Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Fly.io vs Vultr
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fly.io egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are; Vultr vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
- They diverge on capability: Fly.io covers Global deployment, Vultr covers Cloud servers.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fly.io and Vultr actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud & Infrastructure).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fly.io
- Global deployment
- Docker support
- Postgres databases
- Redis support
- Auto-scaling
- Health checks
- Backups
- Monitoring
Only in Vultr
- Cloud servers
- Bare metal servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Kubernetes
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fly.io
- Deploying containerised applications close to users across regionsnot Vultr
- Running full stack apps and databases on managed machinesnot Vultr
Vultr
- High performance computingnot Fly.io
- Game serversnot Fly.io
- Streamingnot Fly.io
- Database hostingnot Fly.io
- Application serversnot Fly.io
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fly.io
- Egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are
- Stopped machines still bill at $0.15 per GB of root filesystem a month, so a paused service is not a free one
- Volumes are billed on provisioned capacity rather than usage, at $0.15 per GB a month
- Reservation discounts of 40% require paying a year up front, from $36 to $1,440
- Fly Kubernetes is a separate $75 a month per cluster
- Dedicated IPv4 addresses are $2 a month each
Vultr
- Vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Fly.io
Free- FreeFree
- 3 shared-cpu-1x VMs
- 3GB persistence storage
- 160GB outbound data/month
- Pay-as-you-goFree
- Unlimited applications
- Dedicated machines
- Global deployment
Vultr
Free- Cloud Compute$2.5/month
- 512MB RAM
- 10GB SSD
- 500GB bandwidth
- Bare Metal$32/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full root access
Which should you pick?
Choose Fly.io if
- You need global deployment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Docker.
- You also want docker support.
Choose Vultr if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want bare metal servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Fly.io or Vultr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fly.io starts at Free and Vultr at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fly.io or Vultr?
- Fly.io starts at Free and Vultr at Free.
- Does Fly.io or Vultr run on more platforms?
- Fly.io runs on Web, Api, Docker. Vultr runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use Fly.io for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Fly.io best used for?
- Fly.io is most often used for deploying containerised applications close to users across regions, running full stack apps and databases on managed machines. Of those, deploying containerised applications close to users across regions and running full stack apps and databases on managed machines are not what Vultr is typically brought in for.
- What can Fly.io do that Vultr cannot?
- Fly.io covers Global deployment, Docker support, Postgres databases, Redis support. Vultr covers Cloud servers, Bare metal servers, Block storage, Object storage. Both handle Cloud deployment, Web support, Api support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fly.io vs Grafana Cloud
- Fly.io vs Neon
- Fly.io vs DigitalOcean
- Fly.io vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fly.io vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Fly.io vs Deno Deploy
- Fly.io vs Heroku
- Fly.io vs Hetzner Cloud
- Fly.io vs Linode
- Fly.io vs Packer
- Fly.io vs Pulumi
- Fly.io vs Render
- Fly.io vs Upstash
- Fly.io vs Vagrant
- Fly.io vs Akamai
- Fly.io vs Alibaba Cloud
- Fly.io vs Chef
- Fly.io vs Contabo
- Vultr vs Grafana Cloud
- Vultr vs Neon
- Vultr vs DigitalOcean
- Vultr vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vultr vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Vultr vs Deno Deploy
- Vultr vs Heroku
- Vultr vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vultr vs Linode
- Vultr vs Packer
- Vultr vs Pulumi
- Vultr vs Render
- Vultr vs Upstash
- Vultr vs Vagrant
- Vultr vs Akamai
- Vultr vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vultr vs Chef
- Vultr vs Contabo


