Technology · head to head
Eclipse vs GraphQL Apollo

Eclipse
Technology
The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse high memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed; GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse covers Java development environment, GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse and GraphQL Apollo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse | GraphQL Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile |
| Category | Technology | APIs |
| Founded | 2001 | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse
- Java development environment
- Extensible plugin architecture
- Integrated debugger
- Code refactoring
- Version control integration
- Build automation
- Multi-language support
- Rich client platform
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse
- Java application developmentnot GraphQL Apollo
- Enterprise software developmentnot GraphQL Apollo
- Web application developmentnot GraphQL Apollo
- Plugin developmentnot GraphQL Apollo
- Educational programmingnot GraphQL Apollo
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Eclipse
- Schema federationnot Eclipse
- API analytics and monitoringnot Eclipse
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Eclipse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse
- High memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed
- Slow startup times and performance degradation with large projects or many open editors
- Requires configuration of eclipse.ini file to optimize heap sizes for adequate performance
- User interface considered outdated compared to modern IDE alternatives
- User base fell from 39% of Java developers in 2024 to 28% in 2025, indicating market decline
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Eclipse review.
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse if
- You need java development environment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want extensible plugin architecture.
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse or GraphQL Apollo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse or GraphQL Apollo?
- Eclipse starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free.
- Does Eclipse or GraphQL Apollo run on more platforms?
- Eclipse runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- Can I use Eclipse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse best used for?
- Eclipse is most often used for java application development, enterprise software development, web application development, plugin development. Of those, java application development and enterprise software development are not what GraphQL Apollo is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse do that GraphQL Apollo cannot?
- Eclipse covers Java development environment, Extensible plugin architecture, Integrated debugger, Code refactoring. GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse: How much does Eclipse IDE cost?
Eclipse IDE is completely free and open-source, released under the Eclipse Public License 2.0.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- Eclipse vs GitHub
- Eclipse vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Eclipse vs Docker
- Eclipse vs Plane
- Eclipse vs Postgres
- Eclipse vs Storybook
- Eclipse vs Okta
- Eclipse vs Kubernetes
- Eclipse vs PostHog
- Eclipse vs Jira
- Eclipse vs LogRocket
- Eclipse vs Neovim
- Eclipse vs UptimeRobot
- Eclipse vs Vercel
- Eclipse vs Zeta
- Eclipse vs Attio
- Eclipse vs PyCharm
- Eclipse vs WebStorm
- Eclipse vs Hasura
- Eclipse vs Appwrite
- Eclipse vs PocketBase
- Eclipse vs Sanity
- Eclipse vs Strapi
- Eclipse vs GraphQL Playground
- Eclipse vs Kong Gateway
- Eclipse vs Parse Server
- Eclipse vs WSO2 API Manager
- Eclipse vs Janus Gateway
- Eclipse vs Directus
- Eclipse vs KeystoneJS
- Eclipse vs Solaris
- Eclipse vs Stainless
- Eclipse vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Eclipse vs Thredd
- Eclipse vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs GitHub
- GraphQL Apollo vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- GraphQL Apollo vs Docker
- GraphQL Apollo vs Plane
- GraphQL Apollo vs Postgres
- GraphQL Apollo vs Storybook
- GraphQL Apollo vs Okta
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kubernetes
- GraphQL Apollo vs PostHog
- GraphQL Apollo vs Jira
- GraphQL Apollo vs LogRocket
- GraphQL Apollo vs Neovim
- GraphQL Apollo vs UptimeRobot
- GraphQL Apollo vs Vercel
- GraphQL Apollo vs Zeta
- GraphQL Apollo vs Attio
- GraphQL Apollo vs PyCharm
- GraphQL Apollo vs WebStorm
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client

