Manufacturing · head to head
Fulcrum vs Sensemore

Fulcrum
Manufacturing
Field operations management for installing, inspecting and maintaining physical work
- From
- $39/month
- Rated
- -

Sensemore
Manufacturing
Low-cost wireless vibration and temperature monitoring with cloud analytics from a Turkish sensor manufacturer
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fulcrum monthly pricing only available for first 12 months; after that, annual commitment required; Sensemore the company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fulcrum and Sensemore actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fulcrum
Nothing recorded that Sensemore does not also cover.
Only in Sensemore
- Wireless vibration sensors
- Handheld analyser
- Cloud platform
- Machine learning models
- Multi-sensor synchronisation
- Gateways
- Open API
- Alarm notifications
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fulcrum
- Capturing inspection photos and data completely offlinenot Sensemore
- Collecting field data in areas without cell coveragenot Sensemore
- Tagging asset locations with geospatial coordinatesnot Sensemore
- Automating asset maintenance work order workflowsnot Sensemore
Sensemore
- A cement plant that wants coverage across the whole motor fleet rather than only the critical shortlistnot Fulcrum
- A mid-market manufacturer where the Western vendors quotes exceed the maintenance budget entirelynot Fulcrum
- An integrator packaging condition monitoring into a broader plant automation projectnot Fulcrum
- A water utility instrumenting remote pumping stations where sending a technician to take readings is the main costnot Fulcrum
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fulcrum
- Monthly pricing only available for first 12 months; after that, annual commitment required
- Additional storage costs $2.20 USD per month per 20 GB block
- Enterprise plan requires minimum of 5 users
Sensemore
- The company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- Support and spares are largely delivered through distributors, so response quality varies by country and buyers outside Turkey and the immediate region should verify local coverage before ordering.
- Pricing is not published and routes through integrators, which means the software cost is often bundled into a project price you cannot decompose.
- Long-term vendor viability is an open question for a venture-stage hardware company, and a sensor network is a ten-year commitment; an exit or wind-down would strand the installed hardware.
- Documentation and the analytics user interface are thinner than established competitors, so teams without vibration expertise get less guidance in interpreting what the platform flags.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fulcrum
$39/month- Professional$43/month
- 100 GB storage
- 10 data shares
- Standard email and in-app support
- Elite$39/month
- 500 GB storage
- 50 data shares
- Priority email, in-app, and phone support
- Enterprise$null/mo
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users minimum 5
- Unlimited storage
Sensemore
On request- Sensemore platform$undefined/year
- Hardware purchased per monitoring point
- Cloud platform subscription quoted by sensor count
- Sold largely through distributors and system integrators
Which should you pick?
Choose Fulcrum if
Nothing in the data separates Fulcrum from Sensemore on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Sensemore if
- You need wireless vibration sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want handheld analyser.
Questions people ask
- Is Fulcrum or Sensemore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fulcrum starts at $39/month and Sensemore at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fulcrum or Sensemore?
- Fulcrum starts at $39/month and Sensemore at On request.
- Does Fulcrum or Sensemore run on more platforms?
- Fulcrum runs on Web. Sensemore runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Fulcrum best used for?
- Fulcrum is most often used for capturing inspection photos and data completely offline, collecting field data in areas without cell coverage, tagging asset locations with geospatial coordinates, automating asset maintenance work order workflows. Of those, capturing inspection photos and data completely offline and collecting field data in areas without cell coverage are not what Sensemore is typically brought in for.
- What can Fulcrum do that Sensemore cannot?
- Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors, Handheld analyser, Cloud platform, Machine learning models.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fulcrum: How much does Fulcrum cost per user?
Professional and Elite plans cost $43 per month for monthly billing or $55 per user per month when billed annually. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Fulcrum.
SourceSensemore: Where is Sensemore based?
Istanbul, Turkey. It designs and manufactures its own sensing hardware.
Fulcrum: What is Fulcrum's storage limit?
Professional includes 100 GB storage, Elite includes 500 GB storage, and Enterprise includes unlimited storage. Additional storage blocks of 20 GB cost $2.20 USD per month.
SourceSensemore: Is pricing published?
No. Hardware and platform are quoted, usually through a distributor or system integrator.
Fulcrum: Are there restrictions on monthly billing for Fulcrum?
Monthly pricing is only available during the first 12 months as a Fulcrum customer. After 12 months, the company learns your usage pattern and offers pricing with an annual commitment required.
SourceSensemore: How does it compare on cost?
It is positioned below the established Western condition monitoring vendors, which is the reason most buyers evaluate it.
Sensemore: Can I get the raw data out?
Yes, there is a REST API and MQTT support for pulling measurements into other systems.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fulcrum vs Tulip
- Fulcrum vs Authentise
- Fulcrum vs Fusion 360
- Fulcrum vs SolidWorks
- Fulcrum vs MachineMetrics
- Fulcrum vs Oqton
- Fulcrum vs Paperless Parts
- Fulcrum vs eMaint
- Fulcrum vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Fulcrum vs 3YOURMIND
- Fulcrum vs Markforged Eiger
- Fulcrum vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Fulcrum vs Duro PLM
- Fulcrum vs Dyndrite
- Fulcrum vs Erbessd Instruments
- Fulcrum vs Fictiv
- Fulcrum vs Prodsmart
- Fulcrum vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Fulcrum vs KCF Technologies
- Fulcrum vs Augury
- Fulcrum vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Fulcrum vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Fulcrum vs MOVUS
- Fulcrum vs Petasense
- Fulcrum vs Poseidon Systems
- Fulcrum vs Samotics
- Fulcrum vs PROGNOST Systems
- Fulcrum vs Propel
- Fulcrum vs ProShop ERP
- Fulcrum vs Protolabs
- Sensemore vs Tulip
- Sensemore vs Authentise
- Sensemore vs Fusion 360
- Sensemore vs SolidWorks
- Sensemore vs MachineMetrics
- Sensemore vs Oqton
- Sensemore vs Paperless Parts
- Sensemore vs eMaint
- Sensemore vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Sensemore vs 3YOURMIND
- Sensemore vs Markforged Eiger
- Sensemore vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Sensemore vs Duro PLM
- Sensemore vs Dyndrite
- Sensemore vs Erbessd Instruments
- Sensemore vs Fictiv
- Sensemore vs Prodsmart
- Sensemore vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Sensemore vs KCF Technologies
- Sensemore vs Augury
- Sensemore vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Sensemore vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Sensemore vs MOVUS
- Sensemore vs Petasense
- Sensemore vs Poseidon Systems
- Sensemore vs Samotics
- Sensemore vs PROGNOST Systems
- Sensemore vs Propel
- Sensemore vs ProShop ERP
- Sensemore vs Protolabs
