Cloud · head to head
Microsoft Azure vs OpenEBS
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft Azure the 12 months of free services is available only to new customers who have not previously had an Azure account or received 12 months of free services; OpenEBS there is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft Azure covers Virtual Machines, OpenEBS covers Replicated engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft Azure and OpenEBS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft Azure | OpenEBS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Desktop, Mobile | Linux |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft Azure
- Virtual Machines
- App Service
- SQL Database
- Blob Storage
- Azure Cosmos DB
- Functions
- Service Fabric
- API Management
Only in OpenEBS
- Replicated engine
- Local PV engines
- Kubernetes-native management
- Snapshots and clones
- No licence fee
- Hardware independence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft Azure
- Cloud infrastructure and computingnot OpenEBS
- Database and storage servicesnot OpenEBS
- AI and machine learning servicesnot OpenEBS
- Enterprise application hostingnot OpenEBS
OpenEBS
- Running Cassandra or Kafka on Kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficientnot Microsoft Azure
- A platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal Kubernetes without a per node subscriptionnot Microsoft Azure
- An edge or lab deployment where a commercial storage licence cannot be justifiednot Microsoft Azure
- Replacing hostpath volumes with something that has snapshots and a Container Storage Interface drivernot Microsoft Azure
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft Azure
- The 12 months of free services is available only to new customers who have not previously had an Azure account or received 12 months of free services
- The 12 months free offer is not available to customers who sign up directly for pay as you go in China and India
- Customers who try Azure free must move to pay as you go within 30 days to keep receiving the 12 months of free services
- Free services are capped at specified monthly amounts, and only some of them are always free
OpenEBS
- There is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.
- The project has several storage engines with different maturity and different operational characteristics, and choosing the wrong one for your workload produces poor results that look like a product failure.
- Documentation and upgrade guidance assume real Kubernetes storage knowledge, so teams without that expertise underestimate the operational load they are taking on.
- Project governance shifted after DataCore acquired MayaData in 2021, which means the direction of a supposedly neutral project is influenced by one commercial sponsor.
- Disaster recovery, cross-cluster replication and policy-driven data services are thinner than in the commercial alternatives, so organisations with those requirements end up building them or buying a product anyway.
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft Azure
Free- Free AccountFree
- $200 credit for 30 days
- Popular services 12 months free
- 40+ services always free
OpenEBS
Free- OpenEBSFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All storage engines included
- No node or capacity limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Azure if
- You need virtual machines.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want app service.
Choose OpenEBS if
- You need replicated engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want local pv engines.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft Azure or OpenEBS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft Azure starts at Free and OpenEBS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft Azure or OpenEBS?
- Microsoft Azure starts at Free and OpenEBS at Free.
- Does Microsoft Azure or OpenEBS run on more platforms?
- Microsoft Azure runs on Web, Api, Desktop, Mobile. OpenEBS runs on Linux.
- Can I use Microsoft Azure for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Microsoft Azure best used for?
- Microsoft Azure is most often used for cloud infrastructure and computing, database and storage services, ai and machine learning services, enterprise application hosting. Of those, cloud infrastructure and computing and database and storage services are not what OpenEBS is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft Azure do that OpenEBS cannot?
- Microsoft Azure covers Virtual Machines, App Service, SQL Database, Blob Storage. OpenEBS covers Replicated engine, Local PV engines, Kubernetes-native management, Snapshots and clones.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Azure: How much does Microsoft Azure cost?
Azure uses consumption-based pricing where you pay only for resources used and scale as you grow, with no fixed monthly fee. Prices are listed in USD globally, and pricing varies by service, region, and usage patterns.
SourceOpenEBS: Who supports it in production?
The project is community supported. Commercial support is available from DataCore, which acquired the original sponsor MayaData in 2021. Establish that relationship before production, not during an incident.
Microsoft Azure: How can I save money on Azure services?
Azure offers savings up to 65% on select compute services through Azure Savings Plans with one- or three-year commitments. Using Azure Hybrid Benefit with existing Windows Server and SQL Server licenses plus reservations can save up to 85% compared to standard rates.
SourceOpenEBS: Which engine should we use?
If your application replicates its own data, use a Local engine and avoid replicating twice. If it does not, such as with PostgreSQL, use the Replicated engine.
Microsoft Azure: Does Azure offer a free tier?
Azure provides free tier services for new users and perpetually free options, including free Spot Virtual Machines, dev/test pricing for development workloads, and access to the Azure Pricing Calculator to estimate monthly costs before deployment.
SourceOpenEBS: Does it cost anything?
No licence fee. The cost is operational, and a support contract if you want someone accountable.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Azure
Other head to heads
- Microsoft Azure vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Microsoft Azure vs DigitalOcean
- Microsoft Azure vs Grafana Cloud
- Microsoft Azure vs Neon
- Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud Platform
- Microsoft Azure vs Hetzner Cloud
- Microsoft Azure vs Linode
- Microsoft Azure vs Vultr
- Microsoft Azure vs Encore
- Microsoft Azure vs IBM Cloud
- Microsoft Azure vs Zeabur
- Microsoft Azure vs Nomad
- Microsoft Azure vs OVHcloud
- Microsoft Azure vs Puppet
- Microsoft Azure vs Qovery
- Microsoft Azure vs Scaleway
- Microsoft Azure vs Skopeo
- Microsoft Azure vs Portworx
- Microsoft Azure vs Rancher
- Microsoft Azure vs Longhorn
- Microsoft Azure vs Podman
- Microsoft Azure vs Caddy
- Microsoft Azure vs Cerebrium
- Microsoft Azure vs DeepInfra
- Microsoft Azure vs Go
- Microsoft Azure vs Proxmox VE
- Microsoft Azure vs K3s
- Microsoft Azure vs Rook
- Microsoft Azure vs containerd
- Microsoft Azure vs minikube
- Microsoft Azure vs Cilium
- Microsoft Azure vs Flux
- Microsoft Azure vs Linkerd
- OpenEBS vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- OpenEBS vs DigitalOcean
- OpenEBS vs Grafana Cloud
- OpenEBS vs Neon
- OpenEBS vs Google Cloud Platform
- OpenEBS vs Hetzner Cloud
- OpenEBS vs Linode
- OpenEBS vs Vultr
- OpenEBS vs Encore
- OpenEBS vs IBM Cloud
- OpenEBS vs Zeabur
- OpenEBS vs Nomad
- OpenEBS vs OVHcloud
- OpenEBS vs Puppet
- OpenEBS vs Qovery
- OpenEBS vs Scaleway
- OpenEBS vs Skopeo
- OpenEBS vs Portworx
- OpenEBS vs Rancher
- OpenEBS vs Longhorn
- OpenEBS vs Podman
- OpenEBS vs Caddy
- OpenEBS vs Cerebrium
- OpenEBS vs DeepInfra
- OpenEBS vs Go
- OpenEBS vs Proxmox VE
- OpenEBS vs K3s
- OpenEBS vs Rook
- OpenEBS vs containerd
- OpenEBS vs minikube
- OpenEBS vs Cilium
- OpenEBS vs Flux
- OpenEBS vs Linkerd


