Healthcare · head to head
Figure 1 vs Visage Imaging

Figure 1
Healthcare
Medical photography and knowledge sharing platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Figure 1 has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- They diverge on capability: Figure 1 covers Case Sharing, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Figure 1 and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | Figure 1 | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Figure 1
- Case Sharing
- Secure Messaging
- Image Upload
- Knowledge Discovery
- CME Access
- Collaboration
- HIPAA Compliant
- HIPAA
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Figure 1
- Patient Carenot Visage Imaging
- Medical Recordsnot Visage Imaging
- Practice Managementnot Visage Imaging
- Telehealthnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot Figure 1
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot Figure 1
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot Figure 1
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot Figure 1
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Figure 1
Nothing recorded yet. See the Figure 1 review.
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
Figure 1
Free- FreeFree
- Access to cases
- HIPAA-compliant
- Secure sharing
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose Figure 1 if
- You need case sharing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want secure messaging.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Figure 1 or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. Figure 1 starts at Free and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Figure 1 or Visage Imaging?
- Figure 1 has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Figure 1 and On request for Visage Imaging.
- Does Figure 1 or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- Figure 1 runs on Web, Mobile. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- Can I use Figure 1 for free?
- Yes. Figure 1 has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Visage Imaging starts at On request.
- What is Figure 1 best used for?
- Figure 1 is most often used for patient care, medical records, practice management, telehealth. Of those, patient care and medical records are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can Figure 1 do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- Figure 1 covers Case Sharing, Secure Messaging, Image Upload, Knowledge Discovery. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Visage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
Visage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
Visage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
Visage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- Figure 1 vs Athenahealth
- Figure 1 vs Epic Systems
- Figure 1 vs Cerner
- Figure 1 vs Amwell
- Figure 1 vs Ambra Health
- Figure 1 vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Figure 1 vs Aidoc
- Figure 1 vs Jane App
- Figure 1 vs Clue
- Figure 1 vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Figure 1 vs Kareo Clinical
- Figure 1 vs Practice Fusion
- Figure 1 vs Ro
- Figure 1 vs RXNT
- Figure 1 vs Signant Health
- Figure 1 vs Sysmex
- Figure 1 vs Talkspace
- Figure 1 vs Epic MyChart
- Figure 1 vs Sectra
- Figure 1 vs Rad AI
- Figure 1 vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Figure 1 vs Gleamer
- Figure 1 vs Annalise.ai
- Figure 1 vs OpenMRS
- Figure 1 vs Allscripts
- Figure 1 vs Dentrix
- Figure 1 vs DHIS2
- Figure 1 vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Athenahealth
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Cerner
- Visage Imaging vs Amwell
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Jane App
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Visage Imaging vs Kareo Clinical
- Visage Imaging vs Practice Fusion
- Visage Imaging vs Ro
- Visage Imaging vs RXNT
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Sysmex
- Visage Imaging vs Talkspace
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
