Developer Tools · head to head
Dagger vs Endor Labs

Dagger
Developer Tools
Programmable CI/CD engine that runs your pipeline as containers on any runner
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dagger dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.; Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- They diverge on capability: Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dagger and Endor Labs actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dagger | Endor Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month per team for Dagger Cloud | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted | Web, CLI, IDE |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dagger
- Pipelines as code
- Local and CI parity
- Content-addressed caching
- Dagger Functions and modules
- CI-provider agnostic
- Dagger Cloud traces
- GitHub Checks integration
- Container-native execution
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dagger
- A platform team maintaining near-identical build YAML across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls insteadnot Endor Labs
- An engineering organisation migrating off a CI provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migrationnot Endor Labs
- A team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug CI-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locallynot Endor Labs
- A monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materiallynot Endor Labs
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot Dagger
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot Dagger
- Managing open source supply chain risknot Dagger
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot Dagger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dagger
- Dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.
- Writing pipelines in Go or TypeScript raises the barrier to entry: a release engineer who could edit a YAML step now needs to read code, and the people who can fix a broken build shrink to those comfortable with the SDK.
- The engine runs as a container on the runner and needs a persistent cache volume to deliver its main benefit, so ephemeral CI runners give you correctness without the speed, and provisioning durable cache storage is extra platform work.
- The Team plan caps at ten users and ten million events per month; an organisation of any size crosses that quickly and moves to Enterprise pricing that is not published, so cost at scale is unknowable up front.
- The module ecosystem is young and thinly maintained relative to the marketplace of a mature CI provider, so integrations that exist as a one-line Action often have to be written yourself as a Dagger function.
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
Pricing, plan by plan
Dagger
Free- IndividualFree
- One user
- One million events per month
- Workflow logs and function call traces
- Team$50/month
- Up to ten users
- Ten million events per month
- Module insights and module catalogue
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom user and event limits
- SSO
- Managed single-tenant deployment
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
Which should you pick?
Choose Dagger if
- You need pipelines as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want local and ci parity.
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Dagger or Endor Labs better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dagger starts at Free and Endor Labs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dagger or Endor Labs?
- Dagger starts at Free and Endor Labs at Free.
- Does Dagger or Endor Labs run on more platforms?
- Dagger runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE.
- Can I use Dagger for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dagger best used for?
- Dagger is most often used for a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead, an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration, a team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug ci-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locally, a monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materially. Of those, a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead and an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration are not what Endor Labs is typically brought in for.
- What can Dagger do that Endor Labs cannot?
- Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Local and CI parity, Content-addressed caching, Dagger Functions and modules. Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dagger: Does Dagger replace GitHub Actions?
No. Dagger runs inside GitHub Actions or any other CI. It replaces the YAML that describes your pipeline steps, not the trigger and runner layer.
Endor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
SourceDagger: Is the engine open source?
Yes, the Dagger engine and SDKs are open source and free. Dagger Cloud, the observability product, is what costs money.
Endor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
SourceDagger: What is an event in the pricing?
Dagger Cloud meters pipeline telemetry events. One million per month is free; the Team plan at 50 USD per month allows ten million.
Endor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceDagger: Can I run the same pipeline on my laptop?
Yes, that is the main reason teams adopt it. The dagger CLI executes the identical graph locally, so CI-only failures become reproducible.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dagger vs Earthly
- Dagger vs Buildkite
- Dagger vs Tilt
- Dagger vs Nixpacks
- Dagger vs Depot
- Dagger vs Blacksmith
- Dagger vs WarpBuild
- Dagger vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Dagger vs Nx Cloud
- Dagger vs Namespace
- Dagger vs Pants Build
- Dagger vs StackBlitz
- Dagger vs PartyKit
- Dagger vs PhpStorm
- Dagger vs Pieces for Developers
- Dagger vs RAD Studio
- Dagger vs Refact
- Dagger vs Restate
- Dagger vs Snyk
- Dagger vs Socket
- Dagger vs Chainguard
- Dagger vs Akeyless
- Dagger vs Doppler
- Dagger vs Arnica
- Dagger vs Infisical
- Dagger vs Veracode
- Dagger vs Speakeasy
- Dagger vs Tenable
- Dagger vs HashiCorp Vault
- Dagger vs Transcend
- Dagger vs Windscribe
- Dagger vs Yoti
- Dagger vs authentik
- Dagger vs Avast One
- Dagger vs Cosign
- Endor Labs vs Earthly
- Endor Labs vs Buildkite
- Endor Labs vs Tilt
- Endor Labs vs Nixpacks
- Endor Labs vs Depot
- Endor Labs vs Blacksmith
- Endor Labs vs WarpBuild
- Endor Labs vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Endor Labs vs Nx Cloud
- Endor Labs vs Namespace
- Endor Labs vs Pants Build
- Endor Labs vs StackBlitz
- Endor Labs vs PartyKit
- Endor Labs vs PhpStorm
- Endor Labs vs Pieces for Developers
- Endor Labs vs RAD Studio
- Endor Labs vs Refact
- Endor Labs vs Restate
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Socket
- Endor Labs vs Chainguard
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Arnica
- Endor Labs vs Infisical
- Endor Labs vs Veracode
- Endor Labs vs Speakeasy
- Endor Labs vs Tenable
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Vault
- Endor Labs vs Transcend
- Endor Labs vs Windscribe
- Endor Labs vs Yoti
- Endor Labs vs authentik
- Endor Labs vs Avast One
- Endor Labs vs Cosign
