APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Skopeo

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Skopeo
Cloud
Inspect, copy and sign container images without pulling them
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Skopeo single-purpose: it neither builds nor runs images, so it is one tool in a chain rather than a solution
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Skopeo covers Remote inspection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Skopeo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Skopeo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | Linux, macOS |
| Category | APIs | Cloud |
| Founded | 2017 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Skopeo
- Remote inspection
- Registry-to-registry copy
- Format conversion
- Image signing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Skopeo
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Skopeo
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Skopeo
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Skopeo
Skopeo
- Promoting images between staging and production registries without a round tripnot Kong Gateway
- Inspecting an image’s contents before deciding to deploy itnot Kong Gateway
- Mirroring images into an air-gapped or internal registrynot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Skopeo
- Single-purpose: it neither builds nor runs images, so it is one tool in a chain rather than a solution
- Command syntax with transport prefixes such as docker:// is unusual and trips people up initially
- Documentation is sparse compared with the rest of the container ecosystem
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Skopeo
Free- SkopeoFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Skopeo if
- You need remote inspection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS.
- You also want registry-to-registry copy.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Skopeo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Skopeo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Skopeo?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and Skopeo at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or Skopeo run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Skopeo runs on Linux, macOS.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Skopeo is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Skopeo cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Skopeo covers Remote inspection, Registry-to-registry copy, Format conversion, Image signing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceSkopeo: Is Skopeo free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Kong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceSkopeo: Why copy images without pulling them?
A registry-to-registry copy avoids downloading and re-uploading gigabytes, which is faster and much cheaper on bandwidth in CI.
Kong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceSkopeo: Can Skopeo run containers?
No. It only inspects, copies, signs and deletes images. Running them is Podman’s or Docker’s job.
Related pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs Portworx
- Kong Gateway vs minikube
- Kong Gateway vs Packer
- Kong Gateway vs Porter
- Kong Gateway vs Zeabur
- Kong Gateway vs Pulumi
- Kong Gateway vs Caddy
- Kong Gateway vs K3s
- Kong Gateway vs IBM Cloud
- Kong Gateway vs Koyeb
- Kong Gateway vs Microsoft Azure
- Kong Gateway vs containerd
- Kong Gateway vs Vagrant
- Kong Gateway vs Rancher
- Kong Gateway vs Flux
- Kong Gateway vs kind
- Kong Gateway vs Kustomize
- Kong Gateway vs Linkerd
- Skopeo vs Tyk
- Skopeo vs Moesif
- Skopeo vs Treblle
- Skopeo vs Convoy
- Skopeo vs Janus Gateway
- Skopeo vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Skopeo vs Gravitee
- Skopeo vs Strapi
- Skopeo vs WSO2 API Manager
- Skopeo vs AWS API Gateway
- Skopeo vs GraphQL Apollo
- Skopeo vs Appwrite
- Skopeo vs Payload CMS
- Skopeo vs Portkey
- Skopeo vs Prisma
- Skopeo vs RapidAPI
- Skopeo vs REST Client VSCode
- Skopeo vs Rutter
- Skopeo vs Portworx
- Skopeo vs minikube
- Skopeo vs Packer
- Skopeo vs Porter
- Skopeo vs Zeabur
- Skopeo vs Pulumi
- Skopeo vs Caddy
- Skopeo vs K3s
- Skopeo vs IBM Cloud
- Skopeo vs Koyeb
- Skopeo vs Microsoft Azure
- Skopeo vs containerd
- Skopeo vs Vagrant
- Skopeo vs Rancher
- Skopeo vs Flux
- Skopeo vs kind
- Skopeo vs Kustomize
- Skopeo vs Linkerd
