Manufacturing · head to head
eMaint vs Fulcrum

eMaint
Manufacturing
Configurable CMMS from Fluke Reliability for asset-heavy operations
- From
- $69/user/month
- Rated
- -

Fulcrum
Manufacturing
Field operations management for installing, inspecting and maintaining physical work
- From
- $39/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: eMaint the interface is dated against MaintainX and Limble, and this is the most common objection from technicians during a trial; Fulcrum monthly pricing only available for first 12 months; after that, annual commitment required
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which eMaint and Fulcrum actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in eMaint
- Configurable without code
- Preventive and condition-based
- Fluke sensor integration
- Parts and purchasing
- Compliance reporting
- Multi-site
Only in Fulcrum
Nothing recorded that eMaint does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
eMaint
- Asset-heavy manufacturing with an established maintenance process to reproducenot Fulcrum
- Teams moving from calendar-based to condition-based maintenancenot Fulcrum
- Regulated environments needing audit-ready maintenance recordsnot Fulcrum
- Organisations already invested in Fluke test and monitoring equipmentnot Fulcrum
Fulcrum
- Capturing inspection photos and data completely offlinenot eMaint
- Collecting field data in areas without cell coveragenot eMaint
- Tagging asset locations with geospatial coordinatesnot eMaint
- Automating asset maintenance work order workflowsnot eMaint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
eMaint
- The interface is dated against MaintainX and Limble, and this is the most common objection from technicians during a trial
- Configurability means implementation is a project rather than a signup, and teams that under-resource it end up with a half-configured system
- The three-user minimum makes it poor value for very small teams
- Mobile is functional but clearly secondary to the web application
- Pricing above the Team tier is quote-based, so comparison against published competitors requires a sales conversation
Fulcrum
- Monthly pricing only available for first 12 months; after that, annual commitment required
- Additional storage costs $2.20 USD per month per 20 GB block
- Enterprise plan requires minimum of 5 users
Pricing, plan by plan
eMaint
$69/user/month- Team$69/user/month
- Three-user minimum
- Work orders
- Preventive maintenance
- Professional$undefined/user/month
- Parts and purchasing
- Custom forms
- Advanced reporting
- Enterprise$undefined/user/month
- Condition monitoring
- API and integrations
- SSO
Fulcrum
$39/month- Professional$43/month
- 100 GB storage
- 10 data shares
- Standard email and in-app support
- Elite$39/month
- 500 GB storage
- 50 data shares
- Priority email, in-app, and phone support
- Enterprise$null/mo
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users minimum 5
- Unlimited storage
Which should you pick?
Choose eMaint if
- You need configurable without code.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want preventive and condition-based.
Choose Fulcrum if
Nothing in the data separates Fulcrum from eMaint on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is eMaint or Fulcrum better?
- Neither clearly leads. eMaint starts at $69/user/month and Fulcrum at $39/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, eMaint or Fulcrum?
- eMaint starts at $69/user/month and Fulcrum at $39/month.
- Does eMaint or Fulcrum run on more platforms?
- eMaint runs on Web, iOS, Android. Fulcrum runs on Web.
- What is eMaint best used for?
- eMaint is most often used for asset-heavy manufacturing with an established maintenance process to reproduce, teams moving from calendar-based to condition-based maintenance, regulated environments needing audit-ready maintenance records, organisations already invested in fluke test and monitoring equipment. Of those, asset-heavy manufacturing with an established maintenance process to reproduce and teams moving from calendar-based to condition-based maintenance are not what Fulcrum is typically brought in for.
- What can eMaint do that Fulcrum cannot?
- eMaint covers Configurable without code, Preventive and condition-based, Fluke sensor integration, Parts and purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
eMaint: Who owns eMaint?
Fluke Reliability, part of Fortive. That is why condition monitoring data from Fluke instruments integrates directly.
Fulcrum: How much does Fulcrum cost per user?
Professional and Elite plans cost $43 per month for monthly billing or $55 per user per month when billed annually. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Fulcrum.
SourceeMaint: What does it actually cost?
The Team plan is 69 USD per user per month with a three-user minimum, so roughly 2,484 USD a year at the floor. Professional and Enterprise are quoted.
Fulcrum: What is Fulcrum's storage limit?
Professional includes 100 GB storage, Elite includes 500 GB storage, and Enterprise includes unlimited storage. Additional storage blocks of 20 GB cost $2.20 USD per month.
SourceeMaint: Is it better than MaintainX or Limble?
Different trade. eMaint is more configurable and better on condition-based maintenance; the others are markedly better on mobile experience and speed of setup. Asset complexity should decide it.
Fulcrum: Are there restrictions on monthly billing for Fulcrum?
Monthly pricing is only available during the first 12 months as a Fulcrum customer. After 12 months, the company learns your usage pattern and offers pricing with an annual commitment required.
SourceeMaint: How long does implementation take?
Weeks rather than days for anything beyond a basic work order setup. The configurability that makes it flexible is also what makes setup a project.
eMaint: Does it suit small teams?
Poorly. The three-user minimum and the configuration effort both assume an organisation large enough to have a maintenance function rather than a maintenance person.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- eMaint vs Maintenance Connection
- eMaint vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- eMaint vs Petasense
- eMaint vs SKF Enlight Centre
- eMaint vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- eMaint vs Hippo CMMS
- eMaint vs Erbessd Instruments
- eMaint vs Augury
- eMaint vs PROGNOST Systems
- eMaint vs Seeq
- eMaint vs TrakSYS
- eMaint vs Sensemore
- eMaint vs Prodsmart
- eMaint vs Propel
- eMaint vs ProShop ERP
- eMaint vs Protolabs
- eMaint vs PTC Windchill
- eMaint vs Tulip
- eMaint vs Authentise
- eMaint vs Fusion 360
- eMaint vs SolidWorks
- eMaint vs MachineMetrics
- eMaint vs Oqton
- eMaint vs Paperless Parts
- eMaint vs 3YOURMIND
- eMaint vs Markforged Eiger
- eMaint vs COPA-DATA zenon
- eMaint vs Duro PLM
- eMaint vs Dyndrite
- eMaint vs Fictiv
- eMaint vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Fulcrum vs Maintenance Connection
- Fulcrum vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Fulcrum vs Petasense
- Fulcrum vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Fulcrum vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Fulcrum vs Hippo CMMS
- Fulcrum vs Erbessd Instruments
- Fulcrum vs Augury
- Fulcrum vs PROGNOST Systems
- Fulcrum vs Seeq
- Fulcrum vs TrakSYS
- Fulcrum vs Sensemore
- Fulcrum vs Prodsmart
- Fulcrum vs Propel
- Fulcrum vs ProShop ERP
- Fulcrum vs Protolabs
- Fulcrum vs PTC Windchill
- Fulcrum vs Tulip
- Fulcrum vs Authentise
- Fulcrum vs Fusion 360
- Fulcrum vs SolidWorks
- Fulcrum vs MachineMetrics
- Fulcrum vs Oqton
- Fulcrum vs Paperless Parts
- Fulcrum vs 3YOURMIND
- Fulcrum vs Markforged Eiger
- Fulcrum vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Fulcrum vs Duro PLM
- Fulcrum vs Dyndrite
- Fulcrum vs Fictiv
- Fulcrum vs Autodesk Netfabb
