Databases · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Qdrant

Qdrant
Databases
High-performance vector database for similarity search and embedding-based retrieval
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); Qdrant free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Qdrant actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming) |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in Qdrant
Nothing recorded that Cockroach Labs does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Qdrant
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Qdrant
Qdrant
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backends for LLM applicationsnot Cockroach Labs
- Semantic search across large document corporanot Cockroach Labs
- Multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systemsnot Cockroach Labs
- Similarity-based product or content recommendationsnot Cockroach Labs
- Real-time vector indexing for streaming embedding datanot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Qdrant
- Free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Standard and Premium pricing usage-based; specific costs not published; requires calculator or quote
- Requires understanding of embeddings and vector search concepts; not suitable for SQL-only teams
- Early-stage serverless offering (coming soon) suggests maturity gaps in that deployment model
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Qdrant
Free- FreeFree
- Single-node cluster
- 0.5 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- Standard$undefined/usage-based
- Dedicated resources
- Flexible scaling
- High availability
- Premium$undefined/minimum spend
- SSO and SAML
- Private VPC links
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Qdrant if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Qdrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Qdrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Qdrant?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Qdrant at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Qdrant run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Qdrant runs on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Qdrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Qdrant cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cockroach Labs: What does the free Basic tier include?
The Basic tier is free and includes 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month, with a maximum compute of 30K RU/sec. No credit card is required to start.
SourceQdrant: Can I use Qdrant for free?
Yes, Qdrant offers a free tier that provides a single node cluster with 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 4GB disk space. It includes free cloud inference with selected models and is described as free forever for testing and prototypes.
SourceCockroach Labs: How much do the paid tiers cost?
Standard tier starts at $0.18 per hour for 2 vCPUs, and Advanced tier starts at $0.60 per hour for 4 vCPUs. Both tiers support additional resources with higher costs for increased compute and storage.
SourceQdrant: How is Qdrant Cloud billing calculated?
Billing is calculated based on actual resource usage during each billing period. You are charged hourly for compute (vCPU), memory (GB), storage (GB), backups, and any paid inference tokens used.
SourceCockroach Labs: What are the storage limits for each tier?
Basic plan supports up to 3 TiB storage, Standard tier up to 3 TiB, and Advanced tier up to 10 TiB per node with unlimited total storage.
SourceQdrant: What happens if I scale beyond the free tier?
The Standard Tier uses the same usage-based billing model as the free tier but adds features like dedicated resources with flexible scaling, highly available setups with backup and disaster recovery, and a 99.5% uptime SLA.
SourceCockroach Labs: Can I get trial credits before paying?
Yes, new users can try CockroachDB free with $400 in credits. The Basic and Standard plans do not require a credit card to start.
SourceQdrant: What SLA does Qdrant offer?
The Standard Tier provides 99.5% uptime SLA. The Premium Tier, which requires a minimum spend for enterprises, offers 99.9% uptime SLA along with single sign-on and private VPC links.
SourceCockroach Labs: Do legacy contracts have different pricing?
Customers with annual or multi-year contracts entered before December 1, 2024 can view legacy pricing terms on a separate page, which apply until their contract renewal date.
SourceQdrant: Are there dedicated cloud infrastructure options?
Yes, Qdrant offers Hybrid Cloud (runs on your infrastructure) and Private Cloud (complete isolation) options, both with custom pricing that requires contacting the sales team.
SourceRelated pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs Google Cloud SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs TiDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Dgraph
- Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DataStax
- Cockroach Labs vs Neo4j
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Materialize
- Cockroach Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Turso
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Zilliz
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Chroma
- Cockroach Labs vs Vespa
- Cockroach Labs vs NATS
- Cockroach Labs vs QuestDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Grist
- Cockroach Labs vs IBM Db2
- Cockroach Labs vs Instaclustr
- Cockroach Labs vs Knack
- Cockroach Labs vs LanceDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Marqo
- Qdrant vs YugabyteDB
- Qdrant vs PostgreSQL
- Qdrant vs Couchbase
- Qdrant vs Google Cloud SQL
- Qdrant vs Amazon Aurora
- Qdrant vs Elasticsearch
- Qdrant vs Oracle Database
- Qdrant vs TiDB
- Qdrant vs Dgraph
- Qdrant vs CosmosDB
- Qdrant vs DataStax
- Qdrant vs Neo4j
- Qdrant vs MariaDB
- Qdrant vs Materialize
- Qdrant vs TimescaleDB
- Qdrant vs Turso
- Qdrant vs Amazon RDS
- Qdrant vs Zilliz
- Qdrant vs Airtable
- Qdrant vs Chroma
- Qdrant vs Vespa
- Qdrant vs NATS
- Qdrant vs QuestDB
- Qdrant vs Apache Druid
- Qdrant vs Grist
- Qdrant vs IBM Db2
- Qdrant vs Instaclustr
- Qdrant vs Knack
- Qdrant vs LanceDB
- Qdrant vs Marqo

