Cloud · head to head
CapRover vs Proxmox VE

CapRover
Cloud
Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Proxmox VE
Cloud
Open-source hypervisor combining KVM and LXC virtualisation
- From
- €120/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CapRover has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CapRover since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.; Proxmox VE per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CapRover and Proxmox VE actually diverge.
| Attribute | CapRover | Proxmox VE |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | €120/year |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted | Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CapRover
- One-click applications
- Automatic certificates
- Web dashboard
- Multiple deploy paths
- Docker Swarm clustering
- Custom nginx configuration
Only in Proxmox VE
Nothing recorded that CapRover does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CapRover
- Running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificatesnot Proxmox VE
- A two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one boxnot Proxmox VE
- Standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing Compose filesnot Proxmox VE
- Hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensivenot Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
- Open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platformsnot CapRover
- Cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisorsnot CapRover
- High-availability clustering for disaster recovery and business continuitynot CapRover
- Container deployments using LXC as lighter-weight alternative to Dockernot CapRover
- Hybrid VM and container workloads in a single management interfacenot CapRover
- Backup and archival infrastructure alongside primary virtualisationnot CapRover
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CapRover
- Since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.
- Donations over the last twelve months totalled 285 US dollars and there is no commercial tier, so no paid support exists at any price and no maintenance commitment is funded.
- The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 with a superseding appendix that bans redistributing a paid version and refers to paid features that do not yet exist, and GitHub cannot classify it, so the terms already anticipate a commercial change of direction.
- Releases arrive in bursts with an eleven month gap between September 2023 and August 2024 and two further gaps of about six months since, so there is no basis for assuming a security fix will land promptly.
- The backup feature is documented as experimental, covers only the CapRover configuration directory and explicitly excludes persistent volumes and container images, so every database has to be dumped separately with its container stopped.
Proxmox VE
- Per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers
- Linux-based host only; Windows hypervisors not supported, limiting adoption in Windows-focused organisations
- Clustering and high-availability setup requires operational expertise and careful network configuration
- Commercial support tiers limit advanced features (just-in-time access, network flow logs) to paid subscriptions
- Smaller ecosystem of third-party plugins and integrations compared to VMware vSphere
Pricing, plan by plan
CapRover
Free- CapRoverFree
- No paid tier and no hosted offering
- Unlimited applications, servers and users
- Community support through Slack and GitHub
Proxmox VE
€120/year- Community$120/year
- Enterprise Repository access
- Community forum support only
- Per-socket subscription model
- Basic$370/year
- 3 support tickets per year
- 1 business day response time
- Stable updates and Enterprise Repository
- Standard$550/year
- 10 support tickets per year
- 4-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
- Premium$1100/year
- Unlimited support tickets
- 2-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
Which should you pick?
Choose CapRover if
- You need one-click applications.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want automatic certificates.
Questions people ask
- Is CapRover or Proxmox VE better?
- Neither clearly leads. CapRover starts at Free and Proxmox VE at €120/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CapRover or Proxmox VE?
- CapRover has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CapRover and €120/year for Proxmox VE.
- Does CapRover or Proxmox VE run on more platforms?
- CapRover runs on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. Proxmox VE runs on Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted.
- Can I use CapRover for free?
- Yes. CapRover has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Proxmox VE starts at €120/year.
- What is CapRover best used for?
- CapRover is most often used for running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates, a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box, standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing compose files, hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensive. Of those, running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates and a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box are not what Proxmox VE is typically brought in for.
- What can CapRover do that Proxmox VE cannot?
- CapRover covers One-click applications, Automatic certificates, Web dashboard, Multiple deploy paths.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CapRover: Does CapRover cost anything?
No. There is no paid tier and no hosted version. The only income is donations, which came to 285 US dollars over the last twelve months.
Proxmox VE: What is the licensing model for Proxmox VE?
Proxmox VE is open-source and free to deploy. Optional subscription tiers provide technical support, priority response times, and access to the Enterprise Repository for stable update channels. All tiers include identical virtualisation features.
SourceCapRover: Is the licence really Apache 2.0?
Not quite. The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 plus an appendix that supersedes it in case of conflict, forbidding modification of paid features and redistribution of a paid version. GitHub does not recognise the result as a standard licence.
Proxmox VE: Can I run Proxmox VE without a support subscription?
Yes. Community Edition (€120/year per socket) provides Enterprise Repository access with community-based support through forums. The core Proxmox VE platform is fully functional without any subscription.
SourceCapRover: Does the backup feature protect my databases?
No. It backs up the CapRover configuration directory only and explicitly excludes persistent directories and container images. You have to dump each database yourself with the container stopped.
Proxmox VE: What hypervisors does Proxmox VE support?
Proxmox VE includes both KVM for full virtualisation and LXC for Linux containers. It does not support Xen or Hyper-V. Workloads on those platforms must be migrated or reimplemented.
SourceCapRover: Can I move off Docker Swarm later?
Not without rebuilding. CapRover is architecturally tied to Swarm, so outgrowing it means migrating applications to a different platform rather than switching a scheduler.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CapRover vs Render
- CapRover vs K3s
- CapRover vs DigitalOcean
- CapRover vs Coolify
- CapRover vs Dokku
- CapRover vs Qovery
- CapRover vs Porter
- CapRover vs Railway
- CapRover vs Fly.io
- CapRover vs Northflank
- CapRover vs SST
- CapRover vs Heroku
- CapRover vs Jaeger
- CapRover vs Lambda
- CapRover vs Linode
- CapRover vs Longhorn
- CapRover vs minikube
- CapRover vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- CapRover vs Neon
- CapRover vs Grafana Cloud
- CapRover vs Rancher
- CapRover vs Vultr
- CapRover vs OpenEBS
- CapRover vs Anyscale
- CapRover vs Go
- CapRover vs Chef
- CapRover vs Fireworks AI
- CapRover vs Vault
- CapRover vs Beam Cloud
- CapRover vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Proxmox VE vs Render
- Proxmox VE vs K3s
- Proxmox VE vs DigitalOcean
- Proxmox VE vs Coolify
- Proxmox VE vs Dokku
- Proxmox VE vs Qovery
- Proxmox VE vs Porter
- Proxmox VE vs Railway
- Proxmox VE vs Fly.io
- Proxmox VE vs Northflank
- Proxmox VE vs SST
- Proxmox VE vs Heroku
- Proxmox VE vs Jaeger
- Proxmox VE vs Lambda
- Proxmox VE vs Linode
- Proxmox VE vs Longhorn
- Proxmox VE vs minikube
- Proxmox VE vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Proxmox VE vs Neon
- Proxmox VE vs Grafana Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Rancher
- Proxmox VE vs Vultr
- Proxmox VE vs OpenEBS
- Proxmox VE vs Anyscale
- Proxmox VE vs Go
- Proxmox VE vs Chef
- Proxmox VE vs Fireworks AI
- Proxmox VE vs Vault
- Proxmox VE vs Beam Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
