Software · head to head
Flax Engine vs Stencyl
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flax Engine flax charges a 4% royalty on game earnings above $250,000, assessed per calendar quarter; Stencyl the free Starter tier can publish to the web only
- They diverge on capability: Flax Engine covers 3D graphics rendering, Stencyl covers Visual block programming.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flax Engine and Stencyl actually diverge.
| Attribute | Flax Engine | Stencyl |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Playstation, Xbox | Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Flash |
| Founded | 2017 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flax Engine
- 3D graphics rendering
- Visual editor
- C# scripting
- Audio system
- Particle effects
- Skeletal animation
- Material system
- Lighting system
Only in Stencyl
- Visual block programming
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Sprite animation
- Sound and music
- Tilemap editor
- Actor system
- Haxe support
- GitHub
Both cover
- Physics engine
- Local deployment
- Windows support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flax Engine
- Building 3D games in C# and C++ with full engine source accessnot Stencyl
- Multi-platform deployment from one editornot Stencyl
- Prototyping with the bundled Flax Samples projectsnot Stencyl
Stencyl
- Building 2D games with visual block based logicnot Flax Engine
- Publishing the same project to web, desktop and mobilenot Flax Engine
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flax Engine
- Flax charges a 4% royalty on game earnings above $250,000, assessed per calendar quarter
- Free use is granted for non-commercial or educational usage; commercial releases fall under the royalty
- Users must accept the Flax Engine End-User License Agreement before using the engine or its tools, so it is not an OSI open source licence despite the source being on GitHub
- Non-game uses such as in-house tools or SaaS products need a custom licence negotiated with the vendor, and no rate card is published for per-seat or flat-fee options
Stencyl
- The free Starter tier can publish to the web only
- Desktop publishing requires the Indie plan at $99 a year
- iOS and Android publishing require the Studio plan at $199 a year
- Licences are annual, so continuing to publish means continuing to pay
Pricing, plan by plan
Flax Engine
Free- FreeFree
- Full engine
- Visual editor
- C# scripting
Stencyl
Free- FreeFree
- Full editor access
- Desktop export
- Mobile export
Which should you pick?
Choose Flax Engine if
- You need 3d graphics rendering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Playstation, Xbox.
- You also want visual editor.
Choose Stencyl if
- You need visual block programming.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Flash.
- You also want drag-and-drop interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Flax Engine or Stencyl better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flax Engine starts at Free and Stencyl at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flax Engine or Stencyl?
- Flax Engine starts at Free and Stencyl at Free.
- Does Flax Engine or Stencyl run on more platforms?
- Flax Engine runs on Windows, Linux, Playstation, Xbox. Stencyl runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Flash.
- Can I use Flax Engine for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flax Engine best used for?
- Flax Engine is most often used for building 3d games in c# and c++ with full engine source access, multi-platform deployment from one editor, prototyping with the bundled flax samples projects. Of those, building 3d games in c# and c++ with full engine source access and multi-platform deployment from one editor are not what Stencyl is typically brought in for.
- What can Flax Engine do that Stencyl cannot?
- Flax Engine covers 3D graphics rendering, Visual editor, C# scripting, Audio system. Stencyl covers Visual block programming, Drag-and-drop interface, Sprite animation, Sound and music. Both handle Physics engine, Local deployment, Windows support, Linux support.
Related pages
More on Flax Engine
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Flax Engine vs DragonBones
- Flax Engine vs Unity
- Flax Engine vs Aseprite
- Flax Engine vs Godot Engine
- Flax Engine vs Cascadeur
- Flax Engine vs Construct 3
- Flax Engine vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Flax Engine vs Mixamo
- Flax Engine vs Pico-8
- Flax Engine vs Substance 3D Painter
- Flax Engine vs Adventure Game Studio
- Flax Engine vs AppGameKit
- Flax Engine vs Armory3D
- Flax Engine vs Bevy
- Flax Engine vs Buildbox
- Flax Engine vs Clickteam Fusion
- Flax Engine vs Cocos2d-x
- Flax Engine vs CryEngine
- Stencyl vs DragonBones
- Stencyl vs Unity
- Stencyl vs Aseprite
- Stencyl vs Godot Engine
- Stencyl vs Cascadeur
- Stencyl vs Construct 3
- Stencyl vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Stencyl vs Mixamo
- Stencyl vs Pico-8
- Stencyl vs Substance 3D Painter
- Stencyl vs Adventure Game Studio
- Stencyl vs AppGameKit
- Stencyl vs Armory3D
- Stencyl vs Bevy
- Stencyl vs Buildbox
- Stencyl vs Clickteam Fusion
- Stencyl vs Cocos2d-x
- Stencyl vs CryEngine


