Healthcare · head to head
Figure 1 vs Fujifilm Synapse

Figure 1
Healthcare
Medical photography and knowledge sharing platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Fujifilm Synapse
Healthcare
Enterprise imaging platform covering PACS, VNA, cardiology and 3D from Fujifilm Healthcare
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Figure 1 has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- They diverge on capability: Figure 1 covers Case Sharing, Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Figure 1 and Fujifilm Synapse actually diverge.
| Attribute | Figure 1 | Fujifilm Synapse |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Figure 1
- Case Sharing
- Secure Messaging
- Image Upload
- Knowledge Discovery
- CME Access
- Collaboration
- HIPAA Compliant
- HIPAA
Only in Fujifilm Synapse
- Synapse PACS
- Synapse VNA
- Synapse Cardiovascular
- Synapse 3D
- Synapse Mobility
- Deconstructed PACS support
- Cloud services
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Figure 1
- Patient Carenot Fujifilm Synapse
- Medical Recordsnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Practice Managementnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Telehealthnot Fujifilm Synapse
Fujifilm Synapse
- A hospital replacing PACS that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitivenot Figure 1
- A health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policynot Figure 1
- An outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotelynot Figure 1
- A site pursuing a deconstructed PACS strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archivenot Figure 1
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Figure 1
Nothing recorded yet. See the Figure 1 review.
Fujifilm Synapse
- PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.
- Synapse 3D is licensed by concurrent user and sized from average concurrency, which leaves radiologists queued for advanced visualisation at the morning reading peak and forces an unplanned licence purchase.
- As an independent informatics vendor Fujifilm has less privileged access to proprietary modality data than Philips or Siemens have on their own scanners, so some vendor specific post processing is not available.
- The vendor neutral archive absorbs non DICOM object types only after per specialty configuration work, and departments such as ophthalmology and dermatology usually need bespoke ingestion projects that were not in the original scope.
- Migrating a decade of priors from a legacy archive is a large professional services line that Fujifilm quotes separately, and these migrations regularly run past the contracted go live date.
Pricing, plan by plan
Figure 1
Free- FreeFree
- Access to cases
- HIPAA-compliant
- Secure sharing
Fujifilm Synapse
On request- Synapse$undefined/year
- Each module licensed separately: PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular, 3D
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Synapse 3D licensed by concurrent user, separate from PACS
Which should you pick?
Choose Figure 1 if
- You need case sharing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want secure messaging.
Choose Fujifilm Synapse if
- You need synapse pacs.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want synapse vna.
Questions people ask
- Is Figure 1 or Fujifilm Synapse better?
- Neither clearly leads. Figure 1 starts at Free and Fujifilm Synapse at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Figure 1 or Fujifilm Synapse?
- Figure 1 has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Figure 1 and On request for Fujifilm Synapse.
- Does Figure 1 or Fujifilm Synapse run on more platforms?
- Figure 1 runs on Web, Mobile. Fujifilm Synapse runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Figure 1 for free?
- Yes. Figure 1 has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request.
- What is Figure 1 best used for?
- Figure 1 is most often used for patient care, medical records, practice management, telehealth. Of those, patient care and medical records are not what Fujifilm Synapse is typically brought in for.
- What can Figure 1 do that Fujifilm Synapse cannot?
- Figure 1 covers Case Sharing, Secure Messaging, Image Upload, Knowledge Discovery. Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular, Synapse 3D.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fujifilm Synapse: Is Synapse one product or several?
Several. Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular and Synapse 3D are separately licensed products under one brand. Price and scope each one individually.
Fujifilm Synapse: Do I have to buy Fujifilm scanners?
No. Fujifilm sells Synapse independently of imaging hardware, which is a large part of why it wins competitive PACS replacements at mixed fleet sites.
Fujifilm Synapse: Does Synapse publish pricing?
No. Pricing is quoted by study volume, concurrent users, module mix and storage capacity.
Fujifilm Synapse: Can Synapse VNA store non radiology images?
Yes, including visible light, ophthalmology and wound photography, but each specialty typically needs its own ingestion and metadata configuration project.
Related pages
More on Fujifilm Synapse
Other head to heads
- Figure 1 vs Athenahealth
- Figure 1 vs Epic Systems
- Figure 1 vs Cerner
- Figure 1 vs Amwell
- Figure 1 vs Ambra Health
- Figure 1 vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Figure 1 vs Aidoc
- Figure 1 vs Jane App
- Figure 1 vs Clue
- Figure 1 vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Figure 1 vs Kareo Clinical
- Figure 1 vs Practice Fusion
- Figure 1 vs Ro
- Figure 1 vs RXNT
- Figure 1 vs Signant Health
- Figure 1 vs Sysmex
- Figure 1 vs Talkspace
- Figure 1 vs Epic MyChart
- Figure 1 vs Sectra
- Figure 1 vs Visage Imaging
- Figure 1 vs Rad AI
- Figure 1 vs Gleamer
- Figure 1 vs Annalise.ai
- Figure 1 vs Nookal
- Figure 1 vs Lunit
- Figure 1 vs Flo
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Athenahealth
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Epic Systems
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Cerner
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Amwell
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ambra Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Aidoc
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Jane App
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Clue
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Kareo Clinical
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Practice Fusion
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ro
- Fujifilm Synapse vs RXNT
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Signant Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sysmex
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Talkspace
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Epic MyChart
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sectra
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Visage Imaging
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Rad AI
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Gleamer
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Annalise.ai
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Nookal
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Lunit
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Flo
