Maps · head to head
Felt vs Fused

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Fused
Maps
Serverless Python for geospatial: write a UDF, get a map tile endpoint and an HTTP API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Fused the price steps are brutal: $20 to $200 to $2,000 a month with no intermediate tier, so a two-person team that outgrows Starter faces a tenfold increase for what is often a modest capacity gap.
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Fused covers User defined functions.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Fused actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Fused
- User defined functions
- Instant tile endpoints
- HTTP API
- Caching
- Workbench
- Data stack connectors
- Public UDF catalogue
- Local execution
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Fused
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Fused
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Fused
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Fused
Fused
- A data team that wants to publish a dynamic layer computed from a large Parquet dataset without standing up and operating a tile servernot Felt
- An analyst prototyping against Overture, Sentinel or Census data who needs a working map in an afternoon rather than a data engineering ticketnot Felt
- An application that needs a geospatial computation exposed as an HTTP endpoint, where the alternative is a container, a queue and an on-call rotanot Felt
- A consultancy delivering an interactive constraint or suitability map to a client, computed live from source data rather than pre-baked into static tilesnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Fused
- The price steps are brutal: $20 to $200 to $2,000 a month with no intermediate tier, so a two-person team that outgrows Starter faces a tenfold increase for what is often a modest capacity gap.
- Published tiers do not state the actual compute, storage or request allowances, so the only way to know whether $200 covers your workload is to run it and find out.
- Fused is at pre-seed stage with a small team, and putting a customer-facing map behind a startup’s serverless platform is a continuity risk that a procurement review will flag.
- It is Python-only and assumes competence with cloud-native geospatial formats; there is no path for an analyst who works in a desktop GIS and not in code.
- Serverless execution means cold starts and per-tile latency on uncached views, so a first load of a heavy UDF over a wide area is noticeably slower than a pre-rendered tile set.
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Fused
Free- FreeFree
- Workbench access
- AI assistant
- Local UDF runs
- Starter$20/month
- Secrets management
- Higher compute limits
- Office hours support
- Developer$200/month
- Dedicated jobs
- GitHub integration
- Expanded compute, storage and AI token allowance
- Professional$2000/month
- Team collaboration
- Dedicated training
- Substantially increased usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose Fused if
- You need user defined functions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want instant tile endpoints.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Fused better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Fused at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Fused?
- Felt starts at Free and Fused at Free.
- Does Felt or Fused run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. Fused runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Fused is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Fused cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Fused covers User defined functions, Instant tile endpoints, HTTP API, Caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Fused: What does Fused actually give me?
A Python function becomes a map tile endpoint and an HTTP API on managed infrastructure, with caching, without you running a server.
Felt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Fused: How much does it cost?
Free, then $20, $200 and $2,000 per month for Starter, Developer and Professional. Usage allowances are not itemised publicly.
Felt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Fused: Can I run UDFs locally?
Yes, through the Python SDK, which is how most development is done before deploying.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Fused: Does it replace PostGIS or BigQuery?
No. It reads from them. Fused is the compute and serving layer, not the store.
Fused: Is it a mature company?
No. It is a small pre-seed San Francisco company. The technology is real; the vendor risk is real too.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs deck.gl
- Felt vs Lonboard
- Felt vs Agisoft Metashape
- Felt vs Correlator3D
- Felt vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Emlid Studio
- Felt vs Geographic Calculator
- Fused vs Esri ArcGIS
- Fused vs CARTO
- Fused vs QGIS
- Fused vs Atlas.co
- Fused vs Global Mapper
- Fused vs GRASS GIS
- Fused vs onX Maps
- Fused vs Ride with GPS
- Fused vs SW Maps
- Fused vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Fused vs Kepler.gl
- Fused vs Trailforks
- Fused vs AllTrails
- Fused vs Bing Maps
- Fused vs Cesium ion
- Fused vs Citymapper
- Fused vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Fused vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Fused vs deck.gl
- Fused vs Lonboard
- Fused vs Agisoft Metashape
- Fused vs Correlator3D
- Fused vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Fused vs HERE Technologies
- Fused vs Emlid Studio
- Fused vs Geographic Calculator
