Government · head to head
eCode360 vs Teleport

Teleport
Cybersecurity
Certificate-based access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and apps, replacing shared credentials and VPNs
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: eCode360 eCode360's own vendor site now redirects to ICC Code Solutions, stating eCode360 is now part of ICC Innovation, indicating General Code has been absorbed into ICC rather than operating as an independent vendor; Teleport pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- They diverge on capability: eCode360 covers Online Code Publishing, Teleport covers Short-lived certificates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which eCode360 and Teleport actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in eCode360
- Online Code Publishing
- Zoning Map Integration
- Advanced Search
- Code Comparison
- Mobile Responsive
- ArcGIS
- Zoning Software
- Document Systems
Only in Teleport
- Short-lived certificates
- Protocol coverage
- Session recording and replay
- Access Requests
- Device Trust
- Identity provider integration
- Machine identity
- FIPS and FedRAMP builds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
eCode360
- Citizen Servicesnot Teleport
- Records Managementnot Teleport
- Public Safetynot Teleport
- Civic Engagementnot Teleport
Teleport
- Removing long-lived SSH keys and shared database passwords so that offboarding an engineer takes one action in the identity providernot eCode360
- Producing session recordings and per-user database audit trails as direct evidence for SOC 2 or FedRAMPnot eCode360
- Giving contractors or on-call engineers time-boxed, approved access to production instead of standing admin rightsnot eCode360
- Replacing a flat VPN with per-resource authorisation across servers, Kubernetes and internal web appsnot eCode360
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
eCode360
- eCode360's own vendor site now redirects to ICC Code Solutions, stating eCode360 is now part of ICC Innovation, indicating General Code has been absorbed into ICC rather than operating as an independent vendor
- ICC Code Solutions' own eCode360 page lists a Professional Subscription at $195 per year in USD for read access to the eCode library, separate from the municipal codification subscriptions sold to local governments
Teleport
- Pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- The proxy is a hard dependency on reaching production, so it needs its own high availability deployment and a tested break-glass path or an outage in Teleport becomes an outage in your ability to respond to outages.
- The open source Community Edition omits Access Requests, Device Trust and the FIPS builds, which are exactly the controls an auditor asks about, so the free tier rarely survives a compliance review.
- Self-hosting means running and upgrading a certificate authority and its backing store, and Teleport releases frequently enough that upgrade work becomes a standing operational commitment.
- Coverage across protocols is uneven in depth, so teams with legacy systems, unusual databases or bespoke network appliances find gaps that still require the old VPN to remain in place alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
eCode360
$175/month- eCode360$175/month
- Online Codes
- Zoning Integration
- Mobile Access
Teleport
On request- Teleport Community Edition$undefined/year
- Open source, self-hosted
- SSH, Kubernetes, database and app access
- Session recording
- Teleport Enterprise$undefined/year
- Cloud-hosted or self-hosted
- Access Requests and approval workflow
- Device Trust and hardware key enforcement
Which should you pick?
Choose eCode360 if
- You need online code publishing.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want zoning map integration.
Choose Teleport if
- You need short-lived certificates.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want protocol coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is eCode360 or Teleport better?
- Neither clearly leads. eCode360 starts at $175/month and Teleport at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, eCode360 or Teleport?
- eCode360 starts at $175/month and Teleport at On request.
- Does eCode360 or Teleport run on more platforms?
- eCode360 runs on Web, Ios, Android. Teleport runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- What is eCode360 best used for?
- eCode360 is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what Teleport is typically brought in for.
- What can eCode360 do that Teleport cannot?
- eCode360 covers Online Code Publishing, Zoning Map Integration, Advanced Search, Code Comparison. Teleport covers Short-lived certificates, Protocol coverage, Session recording and replay, Access Requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Teleport: Is the open source edition usable in production?
Yes, but it lacks Access Requests, Device Trust and FIPS builds, which most compliance programmes end up requiring.
Teleport: How is it priced?
Not publicly. The vendor prices on active users and protected resources and provides a quote after a sales conversation.
Teleport: What happens if Teleport goes down?
Nobody reaches the resources behind it, so you need a highly available deployment and a documented break-glass procedure.
Teleport: Does it replace our VPN?
For anything you put behind it, yes. Legacy systems and appliances it does not support will keep the VPN alive.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- eCode360 vs Municode
- eCode360 vs Accela
- eCode360 vs CivicPlus
- eCode360 vs Granicus
- eCode360 vs DocuWare
- eCode360 vs American Legal Publishing
- eCode360 vs GovPilot
- eCode360 vs OpenCities
- eCode360 vs Bidnet Direct
- eCode360 vs Polco
- eCode360 vs Socrata
- eCode360 vs CKAN
- eCode360 vs Clariti
- eCode360 vs DataSF
- eCode360 vs Google Cloud for Government
- eCode360 vs Legistar
- eCode360 vs GovQA
- eCode360 vs JumpCloud
- eCode360 vs HashiCorp Vault
- eCode360 vs HashiCorp Boundary
- eCode360 vs Beyond Identity
- eCode360 vs Falco
- eCode360 vs Delinea
- eCode360 vs Sysdig
- eCode360 vs BeyondTrust
- eCode360 vs One Identity
- eCode360 vs Zscaler Internet Access
- eCode360 vs Doppler
- eCode360 vs Infisical
- eCode360 vs Akeyless
- eCode360 vs DataGrail
- eCode360 vs Envysion
- eCode360 vs Feedzai
- Teleport vs Municode
- Teleport vs Accela
- Teleport vs CivicPlus
- Teleport vs Granicus
- Teleport vs DocuWare
- Teleport vs American Legal Publishing
- Teleport vs GovPilot
- Teleport vs OpenCities
- Teleport vs Bidnet Direct
- Teleport vs Polco
- Teleport vs Socrata
- Teleport vs CKAN
- Teleport vs Clariti
- Teleport vs DataSF
- Teleport vs Google Cloud for Government
- Teleport vs Legistar
- Teleport vs GovQA
- Teleport vs JumpCloud
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Vault
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Teleport vs Beyond Identity
- Teleport vs Falco
- Teleport vs Delinea
- Teleport vs Sysdig
- Teleport vs BeyondTrust
- Teleport vs One Identity
- Teleport vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Teleport vs Doppler
- Teleport vs Infisical
- Teleport vs Akeyless
- Teleport vs DataGrail
- Teleport vs Envysion
- Teleport vs Feedzai

