Maps · head to head
Citymapper vs ArcGIS Survey123

ArcGIS Survey123
Maps
Form-centric field data collection that writes straight into an ArcGIS organisation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Citymapper has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Citymapper citymapper's own App Store listing states live transit and turn-by-turn features work only in a named list of specific cities (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and dozens of other listed cities), not globally, per the developer's own description.; ArcGIS Survey123 the app is free and the licensing is not: every person completing a secure survey needs a paid ArcGIS user type, so a hundred-person field programme costs tens of thousands a year before anyone counts credits.
- They diverge on capability: Citymapper covers Multi-modal routing, ArcGIS Survey123 covers XLSForm authoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Citymapper and ArcGIS Survey123 actually diverge.
| Attribute | Citymapper | ArcGIS Survey123 |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | Per user per year by ArcGIS user type |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Ios, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android, Windows |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Citymapper
- Multi-modal routing
- Real-time departures
- Live bus tracking
- Disruption alerts
- Walking directions
- Uber
- Lyft
- Lime
Only in ArcGIS Survey123
- XLSForm authoring
- Web designer
- Offline collection
- Direct ArcGIS write
- Repeats and nested records
- Media and signature capture
- Webhooks and integration
- Reports
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Citymapper
- Daily commutingnot ArcGIS Survey123
- City explorationnot ArcGIS Survey123
- Trip planningnot ArcGIS Survey123
- Mobility as a servicenot ArcGIS Survey123
ArcGIS Survey123
- A water utility recording hydrant inspections that must appear on the corporate asset map the moment they are submitted, not after a nightly importnot Citymapper
- A local authority running a public consultation where anyone can submit without a licence, while staff review responses in an ArcGIS dashboardnot Citymapper
- An environmental monitoring programme with complex conditional forms authored in XLSForm and completed offline in areas with no signalnot Citymapper
- A field crew already licensed for ArcGIS Field Maps that needs structured forms alongside map-based editing without adding another vendornot Citymapper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Citymapper
- Citymapper's own App Store listing states live transit and turn-by-turn features work only in a named list of specific cities (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and dozens of other listed cities), not globally, per the developer's own description.
ArcGIS Survey123
- The app is free and the licensing is not: every person completing a secure survey needs a paid ArcGIS user type, so a hundred-person field programme costs tens of thousands a year before anyone counts credits.
- Esri does not publish user type prices on its main pricing pages, so buyers reconstruct the cost from marketplace listings or a sales conversation, which makes budgeting an ArcGIS rollout unnecessarily opaque.
- Credits are consumed by geocoding, storage and some analysis, and a data collection programme that generates heavy attachment volumes can burn through the bundled allowance and trigger a mid-year top-up.
- It is useless without ArcGIS. There is no standalone deployment, so the decision to use Survey123 is really a decision to buy or keep an ArcGIS estate.
- Form authoring splits between a web designer that is easy but limited and XLSForm plus Survey123 Connect that is capable but requires learning a spreadsheet syntax, and teams routinely start in the wrong one and rebuild.
Pricing, plan by plan
Citymapper
Free- FreeFree
- Multi-modal routing
- Real-time departures
- Basic navigation
- Citymapper Premium$4.99/month
- Live location sharing
- Weather integration
- Widgets
ArcGIS Survey123
On request- Survey123 appFree
- No separate charge for the app itself
- Requires an ArcGIS Online or Enterprise organisation
- Public surveys can be completed without a licence
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish surveys
- Foundational user type, can administer the organisation
- Includes an annual credit allowance
- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Required for each person completing a secure survey
- Dependent user type, must be added to an organisation with a foundational licence
- Public marketplace listings have shown around $400 per year
Which should you pick?
Choose Citymapper if
- You need multi-modal routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Ios, Android, Web.
- You also want real-time departures.
Choose ArcGIS Survey123 if
- You need xlsform authoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want web designer.
Questions people ask
- Is Citymapper or ArcGIS Survey123 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Citymapper starts at Free and ArcGIS Survey123 at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Citymapper or ArcGIS Survey123?
- Citymapper has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Citymapper and On request for ArcGIS Survey123.
- Does Citymapper or ArcGIS Survey123 run on more platforms?
- Citymapper runs on Ios, Android, Web. ArcGIS Survey123 runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- Can I use Citymapper for free?
- Yes. Citymapper has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ArcGIS Survey123 starts at On request.
- What is Citymapper best used for?
- Citymapper is most often used for daily commuting, city exploration, trip planning, mobility as a service. Of those, daily commuting and city exploration are not what ArcGIS Survey123 is typically brought in for.
- What can Citymapper do that ArcGIS Survey123 cannot?
- Citymapper covers Multi-modal routing, Real-time departures, Live bus tracking, Disruption alerts. ArcGIS Survey123 covers XLSForm authoring, Web designer, Offline collection, Direct ArcGIS write.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Citymapper: Does Citymapper offer paid membership?
Yes, Citymapper offers a CLUB membership tier with exclusive features, including AI-powered route selection. However, specific pricing details for CLUB membership are not disclosed on their main website.
SourceArcGIS Survey123: Is Survey123 free?
The app is. Using it is not, unless your surveys are public. Authoring needs a Creator licence and each person completing a secure survey needs a Mobile Worker, Editor, Creator or GIS Professional user type.
Citymapper: Where can I find Citymapper CLUB pricing?
Citymapper CLUB pricing is not published on their website. You would need to check the mobile app (Apple App Store or Google Play Store) or contact Citymapper support directly for current pricing information.
SourceArcGIS Survey123: How much are the user types?
Esri does not list them on its main pricing pages. Public marketplace listings have shown roughly $700 a year for Creator and $400 for Mobile Worker; confirm with Esri or a distributor for your region.
ArcGIS Survey123: Can respondents fill in a survey without a licence?
Yes, if the survey is shared publicly. Secure surveys require a licensed user type.
ArcGIS Survey123: Does it work offline?
Yes, in the mobile app, with sync when connectivity returns.
ArcGIS Survey123: Is it the same as ArcGIS Field Maps?
No. Field Maps is map-centric editing; Survey123 is form-centric. Many organisations license both, which doubles nothing because user types cover the whole app suite.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Survey123
Other head to heads
- Citymapper vs Transit
- Citymapper vs Google Maps Platform
- Citymapper vs HERE Technologies
- Citymapper vs Apple Maps
- Citymapper vs Mapbox
- Citymapper vs Ride with GPS
- Citymapper vs Trailforks
- Citymapper vs AllTrails
- Citymapper vs onX Maps
- Citymapper vs Felt
- Citymapper vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Citymapper vs TomTom
- Citymapper vs Waze
- Citymapper vs What3words
- Citymapper vs Google Maps
- Citymapper vs HERE WeGo
- Citymapper vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Citymapper vs SW Maps
- Citymapper vs QGIS
- Citymapper vs CARTO
- Citymapper vs Global Mapper
- Citymapper vs GRASS GIS
- Citymapper vs Leica Infinity
- Citymapper vs Gaia GPS
- Citymapper vs GraphHopper
- Citymapper vs IndoorAtlas
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Transit
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs HERE Technologies
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Apple Maps
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Ride with GPS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs AllTrails
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Felt
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs TomTom
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Waze
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs What3words
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Google Maps
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs HERE WeGo
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs TomTom Developer Portal
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Leica Infinity
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs IndoorAtlas

