Softwr

Automation Integration · head to head

Flowable vs Polytomic

Flowable logo

Flowable

Automation Integration

Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Polytomic logo

Polytomic

Automation Integration

Sync your business logic with data

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; Polytomic pricing begins at $500 a month on the Standard plan
  • They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Polytomic covers No-code syncing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Flowable and Polytomic actually diverge.

Attributes where Flowable and Polytomic differ
AttributeFlowablePolytomic
Pricing modelquoteusage-based
PlatformsLinux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, CloudWeb
FoundedUnknown2021

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Flowable

  • BPMN 2.0 engine
  • CMMN case management
  • DMN decision tables
  • Spring Boot integration
  • Modelling studio
  • Task and case application
  • REST APIs
  • History and audit

Only in Polytomic

  • No-code syncing
  • Bidirectional sync
  • Data transformation
  • Error handling
  • Scheduling
  • Monitoring
  • Analytics
  • 100+ apps

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Flowable

  • An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot Polytomic
  • A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot Polytomic
  • A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot Polytomic
  • A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot Polytomic

Polytomic

  • Syncing data between warehouses, databases, spreadsheets and business appsnot Flowable
  • Reverse ETL from a warehouse into operational toolsnot Flowable

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Flowable

  • The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
  • It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
  • Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
  • The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
  • Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.

Polytomic

  • Pricing begins at $500 a month on the Standard plan
  • Neither plan publishes a full rate, sync limit or row allowance, and both direct buyers to book a call
  • SSO, on premise deployment and phone support are Enterprise only

Pricing, plan by plan

Flowable

Free
  • Flowable Open SourceFree
    • Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
    • Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
    • No modelling studio or enterprise applications
  • Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Modelling studio, work application and admin console
    • Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
    • Support with SLA and version maintenance

Polytomic

Free
  • StarterFree
    • Limited syncs
    • Basic support
  • Professional$300/month
    • Unlimited syncs
    • Email support
  • Enterprise$1200/month
    • Advanced features
    • Dedicated support

Which should you pick?

Choose Flowable if

  • You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
  • You also want cmmn case management.
Flowable review

Choose Polytomic if

  • You need no-code syncing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want bidirectional sync.
Polytomic review

Questions people ask

Is Flowable or Polytomic better?
Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and Polytomic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Flowable or Polytomic?
Flowable starts at Free and Polytomic at Free.
Does Flowable or Polytomic run on more platforms?
Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Polytomic runs on Web.
Can I use Flowable for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Flowable best used for?
Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what Polytomic is typically brought in for.
What can Flowable do that Polytomic cannot?
Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. Polytomic covers No-code syncing, Bidirectional sync, Data transformation, Error handling.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Flowable: Is Flowable open source?

Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.

Polytomic: What is Polytomic's minimum monthly cost?

Polytomic Standard tier starts at $500/month for sync capabilities across databases, warehouses, spreadsheets, apps, and APIs with live chat support. Custom pricing available for Enterprise tier. Source: https://www.polytomic.com/pricing

Source
Flowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?

The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.

Polytomic: Does Polytomic offer on-premises deployment?

Yes. On-premises deployment is available on the Enterprise plan with custom pricing. Includes SSO, dedicated engineer support, and phone support. Source: https://www.polytomic.com/pricing

Source
Flowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?

Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.

Polytomic: What support does Polytomic Standard tier include?

Polytomic Standard tier ($500/month) includes live chat support for data synchronization questions. Enterprise tier upgrades to dedicated engineer support and phone support. Source: https://www.polytomic.com/pricing

Source
Flowable: Why choose it over Camunda?

CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.

Share

Related pages

More on Flowable

More on Polytomic

Keep looking

Other head to heads