphQL Apollo vs Rancher
- GraphQL Apollo vs Flux
- GraphQL Apollo vs kind
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kustomize
- GraphQL Apollo vs Linkerd
- Skopeo vs Hasura
- Skopeo vs Appwrite
- Skopeo vs PocketBase
- Skopeo vs Sanity
- Skopeo vs Strapi
- Skopeo vs GraphQL Playground
- Skopeo vs Kong Gateway
- Skopeo vs Parse Server
- Skopeo vs WSO2 API Manager
- Skopeo vs Janus Gateway
- Skopeo vs Directus
- Skopeo vs KeystoneJS
- Skopeo vs Solaris
- Skopeo vs Stainless
- Skopeo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Skopeo vs Thredd
- Skopeo vs Thunder Client
- Skopeo vs Portworx
- Skopeo vs minikube
- Skopeo vs Packer
- Skopeo vs Porter
- Skopeo vs Zeabur
- Skopeo vs Pulumi
- Skopeo vs Caddy
- Skopeo vs K3s
- Skopeo vs IBM Cloud
- Skopeo vs Koyeb
- Skopeo vs Microsoft Azure
- Skopeo vs containerd
- Skopeo vs Vagrant
- Skopeo vs Rancher
- Skopeo vs Flux
- Skopeo vs kind
- Skopeo vs Kustomize
- Skopeo vs Linkerd

