Cybersecurity · head to head
Falco vs Mark43

Falco
Cybersecurity
CNCF-graduated runtime threat detection for Linux and Kubernetes using eBPF
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Falco has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Falco falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.; Mark43 no published pricing on homepage; sales contact required for all cost details
- They diverge on capability: Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, Mark43 covers Computer-Aided Dispatch.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Falco and Mark43 actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Falco
- eBPF kernel instrumentation
- System call rules engine
- Container and Kubernetes context
- Default rule set
- Falcosidekick
- Falco Talon
- Plugins framework
- DaemonSet deployment
Only in Mark43
- Computer-Aided Dispatch
- Records Management
- Evidence Management
- Analytics
- Mobile
- FBI CJIS
- NCIC
- State Systems
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Falco
- A platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtimenot Mark43
- A regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on Kubernetes nodes for an auditnot Mark43
- A security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agentnot Mark43
- A cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch itnot Mark43
Mark43
- Citizen Servicesnot Falco
- Records Managementnot Falco
- Public Safetynot Falco
- Civic Engagementnot Falco
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Falco
- Falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.
- The default rule set is noisy in real clusters and generates a large volume of benign matches from normal operational activity; without weeks of tuning, alert fatigue sets in and the team stops reading the feed, which is the usual failure mode.
- There is no storage, console, search or case management in the project, so a working detection capability means also running Falcosidekick, an event store, a dashboard and alert routing, all of which you build, host and maintain.
- The modern eBPF driver requires kernel 5.8 or later; older hosts fall back to the legacy probe or the kernel module, which brings driver-building against kernel headers and the operational fragility that comes with it on every kernel upgrade.
- Per-node syscall instrumentation carries measurable CPU overhead on busy hosts, and the cost scales with syscall volume rather than with cluster size, so the noisiest and most performance-sensitive workloads are exactly the ones that feel it most.
Mark43
- No published pricing on homepage; sales contact required for all cost details
- Only reference to pricing is 'early bird pricing' for 2027 conference registration
- No transparent pricing structure visible for public evaluation
Pricing, plan by plan
Falco
Free- Falco (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence, CNCF graduated project
- eBPF and kernel module drivers
- Full rules engine and default rule set
Mark43
$2000/month- Public Safety Suite$2000/month
- CAD
- RMS
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Falco if
- You need ebpf kernel instrumentation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want system call rules engine.
Choose Mark43 if
- You need computer-aided dispatch.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want records management.
Questions people ask
- Is Falco or Mark43 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Falco starts at Free and Mark43 at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Falco or Mark43?
- Falco has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Falco and $2000/month for Mark43.
- Does Falco or Mark43 run on more platforms?
- Falco runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Mark43 runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Falco for free?
- Yes. Falco has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Mark43 starts at $2000/month.
- What is Falco best used for?
- Falco is most often used for a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime, a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit, a security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agent, a cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch it. Of those, a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime and a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit are not what Mark43 is typically brought in for.
- What can Falco do that Mark43 cannot?
- Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, System call rules engine, Container and Kubernetes context, Default rule set. Mark43 covers Computer-Aided Dispatch, Records Management, Evidence Management, Analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Falco: Does Falco block attacks?
No. It detects and emits events. Response requires Falco Talon or your own automation on top.
Mark43: Does Mark43 publish pricing online?
No, Mark43 pricing is not published on the public website. The only pricing reference is early bird conference registration. Prospective customers must contact Mark43 through 'Book A Demo' or 'Let's Connect' for pricing consultation.
SourceFalco: Is Falco owned by Sysdig?
Sysdig created and open sourced it, but it graduated within the CNCF in February 2024, so governance sits with the foundation rather than the vendor.
Mark43: What payment methods or financing options does Mark43 offer?
No information about payment methods or financing options is disclosed on the public homepage. Pricing and payment details are handled through direct sales consultations.
SourceFalco: What does it cost?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The cost is the storage, routing, tuning and staff time needed to make its output useful.
Mark43: Are there volume discounts or specialized pricing for different agency sizes?
Mark43 website does not disclose any volume pricing, per-user costs, or specialized rates for agencies of different sizes. All pricing inquiries require direct contact with sales team.
SourceFalco: What kernel version do I need?
Kernel 5.8 or later for the default modern eBPF driver. Older hosts need the legacy eBPF probe or the kernel module.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Falco vs Snyk
- Falco vs Teleport
- Falco vs Darktrace
- Falco vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Falco vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Falco vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Falco vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Falco vs WireGuard
- Falco vs Bitwarden
- Falco vs Infisical
- Falco vs Semgrep
- Falco vs Trivy
- Falco vs One Identity
- Falco vs Ory Kratos
- Falco vs OWASP ZAP
- Falco vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Falco vs Passbolt
- Falco vs Ping Identity
- Falco vs Accela
- Falco vs CivicPlus
- Falco vs Granicus
- Falco vs DocuWare
- Falco vs CentralSquare
- Falco vs Tyler Brazos
- Falco vs Axon Records
- Falco vs Ring Neighbors
- Falco vs SafeCity
- Falco vs Vigilant Solutions
- Falco vs Citizen
- Falco vs IAPro
- Falco vs CitizenLab
- Falco vs ClearGov
- Falco vs DemandStar
- Falco vs eCode360
- Falco vs MyRec.com
- Mark43 vs Snyk
- Mark43 vs Teleport
- Mark43 vs Darktrace
- Mark43 vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Mark43 vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mark43 vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Mark43 vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Mark43 vs WireGuard
- Mark43 vs Bitwarden
- Mark43 vs Infisical
- Mark43 vs Semgrep
- Mark43 vs Trivy
- Mark43 vs One Identity
- Mark43 vs Ory Kratos
- Mark43 vs OWASP ZAP
- Mark43 vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Mark43 vs Passbolt
- Mark43 vs Ping Identity
- Mark43 vs Accela
- Mark43 vs CivicPlus
- Mark43 vs Granicus
- Mark43 vs DocuWare
- Mark43 vs CentralSquare
- Mark43 vs Tyler Brazos
- Mark43 vs Axon Records
- Mark43 vs Ring Neighbors
- Mark43 vs SafeCity
- Mark43 vs Vigilant Solutions
- Mark43 vs Citizen
- Mark43 vs IAPro
- Mark43 vs CitizenLab
- Mark43 vs ClearGov
- Mark43 vs DemandStar
- Mark43 vs eCode360
- Mark43 vs MyRec.com

