Developer Tools · head to head
Atlantis vs GraphQL Apollo

Atlantis
Developer Tools
Runs Terraform plan and apply from pull request comments, self-hosted and free
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Atlantis there is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.; GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- They diverge on capability: Atlantis covers Pull request plans, GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlantis and GraphQL Apollo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlantis | GraphQL Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile |
| Category | Developer Tools | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlantis
- Pull request plans
- Comment driven apply
- Workspace locking
- Policy checking
- Multi-platform webhooks
- Custom workflows
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlantis
- Making Terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approvernot GraphQL Apollo
- Removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keysnot GraphQL Apollo
- Getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platformnot GraphQL Apollo
- Enforcing Conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can runnot GraphQL Apollo
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Atlantis
- Schema federationnot Atlantis
- API analytics and monitoringnot Atlantis
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Atlantis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlantis
- There is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.
- The security surface is inherently sharp, because it is an internet-reachable webhook endpoint that executes applies with privileged credentials, gated by pull request comment authorisation that is coarse next to a real policy engine.
- It is stateful, holding a working directory and lock database on local disk, so high availability and horizontal scaling are awkward and you own upgrades, webhook plumbing, secret rotation and the host itself.
- It lacks the features that distinguish the commercial alternatives, with no native drift detection, no cost estimation, no managed state interface and no policy engine beyond the Conftest integration.
- Terragrunt and monorepo layouts are not first-class, requiring hand-written custom workflows and repository configuration that becomes a growing maintenance burden as the number of repositories increases.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlantis
Free- AtlantisFree
- Apache-2.0, no usage limits and no seat count
- No commercial edition and no paid support tier
- Community support through GitHub and the CNCF Slack channel
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlantis if
- You need pull request plans.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want comment driven apply.
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlantis or GraphQL Apollo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlantis starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlantis or GraphQL Apollo?
- Atlantis starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free.
- Does Atlantis or GraphQL Apollo run on more platforms?
- Atlantis runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- Can I use Atlantis for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Atlantis best used for?
- Atlantis is most often used for making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver, removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys, getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platform, enforcing conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can run. Of those, making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver and removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys are not what GraphQL Apollo is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlantis do that GraphQL Apollo cannot?
- Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Comment driven apply, Workspace locking, Policy checking. GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlantis: Is there a company behind Atlantis?
No. It runs as a series of LF Projects under the Linux Foundation and is maintained by volunteers. There is no vendor to buy support from and no service level agreement.
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceAtlantis: Is it a CNCF project?
No. It uses a channel in the CNCF Slack, which is often misread as membership, but the project sits under LF Projects rather than the CNCF.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceAtlantis: Does it work with OpenTofu?
Yes, there is a dedicated integration guide alongside Terraform, and it also has configuration for working with hosted Terraform backends.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceAtlantis: What does it not do that a paid platform does?
Drift detection, cost estimation, a managed state and run interface, and a real policy engine. Atlantis does pull request plan and apply well and stops there.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- Atlantis vs Spacelift
- Atlantis vs HCP Terraform
- Atlantis vs Harness
- Atlantis vs Jitsu
- Atlantis vs Visual Studio Code
- Atlantis vs Tilt
- Atlantis vs Soketi
- Atlantis vs Pants Build
- Atlantis vs Steampipe
- Atlantis vs Refact
- Atlantis vs Penpot
- Atlantis vs GNU Emacs
- Atlantis vs Okteto
- Atlantis vs OpsLevel
- Atlantis vs PartyKit
- Atlantis vs PhpStorm
- Atlantis vs Pieces for Developers
- Atlantis vs RAD Studio
- Atlantis vs Hasura
- Atlantis vs Appwrite
- Atlantis vs PocketBase
- Atlantis vs Sanity
- Atlantis vs Strapi
- Atlantis vs GraphQL Playground
- Atlantis vs Kong Gateway
- Atlantis vs Parse Server
- Atlantis vs WSO2 API Manager
- Atlantis vs Janus Gateway
- Atlantis vs Directus
- Atlantis vs KeystoneJS
- Atlantis vs Solaris
- Atlantis vs Stainless
- Atlantis vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Atlantis vs Thredd
- Atlantis vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Spacelift
- GraphQL Apollo vs HCP Terraform
- GraphQL Apollo vs Harness
- GraphQL Apollo vs Jitsu
- GraphQL Apollo vs Visual Studio Code
- GraphQL Apollo vs Tilt
- GraphQL Apollo vs Soketi
- GraphQL Apollo vs Pants Build
- GraphQL Apollo vs Steampipe
- GraphQL Apollo vs Refact
- GraphQL Apollo vs Penpot
- GraphQL Apollo vs GNU Emacs
- GraphQL Apollo vs Okteto
- GraphQL Apollo vs OpsLevel
- GraphQL Apollo vs PartyKit
- GraphQL Apollo vs PhpStorm
- GraphQL Apollo vs Pieces for Developers
- GraphQL Apollo vs RAD Studio
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client

