Databases · head to head
FaunaDB vs Hasura

FaunaDB
Databases
Document-relational database whose hosted service closed in 2025 and whose core is now unmaintained Apache 2.0 code.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Hasura
APIs
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FaunaDB the hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.; Hasura active model definition: model/command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly
- They diverge on capability: FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, Hasura covers GraphQL API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FaunaDB and Hasura actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FaunaDB
- Document-relational model
- FQL v10
- Distributed ACID transactions
- HTTPS access
- User-defined functions
- Attribute-based access control
- Document history
- Event streaming
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Webhooks
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FaunaDB
- Keeping an existing Fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and fundednot Hasura
- Extracting historical data from a Fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted APInot Hasura
- Studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under Apache 2.0not Hasura
- Forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has JVM and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controlsnot Hasura
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot FaunaDB
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot FaunaDB
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot FaunaDB
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot FaunaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FaunaDB
- The hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.
- The open-sourced repository has had no substantive activity since May 2025 and the drivers were frozen alongside it, so you inherit responsibility for security patches in a Scala distributed database that almost nobody else is running.
- FQL has no wire or dialect compatibility with anything else, so migrating off is a rewrite of every query, index and access rule in the application rather than a data export.
- No BI tool, ORM or CDC connector speaks FQL, so reporting and analytics always required exporting the data first, and that export tooling is now also unmaintained.
- The community was small before the shutdown and has dispersed since, so operational answers, tuning advice and people who have run a Fauna cluster in anger are all scarce when something breaks.
Hasura
- Active model definition: model/command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly
- Private DDN requires Base or Advanced plan
Pricing, plan by plan
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Hasura
Free- DDN FreeFree
- Unlimited models
- 1 supergraph developer
- 15-minute observability retention
- DDN Base$5/month
- Per active model billing
- Unlimited developers
- 30-day observability retention
- DDN Advanced$30/month
- Per active model billing
- Federated collaboration
- Multi-repo CI/CD
Which should you pick?
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need document-relational model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want fql v10.
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Questions people ask
- Is FaunaDB or Hasura better?
- Neither clearly leads. FaunaDB starts at Free and Hasura at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FaunaDB or Hasura?
- FaunaDB starts at Free and Hasura at Free.
- Does FaunaDB or Hasura run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use FaunaDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FaunaDB best used for?
- FaunaDB is most often used for keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded, extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api, studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under apache 2.0, forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has jvm and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controls. Of those, keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded and extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api are not what Hasura is typically brought in for.
- What can FaunaDB do that Hasura cannot?
- FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, FQL v10, Distributed ACID transactions, HTTPS access. Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FaunaDB: Can I still sign up for Fauna as a service?
No. Fauna Inc. wound down the hosted service in 2025 and the company website is no longer serving. The only way to run Fauna now is to build and operate the open-sourced server yourself.
Hasura: How much does Hasura cost?
Hasura DDN Free is free. DDN Base starts at $5/active model/month, and DDN Advanced starts at $30/active model/month.
SourceFaunaDB: What licence is the open-sourced code under?
Apache 2.0, with the copyright held by a FaunaDB Foundation. That is a permissive OSI licence with no competing-use clause, so you may run it, modify it and even offer it as a service.
Hasura: What is an active model in Hasura pricing?
An active model is defined as any model or command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly.
SourceFaunaDB: Is the open source version the same software that ran the cloud?
It is the core database engine. The control plane, billing, dashboard and multi-tenant operational tooling that made it a service are not part of the release, so you are running the engine, not the product.
Hasura: Is there a free version of Hasura?
Yes, Hasura DDN Free is always free and includes unlimited models, 1 supergraph developer, and 15-minute observability retention.
SourceFaunaDB: What should I migrate to?
There is no drop-in target. Teams that valued the document model with relationships usually land on Postgres with JSONB, and teams that valued the serverless HTTP access pattern usually land on DynamoDB or a managed Postgres with an HTTP driver. Either way the query layer is rewritten.
FaunaDB: How hard is it to self-host?
It builds as a fat JAR and runs as a multi-node JVM cluster. There is an OPERATING.md, but no supported packaging, no operator, no upstream releases and no support contract, so budget for a distributed-systems engineer, not a container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs BigQuery
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs CosmosDB
- FaunaDB vs ArangoDB
- FaunaDB vs Dgraph
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pinot
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pulsar
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs PocketBase
- FaunaDB vs Parse Server
- FaunaDB vs Appwrite
- FaunaDB vs GraphQL Apollo
- FaunaDB vs GraphQL Playground
- FaunaDB vs Directus
- FaunaDB vs Asyncapi
- FaunaDB vs Janus Gateway
- FaunaDB vs Strapi
- FaunaDB vs Gravitee
- FaunaDB vs Bruno
- FaunaDB vs KeystoneJS
- FaunaDB vs Lithic
- FaunaDB vs Stoplight
- FaunaDB vs Swan
- FaunaDB vs Temenos Transact
- FaunaDB vs Token.io
- FaunaDB vs Treasury Prime
- Hasura vs Amazon Aurora
- Hasura vs PostgreSQL
- Hasura vs Airtable
- Hasura vs Cockroach Labs
- Hasura vs BigQuery
- Hasura vs CouchDB
- Hasura vs CosmosDB
- Hasura vs ArangoDB
- Hasura vs Dgraph
- Hasura vs DynamoDB
- Hasura vs Google Cloud SQL
- Hasura vs Apache Pinot
- Hasura vs Amazon RDS
- Hasura vs Apache Pulsar
- Hasura vs Cassandra
- Hasura vs Amazon Redshift
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs GraphQL Apollo
- Hasura vs GraphQL Playground
- Hasura vs Directus
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs Janus Gateway
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Gravitee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Lithic
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Swan
- Hasura vs Temenos Transact
- Hasura vs Token.io
- Hasura vs Treasury Prime
