Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs SingleStore
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

SingleStore
Databases
The real-time distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Fig is free; SingleStore starts at $0.99/mo.
- Where Fig falls short: the standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported.
- Where SingleStore falls short: high licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and SingleStore actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fig | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Self-Managed |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for SingleStore.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that SingleStore does not also cover.
Only in SingleStore
- Real-time Analytics
- Fast Data Ingest
- In-memory Processing
- Distributed Architecture
- MySQL Compatible
- Columnar Storage
- Vector Search
- Kafka
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
SingleStore
- Transaction processingnot Fig
- Data storagenot Fig
- Application backendnot Fig
- Reportingnot Fig
- Data analyticsnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
SingleStore
- High licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- Eventual consistency in replication: secondary replicas may lag during high write loads
- Complex operational setup requiring specialized knowledge for optimization
- Vendor lock-in due to proprietary technology without open-source alternatives
- Disorganized documentation and lack of online training resources
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
SingleStore
Free- Free Tier$0.99/mo
- Usage-based pricing
- Limited resources
Which should you pick?
Choose SingleStore if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-Managed.
- You also want fast data ingest.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or SingleStore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and SingleStore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or SingleStore?
- Fig starts at Free and SingleStore at Free.
- Does Fig or SingleStore run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. SingleStore runs on Web, Self-Managed.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that SingleStore cannot?
- SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics, Fast Data Ingest, In-memory Processing, Distributed Architecture.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SingleStore: Does SingleStore offer a free tier?
Yes, SingleStore offers a free tier starting from $0.99/month with usage-based pricing. The free tier allows developers to evaluate the platform with limited resources before scaling to production workloads.
SourceSingleStore: Can SingleStore handle both transactional and analytical workloads?
Yes, SingleStore is a hybrid transactional/analytical processing (HTAP) database that combines operational (OLTP) and analytical (OLAP) workloads in a single unified engine, eliminating the need for separate systems.
SourceSingleStore: Does SingleStore integrate with Apache Spark?
Yes, SingleStore provides the Spark Connector 3.0 for bidirectional data integration with Apache Spark. The connector supports SQL, Python, Scala, Java, and R for data loading and extraction.
SourceSingleStore: Can SingleStore ingest data from Kafka?
Yes, SingleStore supports high-throughput streaming ingestion from Apache Kafka and other sources, enabling millions of events per second without requiring ETL pipelines or data movement.
SourceSingleStore: Is SingleStore available as cloud or self-managed?
SingleStore offers both deployment options: SingleStoreDB Cloud (managed service) and SingleStore Self-Managed for on-premises or private cloud deployments. The managed service handles infrastructure, scaling, and maintenance automatically.
SourceRelated pages
More on SingleStore
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs GitLab
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Depot
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Helix
- Fig vs Refact
- Fig vs Restate
- Fig vs RubyMine
- Fig vs Soketi
- Fig vs SonarQube
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Apache Druid
- Fig vs ClickHouse
- Fig vs Redis
- Fig vs DuckDB
- Fig vs Elasticsearch
- Fig vs TiDB
- Fig vs Materialize
- Fig vs TimescaleDB
- Fig vs Estuary
- Fig vs Fivetran HVR
- Fig vs ArangoDB
- Fig vs Canary Labs
- Fig vs Chroma
- Fig vs Cloudinary
- Fig vs Convex
- Fig vs Dgraph
- Fig vs Apache Pinot
- Fig vs Apache Flink
- SingleStore vs Sweep
- SingleStore vs Cody
- SingleStore vs Warp
- SingleStore vs Visual Studio Code
- SingleStore vs CodeSandbox
- SingleStore vs GitLab
- SingleStore vs Keycloak
- SingleStore vs Vite
- SingleStore vs Daytona
- SingleStore vs Depot
- SingleStore vs ESLint
- SingleStore vs Helix
- SingleStore vs Refact
- SingleStore vs Restate
- SingleStore vs RubyMine
- SingleStore vs Soketi
- SingleStore vs SonarQube
- SingleStore vs Sourcegraph
- SingleStore vs Apache Druid
- SingleStore vs ClickHouse
- SingleStore vs Redis
- SingleStore vs DuckDB
- SingleStore vs Elasticsearch
- SingleStore vs TiDB
- SingleStore vs Materialize
- SingleStore vs TimescaleDB
- SingleStore vs Estuary
- SingleStore vs Fivetran HVR
- SingleStore vs ArangoDB
- SingleStore vs Canary Labs
- SingleStore vs Chroma
- SingleStore vs Cloudinary
- SingleStore vs Convex
- SingleStore vs Dgraph
- SingleStore vs Apache Pinot
- SingleStore vs Apache Flink
