Databases · head to head
Apache Pinot vs Hasura

Apache Pinot
Databases
Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Hasura
APIs
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service; Hasura active model definition: model/command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Hasura covers GraphQL API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pinot and Hasura actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pinot | Hasura |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Web |
| Category | Databases | APIs |
| Founded | 1999 | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pinot
- Real-time Analytics
- Column-oriented
- Distributed Processing
- SQL Support
- Pluggable Indexing
- Star-tree Index
- Upsert Support
- Kafka
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Webhooks
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
Both cover
- Docker support
- Kubernetes support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pinot
- Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot Hasura
- User-facing dashboards inside a productnot Hasura
- Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot Hasura
- Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot Hasura
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot Apache Pinot
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot Apache Pinot
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot Apache Pinot
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot Apache Pinot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pinot
- Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
- Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
- Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database
Hasura
- Active model definition: model/command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly
- Private DDN requires Base or Advanced plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pinot
Free- Open SourceFree
- Real-time analytics
- SQL queries
- Horizontal scaling
Hasura
Free- DDN FreeFree
- Unlimited models
- 1 supergraph developer
- 15-minute observability retention
- DDN Base$5/month
- Per active model billing
- Unlimited developers
- 30-day observability retention
- DDN Advanced$30/month
- Per active model billing
- Federated collaboration
- Multi-repo CI/CD
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pinot if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want column-oriented.
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pinot or Hasura better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pinot starts at Free and Hasura at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pinot or Hasura?
- Apache Pinot starts at Free and Hasura at Free.
- Does Apache Pinot or Hasura run on more platforms?
- Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Hasura runs on Web.
- Can I use Apache Pinot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Pinot best used for?
- Apache Pinot is most often used for sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data, user-facing dashboards inside a product, real-time metrics at high ingest rates, petabyte-scale analytics as run at linkedin and uber. Of those, sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data and user-facing dashboards inside a product are not what Hasura is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pinot do that Hasura cannot?
- Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support. Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL. Both handle Docker support, Kubernetes support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pinot: How much does Apache Pinot cost?
Apache Pinot is free and open-source. It is provided under the Apache License, which allows free use, modification, and distribution.
SourceHasura: How much does Hasura cost?
Hasura DDN Free is free. DDN Base starts at $5/active model/month, and DDN Advanced starts at $30/active model/month.
SourceApache Pinot: Is Apache Pinot free for commercial use?
Yes. Apache Pinot is licensed under the Apache License, which explicitly permits commercial use at no cost.
SourceHasura: What is an active model in Hasura pricing?
An active model is defined as any model or command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly.
SourceApache Pinot: Can I run Apache Pinot locally or with Docker?
Yes. Apache Pinot offers a Docker quickstart and free downloads of the latest version (1.5.1 at the time of the page). You are responsible for hosting and infrastructure.
SourceHasura: Is there a free version of Hasura?
Yes, Hasura DDN Free is always free and includes unlimited models, 1 supergraph developer, and 15-minute observability retention.
SourceApache Pinot: Are there restrictions on how I can use Apache Pinot?
The Apache License permits unrestricted use, but requires retention of license notices and statements. No usage limits or feature restrictions are enforced.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Pinot
Other head to heads
- Apache Pinot vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pinot vs Tinybird
- Apache Pinot vs Airtable
- Apache Pinot vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Pinot vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Pinot vs SingleStore
- Apache Pinot vs DuckDB
- Apache Pinot vs Firebolt
- Apache Pinot vs Estuary
- Apache Pinot vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Pinot vs Materialize
- Apache Pinot vs DataGrip
- Apache Pinot vs Google Cloud SQL
- Apache Pinot vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Pinot vs QuestDB
- Apache Pinot vs PocketBase
- Apache Pinot vs Parse Server
- Apache Pinot vs Appwrite
- Apache Pinot vs GraphQL Apollo
- Apache Pinot vs GraphQL Playground
- Apache Pinot vs Directus
- Apache Pinot vs Asyncapi
- Apache Pinot vs Janus Gateway
- Apache Pinot vs Strapi
- Apache Pinot vs Gravitee
- Apache Pinot vs Bruno
- Apache Pinot vs KeystoneJS
- Apache Pinot vs Lithic
- Apache Pinot vs Stoplight
- Apache Pinot vs Swan
- Apache Pinot vs Temenos Transact
- Apache Pinot vs Token.io
- Apache Pinot vs Treasury Prime
- Hasura vs ClickHouse
- Hasura vs Tinybird
- Hasura vs Airtable
- Hasura vs Cockroach Labs
- Hasura vs PostgreSQL
- Hasura vs Amazon Aurora
- Hasura vs SingleStore
- Hasura vs DuckDB
- Hasura vs Firebolt
- Hasura vs Estuary
- Hasura vs TimescaleDB
- Hasura vs Materialize
- Hasura vs DataGrip
- Hasura vs Google Cloud SQL
- Hasura vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Hasura vs QuestDB
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs GraphQL Apollo
- Hasura vs GraphQL Playground
- Hasura vs Directus
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs Janus Gateway
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Gravitee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Lithic
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Swan
- Hasura vs Temenos Transact
- Hasura vs Token.io
- Hasura vs Treasury Prime
