Cloud · head to head
Koyeb vs Longhorn

Koyeb
Cloud
High-performance serverless infrastructure for APIs, inference, and databases
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -

Longhorn
Cloud
Open source distributed block storage for Kubernetes, incubating at the CNCF
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Longhorn has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Koyeb pricing starts at $29/month with additional compute costs; Longhorn there is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- They diverge on capability: Koyeb covers Serverless containers, Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Koyeb and Longhorn actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Koyeb
- Serverless containers
- GPU support
- Global distribution
- Multi-protocol support
- Serverless Postgres
- Zero-downtime deployments
Only in Longhorn
- Per-volume controllers
- Synchronous replication
- Snapshots and backups
- Volume expansion
- Disaster recovery volumes
- Web interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Koyeb
- Deploying AI inference models globally with GPU accelerationnot Longhorn
- Building SaaS platforms with automatic scalingnot Longhorn
- Running distributed AI agents and background workersnot Longhorn
Longhorn
- An on-premises Kubernetes cluster with local disks and no SAN that needs replicated persistent volumesnot Koyeb
- Edge sites where shipping a storage array is impractical and three nodes is the whole clusternot Koyeb
- A K3s deployment where the storage layer must be light enough to run alongside the workloadsnot Koyeb
- A team that wants snapshots and S3 backups of persistent volumes without paying per-node storage licencesnot Koyeb
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Koyeb
- Pricing starts at $29/month with additional compute costs
- GPU compute is expensive at $0.75-$2.50 per hour
- Limited customization for infrastructure configuration
Longhorn
- There is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- Synchronous replication across nodes means write latency depends on the slowest replica and the network between nodes, which makes it a poor fit for latency-sensitive databases.
- Every replica is a full copy, so three-way replication consumes three times the raw capacity, unlike erasure-coded systems that are far more space efficient.
- It is designed for block storage on modest clusters and does not scale to the node counts or throughput that Ceph or a commercial array handles, so growth eventually forces a migration.
- Recovery from certain degraded states, such as a volume stuck detaching or replicas failing to rebuild, requires manual intervention and knowledge of Longhorn internals that is not widely held.
Pricing, plan by plan
Koyeb
$29/month- Pro$29/month
- $10 included compute
- 10 users
- 100 services
- Scale$299/month
- $100 included compute
- 50 users
- 1,000 services
- Enterprise$1000/month
- Unlimited users
- Custom resources
- SSO/RBAC
Longhorn
Free- LonghornFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed, no licence fee
- Community support via GitHub and Slack only
- No vendor SLA or escalation path
Which should you pick?
Choose Koyeb if
- You need serverless containers.
- You work on Web, CLI, API.
- You also want gpu support.
Choose Longhorn if
- You need per-volume controllers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes.
- You also want synchronous replication.
Questions people ask
- Is Koyeb or Longhorn better?
- Neither clearly leads. Koyeb starts at $29/month and Longhorn at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Koyeb or Longhorn?
- Longhorn has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for Koyeb and Free for Longhorn.
- Does Koyeb or Longhorn run on more platforms?
- Koyeb runs on Web, CLI, API. Longhorn runs on Linux, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Longhorn for free?
- Yes. Longhorn has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Koyeb starts at $29/month.
- What is Koyeb best used for?
- Koyeb is most often used for deploying ai inference models globally with gpu acceleration, building saas platforms with automatic scaling, running distributed ai agents and background workers. Of those, deploying ai inference models globally with gpu acceleration and building saas platforms with automatic scaling are not what Longhorn is typically brought in for.
- What can Koyeb do that Longhorn cannot?
- Koyeb covers Serverless containers, GPU support, Global distribution, Multi-protocol support. Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers, Synchronous replication, Snapshots and backups, Volume expansion.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Koyeb: What are Koyeb's subscription plans?
Pro plan is $29/month with $10 included compute, Scale plan is $299/month with $100 included compute and 99.9% SLA, and Enterprise starts at $1,000/month with unlimited users and 99.99% SLA.
SourceLonghorn: Who do we call when it breaks?
Nobody, unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime, which includes commercial support for Longhorn. This is the decisive question for production use.
Koyeb: How much does GPU compute cost?
GPU pricing is per-second: RTX-A6000 costs $0.75/hour, A100 costs $1.60/hour, H100 costs $2.50/hour, and 8x H100 costs $20.00/hour.
SourceLonghorn: How much capacity does replication cost?
Full copies, so three replicas means three times the raw capacity. Budget accordingly rather than assuming erasure coding efficiency.
Koyeb: What database options are available?
Koyeb offers serverless Postgres starting at free (0.25 vCPU, 1GB RAM) up to 3XL at $1.28/hour with 8 vCPU and 32GB RAM. Storage costs $0.50/month per GB.
SourceLonghorn: Is it suitable for production databases?
For modest workloads yes, but synchronous replication adds write latency and high-transaction databases usually want something faster.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Koyeb vs Render
- Koyeb vs Fly.io
- Koyeb vs Railway
- Koyeb vs Beam Cloud
- Koyeb vs Cerebrium
- Koyeb vs Northflank
- Koyeb vs Upstash
- Koyeb vs Deno Deploy
- Koyeb vs Serverless Framework
- Koyeb vs Neon
- Koyeb vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Koyeb vs Lambda
- Koyeb vs Cilium
- Koyeb vs Contabo
- Koyeb vs Coolify
- Koyeb vs Crossplane
- Koyeb vs Dokku
- Koyeb vs containerd
- Koyeb vs Portworx
- Koyeb vs OpenEBS
- Koyeb vs Proxmox VE
- Koyeb vs Anyscale
- Koyeb vs Go
- Koyeb vs Rancher
- Koyeb vs Packer
- Koyeb vs DeepInfra
- Koyeb vs Puppet
- Koyeb vs Qovery
- Koyeb vs Porter
- Koyeb vs VictoriaMetrics
- Koyeb vs Vultr
- Koyeb vs Akamai
- Koyeb vs Vagrant
- Longhorn vs Render
- Longhorn vs Fly.io
- Longhorn vs Railway
- Longhorn vs Beam Cloud
- Longhorn vs Cerebrium
- Longhorn vs Northflank
- Longhorn vs Upstash
- Longhorn vs Deno Deploy
- Longhorn vs Serverless Framework
- Longhorn vs Neon
- Longhorn vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Longhorn vs Lambda
- Longhorn vs Cilium
- Longhorn vs Contabo
- Longhorn vs Coolify
- Longhorn vs Crossplane
- Longhorn vs Dokku
- Longhorn vs containerd
- Longhorn vs Portworx
- Longhorn vs OpenEBS
- Longhorn vs Proxmox VE
- Longhorn vs Anyscale
- Longhorn vs Go
- Longhorn vs Rancher
- Longhorn vs Packer
- Longhorn vs DeepInfra
- Longhorn vs Puppet
- Longhorn vs Qovery
- Longhorn vs Porter
- Longhorn vs VictoriaMetrics
- Longhorn vs Vultr
- Longhorn vs Akamai
- Longhorn vs Vagrant
