Healthcare · head to head
Figure 1 vs Signant Health

Figure 1
Healthcare
Medical photography and knowledge sharing platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Signant Health
Healthcare
eCOA-first clinical trial platform that has grown outward into EDC, eConsent and televisits
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Figure 1 has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- They diverge on capability: Figure 1 covers Case Sharing, Signant Health covers eCOA and ePRO.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Figure 1 and Signant Health actually diverge.
| Attribute | Figure 1 | Signant Health |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Figure 1
- Case Sharing
- Secure Messaging
- Image Upload
- Knowledge Discovery
- CME Access
- Collaboration
- HIPAA Compliant
- HIPAA
Only in Signant Health
- eCOA and ePRO
- Unified platform
- eConsent
- Randomisation and supplies
- TeleVisits
- Rater training
- Data surveillance
- Instrument library
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Figure 1
- Patient Carenot Signant Health
- Medical Recordsnot Signant Health
- Practice Managementnot Signant Health
- Telehealthnot Signant Health
Signant Health
- A central nervous system or psychiatry trial where the primary endpoint is a rated scale and rater consistency decides the readoutnot Figure 1
- A global study needing an outcome instrument translated and linguistically validated across a dozen languagesnot Figure 1
- A decentralised or hybrid protocol combining televisits, eConsent and at-home patient reported outcomesnot Figure 1
- A sponsor consolidating separate eCOA, eConsent and randomisation vendors onto one platform to cut reconciliation worknot Figure 1
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Figure 1
Nothing recorded yet. See the Figure 1 review.
Signant Health
- No pricing is published, and the software licence is a minority of the real bill once instrument licensing, translations, device provisioning and services are added, so early budget estimates are routinely too low.
- Linguistic validation is charged per instrument per language and is on the critical path to first patient in, so adding a country late in start-up produces both a cost and a schedule hit.
- Provisioned participant devices bring logistics, replacement, shipping and cellular connectivity obligations that persist for the life of the trial and are frequently underestimated.
- The EDC component is newer than the eCOA heritage, so sponsors with complex data management requirements often keep an incumbent EDC and lose the single-database benefit that justifies the platform.
- It is priced and scoped for sponsor-grade trials, which makes it a poor fit for investigator-initiated or academic studies that need outcome collection without the services layer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Figure 1
Free- FreeFree
- Access to cases
- HIPAA-compliant
- Secure sharing
Signant Health
On request- SmartSignals Unified Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per study through a sales process
- Modules selected per protocol: EDC, eCOA, randomisation, eConsent, TeleVisits
- Instrument licensing paid to scale owners on top of platform cost
Which should you pick?
Choose Figure 1 if
- You need case sharing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want secure messaging.
Choose Signant Health if
- You need ecoa and epro.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want unified platform.
Questions people ask
- Is Figure 1 or Signant Health better?
- Neither clearly leads. Figure 1 starts at Free and Signant Health at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Figure 1 or Signant Health?
- Figure 1 has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Figure 1 and On request for Signant Health.
- Does Figure 1 or Signant Health run on more platforms?
- Figure 1 runs on Web, Mobile. Signant Health runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Figure 1 for free?
- Yes. Figure 1 has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Signant Health starts at On request.
- What is Figure 1 best used for?
- Figure 1 is most often used for patient care, medical records, practice management, telehealth. Of those, patient care and medical records are not what Signant Health is typically brought in for.
- What can Figure 1 do that Signant Health cannot?
- Figure 1 covers Case Sharing, Secure Messaging, Image Upload, Knowledge Discovery. Signant Health covers eCOA and ePRO, Unified platform, eConsent, Randomisation and supplies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Signant Health: What is Signant best at?
Electronic clinical outcome assessment, particularly rated scales in central nervous system and psychiatry trials, together with rater training and endpoint quality services.
Signant Health: Is pricing published?
No. Everything is quoted per study, and instrument licences, translations and devices sit on top of the platform cost.
Signant Health: Can I use it only for eCOA?
Yes. The modules are selected per protocol, and many sponsors take eCOA and eConsent while keeping an existing EDC.
Signant Health: What drives the timeline?
Translation and linguistic validation of outcome instruments, which is per language per instrument and sits on the critical path to study start.
Related pages
More on Signant Health
Other head to heads
- Figure 1 vs Athenahealth
- Figure 1 vs Epic Systems
- Figure 1 vs Cerner
- Figure 1 vs Amwell
- Figure 1 vs Ambra Health
- Figure 1 vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Figure 1 vs Aidoc
- Figure 1 vs Jane App
- Figure 1 vs Clue
- Figure 1 vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Figure 1 vs Kareo Clinical
- Figure 1 vs Practice Fusion
- Figure 1 vs Ro
- Figure 1 vs RXNT
- Figure 1 vs Sysmex
- Figure 1 vs Talkspace
- Figure 1 vs Epic MyChart
- Figure 1 vs OpenClinica
- Figure 1 vs Oracle Clinical One
- Figure 1 vs Visage Imaging
- Figure 1 vs PioneerRx
- Figure 1 vs OpenMRS
- Figure 1 vs Healthie
- Figure 1 vs Sectra
- Figure 1 vs DHIS2
- Figure 1 vs Flo
- Figure 1 vs Gleamer
- Figure 1 vs Included Health
- Signant Health vs Athenahealth
- Signant Health vs Epic Systems
- Signant Health vs Cerner
- Signant Health vs Amwell
- Signant Health vs Ambra Health
- Signant Health vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Signant Health vs Aidoc
- Signant Health vs Jane App
- Signant Health vs Clue
- Signant Health vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Signant Health vs Kareo Clinical
- Signant Health vs Practice Fusion
- Signant Health vs Ro
- Signant Health vs RXNT
- Signant Health vs Sysmex
- Signant Health vs Talkspace
- Signant Health vs Epic MyChart
- Signant Health vs OpenClinica
- Signant Health vs Oracle Clinical One
- Signant Health vs Visage Imaging
- Signant Health vs PioneerRx
- Signant Health vs OpenMRS
- Signant Health vs Healthie
- Signant Health vs Sectra
- Signant Health vs DHIS2
- Signant Health vs Flo
- Signant Health vs Gleamer
- Signant Health vs Included Health
