Cloud · head to head
Fly.io vs Longhorn

Longhorn
Cloud
Open source distributed block storage for Kubernetes, incubating at the CNCF
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Longhorn has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fly.io egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are; Longhorn there is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- They diverge on capability: Fly.io covers Global deployment, Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fly.io and Longhorn actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fly.io
- Global deployment
- Docker support
- Postgres databases
- Redis support
- Auto-scaling
- Health checks
- Backups
- Monitoring
Only in Longhorn
- Per-volume controllers
- Synchronous replication
- Snapshots and backups
- Volume expansion
- Disaster recovery volumes
- Web interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fly.io
- Deploying containerised applications close to users across regionsnot Longhorn
- Running full stack apps and databases on managed machinesnot Longhorn
Longhorn
- An on-premises Kubernetes cluster with local disks and no SAN that needs replicated persistent volumesnot Fly.io
- Edge sites where shipping a storage array is impractical and three nodes is the whole clusternot Fly.io
- A K3s deployment where the storage layer must be light enough to run alongside the workloadsnot Fly.io
- A team that wants snapshots and S3 backups of persistent volumes without paying per-node storage licencesnot Fly.io
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fly.io
- Egress is priced by destination region, from $0.02 per GB in North America and Europe to $0.12 per GB for Africa and India, so the same traffic costs six times more depending on where users are
- Stopped machines still bill at $0.15 per GB of root filesystem a month, so a paused service is not a free one
- Volumes are billed on provisioned capacity rather than usage, at $0.15 per GB a month
- Reservation discounts of 40% require paying a year up front, from $36 to $1,440
- Fly Kubernetes is a separate $75 a month per cluster
- Dedicated IPv4 addresses are $2 a month each
Longhorn
- There is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- Synchronous replication across nodes means write latency depends on the slowest replica and the network between nodes, which makes it a poor fit for latency-sensitive databases.
- Every replica is a full copy, so three-way replication consumes three times the raw capacity, unlike erasure-coded systems that are far more space efficient.
- It is designed for block storage on modest clusters and does not scale to the node counts or throughput that Ceph or a commercial array handles, so growth eventually forces a migration.
- Recovery from certain degraded states, such as a volume stuck detaching or replicas failing to rebuild, requires manual intervention and knowledge of Longhorn internals that is not widely held.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fly.io
$29/month- Pay-as-You-Go$null/mo
- Micro VMs and persistent storage charged by usage
- FlyCTL CLI
- Unlimited users and organizations
- Serious Support$29/month
- Access to dedicated engineering team
- All Pay-as-You-Go features
- Machine Reservation Blocks$null/mo
- 40% discount on machine usage
- Requires upfront payment for savings
- Compliance Package$99/month
- HIPAA compliance
- BAAs
- SOC2 documentation
Longhorn
Free- LonghornFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed, no licence fee
- Community support via GitHub and Slack only
- No vendor SLA or escalation path
Which should you pick?
Choose Fly.io if
- You need global deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Docker.
- You also want docker support.
Choose Longhorn if
- You need per-volume controllers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes.
- You also want synchronous replication.
Questions people ask
- Is Fly.io or Longhorn better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fly.io starts at $29/month and Longhorn at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fly.io or Longhorn?
- Longhorn has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for Fly.io and Free for Longhorn.
- Does Fly.io or Longhorn run on more platforms?
- Fly.io runs on Web, Api, Docker. Longhorn runs on Linux, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Longhorn for free?
- Yes. Longhorn has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fly.io starts at $29/month.
- What is Fly.io best used for?
- Fly.io is most often used for deploying containerised applications close to users across regions, running full stack apps and databases on managed machines. Of those, deploying containerised applications close to users across regions and running full stack apps and databases on managed machines are not what Longhorn is typically brought in for.
- What can Fly.io do that Longhorn cannot?
- Fly.io covers Global deployment, Docker support, Postgres databases, Redis support. Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers, Synchronous replication, Snapshots and backups, Volume expansion.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fly.io: Is there a free tier for Fly.io?
Fly.io does not advertise a free tier. The base plan is pay-as-you-go with usage-based pricing for Micro VMs and persistent storage. All users get FlyCTL CLI, unlimited organizations, private networking, SSO, ACLs, and scoped tokens.
SourceLonghorn: Who do we call when it breaks?
Nobody, unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime, which includes commercial support for Longhorn. This is the decisive question for production use.
Fly.io: How much does Fly.io Serious Support cost?
Serious Support costs 29 USD per month and provides access to a dedicated engineering team while maintaining all pay-as-you-go features for Micro VMs and storage.
SourceLonghorn: How much capacity does replication cost?
Full copies, so three replicas means three times the raw capacity. Budget accordingly rather than assuming erasure coding efficiency.
Fly.io: What does Fly.io Compliance Package include?
The Compliance Package is 99 USD per month and includes HIPAA compliance, BAAs, and SOC2 documentation for organizations requiring compliance certifications.
SourceLonghorn: Is it suitable for production databases?
For modest workloads yes, but synchronous replication adds write latency and high-transaction databases usually want something faster.
Fly.io: Does Fly.io offer discounts for upfront commitment?
Yes, Fly.io offers Machine Reservation Blocks with 40% discount on machine usage. This requires upfront payment but applies savings on infrastructure costs.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fly.io vs Dokku
- Fly.io vs Porter
- Fly.io vs DigitalOcean
- Fly.io vs Neon
- Fly.io vs Koyeb
- Fly.io vs Zeabur
- Fly.io vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fly.io vs Grafana Cloud
- Fly.io vs Coolify
- Fly.io vs Render
- Fly.io vs Railway
- Fly.io vs Beam Cloud
- Fly.io vs CapRover
- Fly.io vs Chef
- Fly.io vs Cilium
- Fly.io vs Contabo
- Fly.io vs containerd
- Fly.io vs Portworx
- Fly.io vs OpenEBS
- Fly.io vs Proxmox VE
- Fly.io vs Anyscale
- Fly.io vs Go
- Fly.io vs Rancher
- Fly.io vs Packer
- Fly.io vs DeepInfra
- Fly.io vs Serverless Framework
- Fly.io vs Puppet
- Fly.io vs Qovery
- Fly.io vs VictoriaMetrics
- Fly.io vs Vultr
- Fly.io vs Akamai
- Fly.io vs Vagrant
- Longhorn vs Dokku
- Longhorn vs Porter
- Longhorn vs DigitalOcean
- Longhorn vs Neon
- Longhorn vs Koyeb
- Longhorn vs Zeabur
- Longhorn vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Longhorn vs Grafana Cloud
- Longhorn vs Coolify
- Longhorn vs Render
- Longhorn vs Railway
- Longhorn vs Beam Cloud
- Longhorn vs CapRover
- Longhorn vs Chef
- Longhorn vs Cilium
- Longhorn vs Contabo
- Longhorn vs containerd
- Longhorn vs Portworx
- Longhorn vs OpenEBS
- Longhorn vs Proxmox VE
- Longhorn vs Anyscale
- Longhorn vs Go
- Longhorn vs Rancher
- Longhorn vs Packer
- Longhorn vs DeepInfra
- Longhorn vs Serverless Framework
- Longhorn vs Puppet
- Longhorn vs Qovery
- Longhorn vs VictoriaMetrics
- Longhorn vs Vultr
- Longhorn vs Akamai
- Longhorn vs Vagrant

