Automation Integration · head to head
Flowable vs RudderStack

Flowable
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

RudderStack
Automation Integration
The open-source customer data platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; RudderStack on the free plan data processing stops after a second consecutive overage rather than being billed, so exceeding 250,000 events twice breaks the pipeline
- They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, RudderStack covers Data collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flowable and RudderStack actually diverge.
| Attribute | Flowable | RudderStack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud | Web, Self-hosted |
| Founded | Unknown | 2018 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flowable
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- CMMN case management
- DMN decision tables
- Spring Boot integration
- Modelling studio
- Task and case application
- REST APIs
- History and audit
Only in RudderStack
- Data collection
- Event tracking
- Audience segmentation
- Warehouse ingestion
- Real-time sync
- Data transformation
- Privacy controls
- 200+ destinations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flowable
- An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot RudderStack
- A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot RudderStack
- A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot RudderStack
- A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot RudderStack
RudderStack
- Collecting event data from apps and websites and routing it to warehouses and toolsnot Flowable
- Building a warehouse first customer data pipelinenot Flowable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flowable
- The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
- It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
- The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
- Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.
RudderStack
- On the free plan data processing stops after a second consecutive overage rather than being billed, so exceeding 250,000 events twice breaks the pipeline
- The free plan allows 250,000 events a month
- Growth starts at $265 a month for 1 million events, with volume sold in tiers up to 25 million
- Overage is charged as the gap to the next tier's price rather than per event, so a small excess costs a full tier step
Pricing, plan by plan
Flowable
Free- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
- Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
- No modelling studio or enterprise applications
- Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
- Modelling studio, work application and admin console
- Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
- Support with SLA and version maintenance
RudderStack
Free- FreeFree
- 250K events per month
- 16 SDK sources
- 200+ cloud destinations
- Growth$265/month
- 1 million events per month (up to 25 million available)
- Unlimited team members
- Tracking plans
- Enterprise$null/mo
- 5-minute warehouse sync
- Unlimited transformations
- Access to Profiles & Data Apps
Which should you pick?
Choose Flowable if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want cmmn case management.
Choose RudderStack if
- You need data collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want event tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Flowable or RudderStack better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and RudderStack at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flowable or RudderStack?
- Flowable starts at Free and RudderStack at Free.
- Does Flowable or RudderStack run on more platforms?
- Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. RudderStack runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Flowable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flowable best used for?
- Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what RudderStack is typically brought in for.
- What can Flowable do that RudderStack cannot?
- Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. RudderStack covers Data collection, Event tracking, Audience segmentation, Warehouse ingestion.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flowable: Is Flowable open source?
Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.
RudderStack: What is RudderStack's free plan limit?
RudderStack's free plan includes 250K events per month with 16 SDK sources, 200+ cloud destinations, warehouse destinations, and Reverse ETL at no cost.
SourceFlowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?
The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.
RudderStack: How much does RudderStack Growth plan cost?
RudderStack Growth plan costs $265 per month with annual billing discount available, providing 1 million events per month (up to 25 million available), unlimited team members, and 2 workspaces.
SourceFlowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.
RudderStack: What happens if I exceed my RudderStack event limit?
On the free plan, data processing stops after your second consecutive overage. Paid plan customers face overage fees calculated as the difference between the next tier's pricing and their current plan.
SourceFlowable: Why choose it over Camunda?
CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.
Related pages
More on RudderStack
Other head to heads
- Flowable vs Temporal
- Flowable vs Nintex
- Flowable vs jBPM
- Flowable vs Activiti
- Flowable vs Camunda
- Flowable vs Kogito
- Flowable vs Airbyte
- Flowable vs Nango
- Flowable vs Windmill
- Flowable vs Hatchet
- Flowable vs Meltano
- Flowable vs HighLevel
- Flowable vs Grouparoo
- Flowable vs Hevo Data
- Flowable vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Flowable vs IBM MQ
- Flowable vs n8n
- Flowable vs Zapier
- Flowable vs MuleSoft
- Flowable vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Flowable vs Tealium
- Flowable vs mParticle
- Flowable vs Lytics
- Flowable vs Hightouch
- Flowable vs Jitterbit
- Flowable vs Pipedream
- Flowable vs Tray.io
- RudderStack vs Temporal
- RudderStack vs Nintex
- RudderStack vs jBPM
- RudderStack vs Activiti
- RudderStack vs Camunda
- RudderStack vs Kogito
- RudderStack vs Airbyte
- RudderStack vs Nango
- RudderStack vs Windmill
- RudderStack vs Hatchet
- RudderStack vs Meltano
- RudderStack vs HighLevel
- RudderStack vs Grouparoo
- RudderStack vs Hevo Data
- RudderStack vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- RudderStack vs IBM MQ
- RudderStack vs n8n
- RudderStack vs Zapier
- RudderStack vs MuleSoft
- RudderStack vs Microsoft Power Automate
- RudderStack vs Tealium
- RudderStack vs mParticle
- RudderStack vs Lytics
- RudderStack vs Hightouch
- RudderStack vs Jitterbit
- RudderStack vs Pipedream
- RudderStack vs Tray.io
