Software · head to head
Fathom vs Hubstaff

Hubstaff
Software
Time tracking and team management for remote teams
- From
- $5.99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fathom has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fathom team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing; Hubstaff billed per seat; the pricing page's own proration example states the Team plan costs $10 per seat per month, with fees adjusted when seats are added or removed mid-cycle
- They diverge on capability: Fathom covers Auto-recording, Hubstaff covers Time tracking with timer.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fathom and Hubstaff actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fathom
- Auto-recording
- AI summaries
- Transcription
- Highlight clips
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
Only in Hubstaff
- Time tracking with timer
- Activity monitoring
- GPS location tracking
- Screenshots
- Reports and analytics
- Invoicing
- Team management
- Mobile apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fathom
- AI-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionalsnot Hubstaff
- Meeting analysis with AI scorecards and action item generation that syncs to CRMsnot Hubstaff
Hubstaff
- Productivitynot Fathom
- Collaborationnot Fathom
- Task managementnot Fathom
- Organizationnot Fathom
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fathom
- Team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- CRM field sync and deal view summaries available only on Business plan ($34/user/month) and above
Hubstaff
- Billed per seat; the pricing page's own proration example states the Team plan costs $10 per seat per month, with fees adjusted when seats are added or removed mid-cycle
Pricing, plan by plan
Fathom
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fathom review.
Hubstaff
$5.99/month- FreeFree
- Basic time tracking
- Limited to 1 user
- Basic reports
- Starter$5.99/month
- Time tracking
- Team management
- Reports
- Pro$9.99/month
- Everything in Starter
- GPS tracking
- Activity monitoring
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom if
- You need auto-recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- You also want ai summaries.
Choose Hubstaff if
- You need time tracking with timer.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android, MacOS, Windows.
- You also want activity monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Fathom or Hubstaff better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fathom starts at Free and Hubstaff at $5.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fathom or Hubstaff?
- Fathom has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fathom and $5.99/month for Hubstaff.
- Does Fathom or Hubstaff run on more platforms?
- Fathom runs on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. Hubstaff runs on Web, IOS, Android, MacOS, Windows.
- Can I use Fathom for free?
- Yes. Fathom has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Hubstaff starts at $5.99/month.
- What is Fathom best used for?
- Fathom is most often used for ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals, meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms. Of those, ai-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionals and meeting analysis with ai scorecards and action item generation that syncs to crms are not what Hubstaff is typically brought in for.
- What can Fathom do that Hubstaff cannot?
- Fathom covers Auto-recording, AI summaries, Transcription, Highlight clips. Hubstaff covers Time tracking with timer, Activity monitoring, GPS location tracking, Screenshots.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fathom vs Pika
- Fathom vs Anthropic API
- Fathom vs D-ID
- Fathom vs Stable Diffusion
- Fathom vs AI21 Labs
- Fathom vs ChatGPT
- Fathom vs Copy.ai
- Fathom vs HeyGen
- Fathom vs Jasper
- Fathom vs Leonardo AI
- Fathom vs Murf
- Fathom vs Perplexity
- Fathom vs Pi
- Fathom vs Play.ht
- Fathom vs Replicate
- Fathom vs Replika
- Fathom vs Rytr
- Fathom vs Together AI
- Fathom vs Todoist
- Fathom vs Things 3
- Fathom vs OmniFocus 3
- Fathom vs Brain.fm
- Fathom vs TickTick
- Fathom vs Akiflow
- Fathom vs Any.do
- Fathom vs Focus@Will
- Fathom vs Forest
- Fathom vs Google Workspace
- Fathom vs Remember The Milk
- Fathom vs Structured
- Fathom vs Tana
- Fathom vs Time Doctor
- Fathom vs 7-Zip
- Fathom vs Bear
- Fathom vs Bear Notes
- Fathom vs BoldSign
- Hubstaff vs Pika
- Hubstaff vs Anthropic API
- Hubstaff vs D-ID
- Hubstaff vs Stable Diffusion
- Hubstaff vs AI21 Labs
- Hubstaff vs ChatGPT
- Hubstaff vs Copy.ai
- Hubstaff vs HeyGen
- Hubstaff vs Jasper
- Hubstaff vs Leonardo AI
- Hubstaff vs Murf
- Hubstaff vs Perplexity
- Hubstaff vs Pi
- Hubstaff vs Play.ht
- Hubstaff vs Replicate
- Hubstaff vs Replika
- Hubstaff vs Rytr
- Hubstaff vs Together AI
- Hubstaff vs Todoist
- Hubstaff vs Things 3
- Hubstaff vs OmniFocus 3
- Hubstaff vs Brain.fm
- Hubstaff vs TickTick
- Hubstaff vs Akiflow
- Hubstaff vs Any.do
- Hubstaff vs Focus@Will
- Hubstaff vs Forest
- Hubstaff vs Google Workspace
- Hubstaff vs Remember The Milk
- Hubstaff vs Structured
- Hubstaff vs Tana
- Hubstaff vs Time Doctor
- Hubstaff vs 7-Zip
- Hubstaff vs Bear
- Hubstaff vs Bear Notes
- Hubstaff vs BoldSign

