Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Qdrant

Cody
Developer Tools
AI coding assistant powered by code search
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Qdrant
Databases
High-performance vector database for similarity search and embedding-based retrieval
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Qdrant is an open-source vector search engine.
- Both are free.
- Where Cody falls short: sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page.
- Where Qdrant falls short: free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Qdrant actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Freemium), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Qdrant.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Qdrant
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Qdrant
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Qdrant
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Qdrant
Qdrant
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backends for LLM applicationsnot Cody
- Semantic search across large document corporanot Cody
- Multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systemsnot Cody
- Similarity-based product or content recommendationsnot Cody
- Real-time vector indexing for streaming embedding datanot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Qdrant
- Free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Standard and Premium pricing usage-based; specific costs not published; requires calculator or quote
- Requires understanding of embeddings and vector search concepts; not suitable for SQL-only teams
- Early-stage serverless offering (coming soon) suggests maturity gaps in that deployment model
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Qdrant
Free- FreeFree
- Single-node cluster
- 0.5 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- StandardOn request
- Dedicated resources
- Flexible scaling
- High availability
- PremiumOn request
- SSO and SAML
- Private VPC links
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Qdrant if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Browser extension, Serverless (coming).
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Qdrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Qdrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Qdrant?
- Cody starts at Free and Qdrant at Free.
- Does Cody or Qdrant run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Qdrant runs on Web, Self-hosted, Browser extension, Serverless (coming).
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Qdrant is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceQdrant: Can I use Qdrant for free?
Yes, Qdrant offers a free tier that provides a single node cluster with 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 4GB disk space. It includes free cloud inference with selected models and is described as free forever for testing and prototypes.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceQdrant: How is Qdrant Cloud billing calculated?
Billing is calculated based on actual resource usage during each billing period. You are charged hourly for compute (vCPU), memory (GB), storage (GB), backups, and any paid inference tokens used.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceQdrant: What happens if I scale beyond the free tier?
The Standard Tier uses the same usage-based billing model as the free tier but adds features like dedicated resources with flexible scaling, highly available setups with backup and disaster recovery, and a 99.5% uptime SLA.
SourceQdrant: What SLA does Qdrant offer?
The Standard Tier provides 99.5% uptime SLA. The Premium Tier, which requires a minimum spend for enterprises, offers 99.9% uptime SLA along with single sign-on and private VPC links.
SourceQdrant: Are there dedicated cloud infrastructure options?
Yes, Qdrant offers Hybrid Cloud (runs on your infrastructure) and Private Cloud (complete isolation) options, both with custom pricing that requires contacting the sales team.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Warp
- Cody vs CodeSandbox
- Cody vs GitLab
- Cody vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cody vs Eclipse
- Cody vs Garden
- Cody vs HCP Terraform
- Cody vs Helm
- Cody vs Jenkins
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs GitLab CI/CD
- Cody vs Zilliz
- Cody vs Chroma
- Cody vs Vespa
- Cody vs YugabyteDB
- Cody vs NATS
- Cody vs QuestDB
- Cody vs Cockroach Labs
- Cody vs Elasticsearch
- Cody vs Redis
- Cody vs Apache Druid
- Cody vs Meilisearch
- Cody vs Couchbase
- Cody vs SingleStore
- Cody vs TiDB
- Cody vs Tinybird
- Cody vs Typesense
- Cody vs Valkey
- Cody vs Apache Doris
- Qdrant vs Sourcegraph
- Qdrant vs Sweep
- Qdrant vs Deep Code
- Qdrant vs GitHub Copilot
- Qdrant vs Bazel
- Qdrant vs Fig
- Qdrant vs GoLand
- Qdrant vs Warp
- Qdrant vs CodeSandbox
- Qdrant vs GitLab
- Qdrant vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Qdrant vs Eclipse
- Qdrant vs Garden
- Qdrant vs HCP Terraform
- Qdrant vs Helm
- Qdrant vs Jenkins
- Qdrant vs PhpStorm
- Qdrant vs GitLab CI/CD
- Qdrant vs Zilliz
- Qdrant vs Chroma
- Qdrant vs Vespa
- Qdrant vs YugabyteDB
- Qdrant vs NATS
- Qdrant vs QuestDB
- Qdrant vs Cockroach Labs
- Qdrant vs Elasticsearch
- Qdrant vs Redis
- Qdrant vs Apache Druid
- Qdrant vs Meilisearch
- Qdrant vs Couchbase
- Qdrant vs SingleStore
- Qdrant vs TiDB
- Qdrant vs Tinybird
- Qdrant vs Typesense
- Qdrant vs Valkey
- Qdrant vs Apache Doris
