Cybersecurity · head to head
Endor Labs vs WarpBuild

Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

WarpBuild
Developer Tools
2x faster, 50% cheaper GitHub Actions runners
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Endor Labs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates; WarpBuild per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- They diverge on capability: Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Endor Labs and WarpBuild actually diverge.
| Attribute | Endor Labs | WarpBuild |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts | Usage-based per minute, varies by runner configuration |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, IDE | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
Only in WarpBuild
- Optimized runner infrastructure
- Intelligent caching
- Incremental builds
- Multi-architecture support
- Unlimited concurrency
- Autoscaling
- BYOC support
- Docker builders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot WarpBuild
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot WarpBuild
- Managing open source supply chain risknot WarpBuild
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot WarpBuild
WarpBuild
- Accelerating CI builds for teams with high test volumesnot Endor Labs
- Running tests generated by AI coding assistants efficientlynot Endor Labs
- Reducing GitHub Actions costs by 50% or morenot Endor Labs
- Supporting teams that need ARM64 architecture runnersnot Endor Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
WarpBuild
- Per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- Large configuration runners (32 vCPU) expensive at $0.064/min
- macOS M4 Pro 12-core at $0.16/min is highest-cost option
- BYOC option requires cloud setup by customer
Pricing, plan by plan
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
WarpBuild
On request- Linux x86-64 (2vCPU, 8GB)$0.004/minute
- 2 vCPU
- 8 GB RAM
- Standard performance
- Linux x86-64 (4vCPU, 16GB)$0.008/minute
- 4 vCPU
- 16 GB RAM
- Increased performance
- Linux x86-64 (8vCPU, 32GB)$0.016/minute
- 8 vCPU
- 32 GB RAM
- High performance
- Linux x86-64 (16vCPU, 64GB)$0.032/minute
- 16 vCPU
- 64 GB RAM
- Enterprise performance
Which should you pick?
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Choose WarpBuild if
- You need optimized runner infrastructure.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- You also want intelligent caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Endor Labs or WarpBuild better?
- Neither clearly leads. Endor Labs starts at Free and WarpBuild at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Endor Labs or WarpBuild?
- Endor Labs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Endor Labs and On request for WarpBuild.
- Does Endor Labs or WarpBuild run on more platforms?
- Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE. WarpBuild runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- Can I use Endor Labs for free?
- Yes. Endor Labs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. WarpBuild starts at On request.
- What is Endor Labs best used for?
- Endor Labs is most often used for securing ai coding agent outputs before deployment, reducing sast false positives with reachability analysis, managing open source supply chain risk, enforcing security policies in ci/cd pipelines. Of those, securing ai coding agent outputs before deployment and reducing sast false positives with reachability analysis are not what WarpBuild is typically brought in for.
- What can Endor Labs do that WarpBuild cannot?
- Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis. WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Intelligent caching, Incremental builds, Multi-architecture support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Endor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
SourceWarpBuild: How much cheaper is WarpBuild compared to GitHub Actions?
WarpBuild offers approximately 50% cost savings compared to GitHub-hosted runners. For example, Linux x86-64 2vCPU/8GB costs $0.004/min with WarpBuild vs $0.008/min with GitHub Actions.
SourceEndor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
SourceWarpBuild: What is BYOC and how does it differ from managed runners?
BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) allows customers to run WarpBuild on their own cloud infrastructure at $0.002/min. Managed runners use WarpBuild's cloud infrastructure. BYOC provides lower costs but requires customer setup.
SourceEndor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceWarpBuild: Does WarpBuild support ARM64 runners?
Yes, WarpBuild offers ARM64 runners at lower costs than x86-64. Linux ARM64 starts at $0.003/min for 2vCPU/8GB configuration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Socket
- Endor Labs vs Chainguard
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Arnica
- Endor Labs vs Infisical
- Endor Labs vs Veracode
- Endor Labs vs Speakeasy
- Endor Labs vs Tenable
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Vault
- Endor Labs vs Transcend
- Endor Labs vs Windscribe
- Endor Labs vs Yoti
- Endor Labs vs authentik
- Endor Labs vs Avast One
- Endor Labs vs Cosign
- Endor Labs vs Blacksmith
- Endor Labs vs Depot
- Endor Labs vs Namespace
- Endor Labs vs Earthly
- Endor Labs vs Nx Cloud
- Endor Labs vs Garden
- Endor Labs vs ConfigCat
- Endor Labs vs Dagger
- Endor Labs vs Nix
- Endor Labs vs Rust
- Endor Labs vs Ansible
- Endor Labs vs Nixpacks
- Endor Labs vs SonarQube
- Endor Labs vs Sourcegraph
- Endor Labs vs Sweep
- Endor Labs vs Visual Studio
- Endor Labs vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Endor Labs vs GNU Emacs
- WarpBuild vs Snyk
- WarpBuild vs Socket
- WarpBuild vs Chainguard
- WarpBuild vs Akeyless
- WarpBuild vs Doppler
- WarpBuild vs Arnica
- WarpBuild vs Infisical
- WarpBuild vs Veracode
- WarpBuild vs Speakeasy
- WarpBuild vs Tenable
- WarpBuild vs HashiCorp Vault
- WarpBuild vs Transcend
- WarpBuild vs Windscribe
- WarpBuild vs Yoti
- WarpBuild vs authentik
- WarpBuild vs Avast One
- WarpBuild vs Cosign
- WarpBuild vs Blacksmith
- WarpBuild vs Depot
- WarpBuild vs Namespace
- WarpBuild vs Earthly
- WarpBuild vs Nx Cloud
- WarpBuild vs Garden
- WarpBuild vs ConfigCat
- WarpBuild vs Dagger
- WarpBuild vs Nix
- WarpBuild vs Rust
- WarpBuild vs Ansible
- WarpBuild vs Nixpacks
- WarpBuild vs SonarQube
- WarpBuild vs Sourcegraph
- WarpBuild vs Sweep
- WarpBuild vs Visual Studio
- WarpBuild vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- WarpBuild vs GNU Emacs
