APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Refact

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Refact actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Refact |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Freemium with paid tiers |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | VS Code, Web |
| Category | APIs | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Refact
- Schema federationnot Refact
- API analytics and monitoringnot Refact
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot GraphQL Apollo
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot GraphQL Apollo
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot GraphQL Apollo
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Refact?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Refact run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Refact cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs GitHub Copilot
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger UI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sweep
- GraphQL Apollo vs Coder
- GraphQL Apollo vs Pieces for Developers
- GraphQL Apollo vs CodeSandbox
- GraphQL Apollo vs GNU Emacs
- GraphQL Apollo vs Moonrepo
- GraphQL Apollo vs Pants Build
- GraphQL Apollo vs Atlantis
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backstage
- GraphQL Apollo vs Visual Studio Code
- GraphQL Apollo vs Garden
- GraphQL Apollo vs GitLab CI/CD
- GraphQL Apollo vs HCP Terraform
- GraphQL Apollo vs Helm
- GraphQL Apollo vs Jitsu
- GraphQL Apollo vs Notepad++
- Refact vs Hasura
- Refact vs Appwrite
- Refact vs PocketBase
- Refact vs Sanity
- Refact vs Strapi
- Refact vs GraphQL Playground
- Refact vs Kong Gateway
- Refact vs Parse Server
- Refact vs WSO2 API Manager
- Refact vs Janus Gateway
- Refact vs Directus
- Refact vs KeystoneJS
- Refact vs Solaris
- Refact vs Stainless
- Refact vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Refact vs Thredd
- Refact vs Thunder Client
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs Garden
- Refact vs GitLab CI/CD
- Refact vs HCP Terraform
- Refact vs Helm
- Refact vs Jitsu
- Refact vs Notepad++

