Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs Incode

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; Incode incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Incode covers General Ledger.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and Incode actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | Incode |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | $700/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web, Desktop |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | Unknown | 1966 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in Incode
- General Ledger
- Accounts Payable
- Payroll Management
- Utility Billing
- Budget Management
- Bank Integrations
- ADP
- Third-party Payroll
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Incode
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Incode
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Incode
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Incode
Incode
- Financial management and ERP for small and mid-sized local governmentsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administrationnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Court and public safety records for municipalitiesnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Incode
- Incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page
- No pricing is published; Tyler routes all enquiries through contact and demo requests with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- The product is sold only to public sector organisations
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Incode
$700/month- Municipal Suite$700/month
- Financial Management
- HR/Payroll
- Utility Billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose Incode if
- You need general ledger.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want accounts payable.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or Incode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Incode at $700/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or Incode?
- Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Incode at $700/month.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or Incode run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. Incode runs on Web, Desktop.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what Incode is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that Incode cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. Incode covers General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Payroll Management, Utility Billing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs CivicPlus
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Granicus
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Accela
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs DocuWare
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Workday Government
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Springbrook Software
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs SAP for Government
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Mapbox Government
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs OpenCities
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs CentralSquare
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Axon Records
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nextdoor for Government
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Palantir Gotham
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Periscope Holdings
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ring Neighbors
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Incode vs Cisco Duo
- Incode vs JumpCloud
- Incode vs Ping Identity
- Incode vs Frontegg
- Incode vs Authelia
- Incode vs Beyond Identity
- Incode vs Transmit Security
- Incode vs Akeyless
- Incode vs authentik
- Incode vs Logto
- Incode vs Speakeasy
- Incode vs Authy
- Incode vs ExpressVPN
- Incode vs Falco
- Incode vs Fenergo
- Incode vs Google Authenticator
- Incode vs Grype
- Incode vs Hanwha Vision
- Incode vs CivicPlus
- Incode vs Granicus
- Incode vs Accela
- Incode vs DocuWare
- Incode vs Workday Government
- Incode vs Springbrook Software
- Incode vs SAP for Government
- Incode vs Mapbox Government
- Incode vs OpenCities
- Incode vs CentralSquare
- Incode vs Axon Records
- Incode vs Nextdoor for Government
- Incode vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Incode vs Palantir Gotham
- Incode vs Periscope Holdings
- Incode vs Ring Neighbors
- Incode vs CivicPlus Asset Management

