Software · head to head
Fly.io vs Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE
Software
Open-source hypervisor combining KVM and LXC virtualisation
- From
- €120/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fly.io has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fly.io egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are; Proxmox VE per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fly.io and Proxmox VE actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fly.io | Proxmox VE |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | €120/year |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Docker | Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fly.io
- Global deployment
- Docker support
- Postgres databases
- Redis support
- Auto-scaling
- Health checks
- Backups
- Monitoring
Only in Proxmox VE
Nothing recorded that Fly.io does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fly.io
- Deploying containerised applications close to users across regionsnot Proxmox VE
- Running full stack apps and databases on managed machinesnot Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
- Open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platformsnot Fly.io
- Cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisorsnot Fly.io
- High-availability clustering for disaster recovery and business continuitynot Fly.io
- Container deployments using LXC as lighter-weight alternative to Dockernot Fly.io
- Hybrid VM and container workloads in a single management interfacenot Fly.io
- Backup and archival infrastructure alongside primary virtualisationnot Fly.io
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fly.io
- Egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are
- Stopped machines still bill at $0.15 per GB of root filesystem a month, so a paused service is not a free one
- Volumes are billed on provisioned capacity rather than usage, at $0.15 per GB a month
- Reservation discounts of 40% require paying a year up front, from $36 to $1,440
- Fly Kubernetes is a separate $75 a month per cluster
- Dedicated IPv4 addresses are $2 a month each
Proxmox VE
- Per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers
- Linux-based host only; Windows hypervisors not supported, limiting adoption in Windows-focused organisations
- Clustering and high-availability setup requires operational expertise and careful network configuration
- Commercial support tiers limit advanced features (just-in-time access, network flow logs) to paid subscriptions
- Smaller ecosystem of third-party plugins and integrations compared to VMware vSphere
Pricing, plan by plan
Fly.io
Free- FreeFree
- 3 shared-cpu-1x VMs
- 3GB persistence storage
- 160GB outbound data/month
- Pay-as-you-goFree
- Unlimited applications
- Dedicated machines
- Global deployment
Proxmox VE
€120/year- Community$120/year
- Enterprise Repository access
- Community forum support only
- Per-socket subscription model
- Basic$370/year
- 3 support tickets per year
- 1 business day response time
- Stable updates and Enterprise Repository
- Standard$550/year
- 10 support tickets per year
- 4-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
- Premium$1100/year
- Unlimited support tickets
- 2-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
Which should you pick?
Choose Fly.io if
- You need global deployment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Docker.
- You also want docker support.
Questions people ask
- Is Fly.io or Proxmox VE better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fly.io starts at Free and Proxmox VE at €120/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fly.io or Proxmox VE?
- Fly.io has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fly.io and €120/year for Proxmox VE.
- Does Fly.io or Proxmox VE run on more platforms?
- Fly.io runs on Web, Api, Docker. Proxmox VE runs on Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Fly.io for free?
- Yes. Fly.io has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Proxmox VE starts at €120/year.
- What is Fly.io best used for?
- Fly.io is most often used for deploying containerised applications close to users across regions, running full stack apps and databases on managed machines. Of those, deploying containerised applications close to users across regions and running full stack apps and databases on managed machines are not what Proxmox VE is typically brought in for.
- What can Fly.io do that Proxmox VE cannot?
- Fly.io covers Global deployment, Docker support, Postgres databases, Redis support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proxmox VE: What is the licensing model for Proxmox VE?
Proxmox VE is open-source and free to deploy. Optional subscription tiers provide technical support, priority response times, and access to the Enterprise Repository for stable update channels. All tiers include identical virtualisation features.
SourceProxmox VE: Can I run Proxmox VE without a support subscription?
Yes. Community Edition (€120/year per socket) provides Enterprise Repository access with community-based support through forums. The core Proxmox VE platform is fully functional without any subscription.
SourceProxmox VE: What hypervisors does Proxmox VE support?
Proxmox VE includes both KVM for full virtualisation and LXC for Linux containers. It does not support Xen or Hyper-V. Workloads on those platforms must be migrated or reimplemented.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fly.io vs Grafana Cloud
- Fly.io vs Neon
- Fly.io vs DigitalOcean
- Fly.io vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fly.io vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Fly.io vs Deno Deploy
- Fly.io vs Heroku
- Fly.io vs Hetzner Cloud
- Fly.io vs Linode
- Fly.io vs Packer
- Fly.io vs Pulumi
- Fly.io vs Render
- Fly.io vs Upstash
- Fly.io vs Vagrant
- Fly.io vs Vultr
- Fly.io vs Akamai
- Fly.io vs Alibaba Cloud
- Fly.io vs Chef
- Proxmox VE vs Grafana Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Neon
- Proxmox VE vs DigitalOcean
- Proxmox VE vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Proxmox VE vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Proxmox VE vs Deno Deploy
- Proxmox VE vs Heroku
- Proxmox VE vs Hetzner Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Linode
- Proxmox VE vs Packer
- Proxmox VE vs Pulumi
- Proxmox VE vs Render
- Proxmox VE vs Upstash
- Proxmox VE vs Vagrant
- Proxmox VE vs Vultr
- Proxmox VE vs Akamai
- Proxmox VE vs Alibaba Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Chef

