Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Qdrant
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Qdrant
Databases
High-performance vector database for similarity search and embedding-based retrieval
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Qdrant is an open-source vector search engine.
- Both are free.
- Where Fig falls short: the standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported.
- Where Qdrant falls short: free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Qdrant actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Freemium), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Qdrant.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Qdrant
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backends for LLM applicationsnot Fig
- Semantic search across large document corporanot Fig
- Multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systemsnot Fig
- Similarity-based product or content recommendationsnot Fig
- Real-time vector indexing for streaming embedding datanot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Qdrant
- Free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Standard and Premium pricing usage-based; specific costs not published; requires calculator or quote
- Requires understanding of embeddings and vector search concepts; not suitable for SQL-only teams
- Early-stage serverless offering (coming soon) suggests maturity gaps in that deployment model
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Qdrant
Free- FreeFree
- Single-node cluster
- 0.5 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- StandardOn request
- Dedicated resources
- Flexible scaling
- High availability
- PremiumOn request
- SSO and SAML
- Private VPC links
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Qdrant if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Browser extension, Serverless (coming).
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Qdrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Qdrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Qdrant?
- Fig starts at Free and Qdrant at Free.
- Does Fig or Qdrant run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Qdrant runs on Web, Self-hosted, Browser extension, Serverless (coming).
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Qdrant: Can I use Qdrant for free?
Yes, Qdrant offers a free tier that provides a single node cluster with 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 4GB disk space. It includes free cloud inference with selected models and is described as free forever for testing and prototypes.
SourceQdrant: How is Qdrant Cloud billing calculated?
Billing is calculated based on actual resource usage during each billing period. You are charged hourly for compute (vCPU), memory (GB), storage (GB), backups, and any paid inference tokens used.
SourceQdrant: What happens if I scale beyond the free tier?
The Standard Tier uses the same usage-based billing model as the free tier but adds features like dedicated resources with flexible scaling, highly available setups with backup and disaster recovery, and a 99.5% uptime SLA.
SourceQdrant: What SLA does Qdrant offer?
The Standard Tier provides 99.5% uptime SLA. The Premium Tier, which requires a minimum spend for enterprises, offers 99.9% uptime SLA along with single sign-on and private VPC links.
SourceQdrant: Are there dedicated cloud infrastructure options?
Yes, Qdrant offers Hybrid Cloud (runs on your infrastructure) and Private Cloud (complete isolation) options, both with custom pricing that requires contacting the sales team.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs GitLab
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Depot
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Helix
- Fig vs Refact
- Fig vs Restate
- Fig vs RubyMine
- Fig vs Soketi
- Fig vs SonarQube
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Zilliz
- Fig vs Chroma
- Fig vs Vespa
- Fig vs YugabyteDB
- Fig vs NATS
- Fig vs QuestDB
- Fig vs Cockroach Labs
- Fig vs Elasticsearch
- Fig vs Redis
- Fig vs Apache Druid
- Fig vs Meilisearch
- Fig vs Couchbase
- Fig vs SingleStore
- Fig vs TiDB
- Fig vs Tinybird
- Fig vs Typesense
- Fig vs Valkey
- Fig vs Apache Doris
- Qdrant vs Sweep
- Qdrant vs Cody
- Qdrant vs Warp
- Qdrant vs Visual Studio Code
- Qdrant vs CodeSandbox
- Qdrant vs GitLab
- Qdrant vs Keycloak
- Qdrant vs Vite
- Qdrant vs Daytona
- Qdrant vs Depot
- Qdrant vs ESLint
- Qdrant vs Helix
- Qdrant vs Refact
- Qdrant vs Restate
- Qdrant vs RubyMine
- Qdrant vs Soketi
- Qdrant vs SonarQube
- Qdrant vs Sourcegraph
- Qdrant vs Zilliz
- Qdrant vs Chroma
- Qdrant vs Vespa
- Qdrant vs YugabyteDB
- Qdrant vs NATS
- Qdrant vs QuestDB
- Qdrant vs Cockroach Labs
- Qdrant vs Elasticsearch
- Qdrant vs Redis
- Qdrant vs Apache Druid
- Qdrant vs Meilisearch
- Qdrant vs Couchbase
- Qdrant vs SingleStore
- Qdrant vs TiDB
- Qdrant vs Tinybird
- Qdrant vs Typesense
- Qdrant vs Valkey
- Qdrant vs Apache Doris
