Software · head to head
Proxmox VE vs Vultr

Proxmox VE
Software
Open-source hypervisor combining KVM and LXC virtualisation
- From
- €120/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Vultr has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Proxmox VE per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers; Vultr vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proxmox VE and Vultr actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proxmox VE | Vultr |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | €120/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | usage-based |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted | Web, Api, Cli |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proxmox VE
Nothing recorded that Vultr does not also cover.
Only in Vultr
- Cloud servers
- Bare metal servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Kubernetes
- Firewalls
- Private networks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proxmox VE
- Open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platformsnot Vultr
- Cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisorsnot Vultr
- High-availability clustering for disaster recovery and business continuitynot Vultr
- Container deployments using LXC as lighter-weight alternative to Dockernot Vultr
- Hybrid VM and container workloads in a single management interfacenot Vultr
- Backup and archival infrastructure alongside primary virtualisationnot Vultr
Vultr
- High performance computingnot Proxmox VE
- Game serversnot Proxmox VE
- Streamingnot Proxmox VE
- Database hostingnot Proxmox VE
- Application serversnot Proxmox VE
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proxmox VE
- Per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers
- Linux-based host only; Windows hypervisors not supported, limiting adoption in Windows-focused organisations
- Clustering and high-availability setup requires operational expertise and careful network configuration
- Commercial support tiers limit advanced features (just-in-time access, network flow logs) to paid subscriptions
- Smaller ecosystem of third-party plugins and integrations compared to VMware vSphere
Vultr
- Vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Proxmox VE
€120/year- Community$120/year
- Enterprise Repository access
- Community forum support only
- Per-socket subscription model
- Basic$370/year
- 3 support tickets per year
- 1 business day response time
- Stable updates and Enterprise Repository
- Standard$550/year
- 10 support tickets per year
- 4-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
- Premium$1100/year
- Unlimited support tickets
- 2-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
Vultr
Free- Cloud Compute$2.5/month
- 512MB RAM
- 10GB SSD
- 500GB bandwidth
- Bare Metal$32/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full root access
Which should you pick?
Choose Vultr if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want bare metal servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Proxmox VE or Vultr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proxmox VE starts at €120/year and Vultr at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proxmox VE or Vultr?
- Vultr has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at €120/year for Proxmox VE and Free for Vultr.
- Does Proxmox VE or Vultr run on more platforms?
- Proxmox VE runs on Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted. Vultr runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use Vultr for free?
- Yes. Vultr has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Proxmox VE starts at €120/year.
- What is Proxmox VE best used for?
- Proxmox VE is most often used for open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platforms, cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisors, high-availability clustering for disaster recovery and business continuity, container deployments using lxc as lighter-weight alternative to docker. Of those, open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platforms and cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisors are not what Vultr is typically brought in for.
- What can Proxmox VE do that Vultr cannot?
- Vultr covers Cloud servers, Bare metal servers, Block storage, Object storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proxmox VE: What is the licensing model for Proxmox VE?
Proxmox VE is open-source and free to deploy. Optional subscription tiers provide technical support, priority response times, and access to the Enterprise Repository for stable update channels. All tiers include identical virtualisation features.
SourceProxmox VE: Can I run Proxmox VE without a support subscription?
Yes. Community Edition (€120/year per socket) provides Enterprise Repository access with community-based support through forums. The core Proxmox VE platform is fully functional without any subscription.
SourceProxmox VE: What hypervisors does Proxmox VE support?
Proxmox VE includes both KVM for full virtualisation and LXC for Linux containers. It does not support Xen or Hyper-V. Workloads on those platforms must be migrated or reimplemented.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Proxmox VE vs Grafana Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Neon
- Proxmox VE vs DigitalOcean
- Proxmox VE vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Proxmox VE vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Proxmox VE vs Deno Deploy
- Proxmox VE vs Heroku
- Proxmox VE vs Hetzner Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Linode
- Proxmox VE vs Packer
- Proxmox VE vs Pulumi
- Proxmox VE vs Render
- Proxmox VE vs Upstash
- Proxmox VE vs Vagrant
- Proxmox VE vs Akamai
- Proxmox VE vs Alibaba Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Chef
- Proxmox VE vs Contabo
- Vultr vs Grafana Cloud
- Vultr vs Neon
- Vultr vs DigitalOcean
- Vultr vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vultr vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Vultr vs Deno Deploy
- Vultr vs Heroku
- Vultr vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vultr vs Linode
- Vultr vs Packer
- Vultr vs Pulumi
- Vultr vs Render
- Vultr vs Upstash
- Vultr vs Vagrant
- Vultr vs Akamai
- Vultr vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vultr vs Chef
- Vultr vs Contabo

