Insurance · head to head
Five Sigma vs Openly

Five Sigma
Insurance
Cloud claims management with decision support aimed at insurers who cannot fund a full core programme
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Openly
Insurance
Customizable homeowners insurance sold only through independent agents
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Five Sigma the reference base is small compared with established claims vendors, so procurement and audit committees will ask for viability assurances you cannot fully answer.; Openly available in only 24 states as of August 2026, with Nevada still listed as coming soon
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Five Sigma and Openly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Five Sigma | Openly |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, API | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Five Sigma
- Claim file management
- Automation rules
- Adjuster decision support
- Vendor and litigation management
- Configurable lines
- Reporting and data export
Only in Openly
Nothing recorded that Five Sigma does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Five Sigma
- A third-party administrator replacing a homegrown claims system without a multi-year programmenot Openly
- An MGA taking claims handling in house from a delegated authority arrangementnot Openly
- A mid-sized carrier that needs a modern claims system but cannot fund a core suite replacementnot Openly
- A programme business that must report claims data to capacity providers in a consistent formatnot Openly
Openly
- Getting home insurance quotes with guaranteed replacement cost coveragenot Five Sigma
- Customizing homeowners insurance policies with specific coverage limitsnot Five Sigma
- Filing and managing property damage claims through digital workflowsnot Five Sigma
- Accessing insurance coverage across multiple US states through independent agentsnot Five Sigma
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Five Sigma
- The reference base is small compared with established claims vendors, so procurement and audit committees will ask for viability assurances you cannot fully answer.
- Automation benefits depend entirely on your claim mix, and a book with high-complexity liability claims sees far less handling time reduction than a high-volume property book.
- There is almost no third-party integrator market, so implementation, configuration and later changes route through the vendor and its capacity becomes your constraint.
- Deep integration with legacy policy systems is your responsibility, and claims platforms are only as useful as the policy and coverage data flowing into them.
- Regulatory reporting for many United States states is not as complete out of the box as it is on platforms that have served American carriers for decades, so expect some reporting build.
Openly
- Available in only 24 states as of August 2026, with Nevada still listed as coming soon
- Policies are not sold directly to consumers; coverage must be obtained through an independent agent, as of August 2026
Pricing, plan by plan
Five Sigma
On request- Five Sigma Claims$undefined/year
- Claims administration
- Automation and decision support
- Configurable lines of business
Openly
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Openly review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Five Sigma if
- You need claim file management.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want automation rules.
Choose Openly if
Nothing in the data separates Openly from Five Sigma on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Five Sigma or Openly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Five Sigma starts at On request and Openly at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Five Sigma or Openly?
- Five Sigma starts at On request and Openly at On request.
- Does Five Sigma or Openly run on more platforms?
- Five Sigma runs on Web, API. Openly runs on Web.
- What is Five Sigma best used for?
- Five Sigma is most often used for a third-party administrator replacing a homegrown claims system without a multi-year programme, an mga taking claims handling in house from a delegated authority arrangement, a mid-sized carrier that needs a modern claims system but cannot fund a core suite replacement, a programme business that must report claims data to capacity providers in a consistent format. Of those, a third-party administrator replacing a homegrown claims system without a multi-year programme and an mga taking claims handling in house from a delegated authority arrangement are not what Openly is typically brought in for.
- What can Five Sigma do that Openly cannot?
- Five Sigma covers Claim file management, Automation rules, Adjuster decision support, Vendor and litigation management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Five Sigma: Who is the typical buyer?
Third-party administrators, MGAs and small to mid-sized carriers that need a real claims system without a core suite budget.
Openly: How much does Openly cost?
Openly does not publish pricing on its website. The company operates through independent agency partners who provide customized quotes. To obtain coverage pricing, customers must contact a local independent agent or request a quote through mylifeprotected.com/openly.
SourceFive Sigma: How does it compare with Guidewire ClaimCenter?
ClaimCenter has far more depth, references and integrator support, and costs correspondingly more with a longer implementation. Five Sigma competes on time to live.
Openly: What is Openly's pricing model?
Openly uses a partnership model rather than direct sales. Insurance policies are sold through independent agency partners, with pricing determined on a case-by-case basis through customized quotes.
SourceFive Sigma: What should we test in a pilot?
Adjuster handling time on your own claim mix. The commercial case rests on that measurement, not on the feature list.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Five Sigma vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Five Sigma vs Snapsheet Claims
- Five Sigma vs Origami Risk
- Five Sigma vs Socotra
- Five Sigma vs INSTANDA
- Five Sigma vs Novidea
- Five Sigma vs Better Agency
- Five Sigma vs ClaimVantage
- Five Sigma vs FINEOS
- Five Sigma vs Ivans
- Five Sigma vs BriteCore
- Five Sigma vs Policyholders
- Five Sigma vs QQCatalyst
- Five Sigma vs Root Insurance
- Five Sigma vs Semsee
- Five Sigma vs Shift Technology
- Five Sigma vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Five Sigma vs Duck Creek
- Five Sigma vs Duck Creek Policy
- Five Sigma vs Kin Insurance
- Five Sigma vs Pie Insurance
- Five Sigma vs Hippo
- Five Sigma vs EZLynx
- Five Sigma vs Bold Penguin
- Five Sigma vs Bolt Solutions
- Five Sigma vs Embroker
- Five Sigma vs AgencyBloc
- Five Sigma vs Tarmika
- Five Sigma vs AgencyZoom
- Five Sigma vs Insurity Suite
- Five Sigma vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Openly vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Openly vs Snapsheet Claims
- Openly vs Origami Risk
- Openly vs Socotra
- Openly vs INSTANDA
- Openly vs Novidea
- Openly vs Better Agency
- Openly vs ClaimVantage
- Openly vs FINEOS
- Openly vs Ivans
- Openly vs BriteCore
- Openly vs Policyholders
- Openly vs QQCatalyst
- Openly vs Root Insurance
- Openly vs Semsee
- Openly vs Shift Technology
- Openly vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Openly vs Duck Creek
- Openly vs Duck Creek Policy
- Openly vs Kin Insurance
- Openly vs Pie Insurance
- Openly vs Hippo
- Openly vs EZLynx
- Openly vs Bold Penguin
- Openly vs Bolt Solutions
- Openly vs Embroker
- Openly vs AgencyBloc
- Openly vs Tarmika
- Openly vs AgencyZoom
- Openly vs Insurity Suite
- Openly vs Majesco Policy for L&A
