Developer Tools · head to head
Earthly vs Omada Identity

Omada Identity
Cybersecurity
Identity governance and administration focused on access certification and compliance evidence
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Earthly has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Earthly pricing model not published; requires sales contact; Omada Identity pricing is per managed identity, so organisations with large numbers of contractors, service accounts or seasonal staff pay governance fees on identities nobody is really governing.
- They diverge on capability: Earthly covers Policy as code, Omada Identity covers Access certification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Earthly and Omada Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Earthly | Omada Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | No pricing published on website | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Earthly
- Policy as code
- Multi-stage enforcement
- AI agent governance
- Repository-wide policies
- Incident response automation
- Compliance management
- Earthfiles build tool
- Satellites
Only in Omada Identity
- Access certification
- Joiner mover leaver
- Role modelling
- Segregation of duties
- Access request
- Connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Earthly
- Enforcing engineering standards across AI and human developersnot Omada Identity
- Automating incident response procedures across all repositoriesnot Omada Identity
- Embedding compliance requirements into development workflowsnot Omada Identity
- Standardizing build processes with Earthfilesnot Omada Identity
Omada Identity
- An organisation whose auditors flagged that access recertification is run on spreadsheets and cannot be evidencednot Earthly
- A company with high staff turnover where leavers keep access to systems weeks after their last daynot Earthly
- A regulated firm needing documented segregation of duties across finance and ERP entitlementsnot Earthly
- A business that abandoned a previous multi-year IGA implementation and needs something that reaches production this yearnot Earthly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Earthly
- Pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- Earthly Lunar is a recent launch (2025) with limited track record
- Primarily GitHub-focused; limited integration with other platforms
- No public documentation on pricing or feature tiers
Omada Identity
- Pricing is per managed identity, so organisations with large numbers of contractors, service accounts or seasonal staff pay governance fees on identities nobody is really governing.
- It governs access but provides no single sign-on, multi-factor authentication or privileged session management, so it is always a second or third identity subscription rather than a consolidation.
- The fast-deployment promise depends on accepting its standard process model; organisations with genuinely unusual entitlement structures end up in custom work and the timeline advantage disappears.
- Connector coverage is strong for mainstream enterprise systems and thin for bespoke or industry-specific applications, and each custom connector is a project with ongoing maintenance.
- Data quality in the HR system determines whether joiner mover leaver automation works, so companies with messy HR records find the tool exposes that problem rather than solving it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Earthly
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Earthly review.
Omada Identity
On request- Omada Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per managed identity per year
- SaaS on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options
- Implementation delivered on a defined methodology, quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Earthly if
- You need policy as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want multi-stage enforcement.
Choose Omada Identity if
- You need access certification.
- You also want joiner mover leaver.
Questions people ask
- Is Earthly or Omada Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Earthly starts at Free and Omada Identity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Earthly or Omada Identity?
- Earthly has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Earthly and On request for Omada Identity.
- Does Earthly or Omada Identity run on more platforms?
- Earthly runs on Web, CLI. Omada Identity runs on Web.
- Can I use Earthly for free?
- Yes. Earthly has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Omada Identity starts at On request.
- What is Earthly best used for?
- Earthly is most often used for enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers, automating incident response procedures across all repositories, embedding compliance requirements into development workflows, standardizing build processes with earthfiles. Of those, enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers and automating incident response procedures across all repositories are not what Omada Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Earthly do that Omada Identity cannot?
- Earthly covers Policy as code, Multi-stage enforcement, AI agent governance, Repository-wide policies. Omada Identity covers Access certification, Joiner mover leaver, Role modelling, Segregation of duties.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Earthly: What is the difference between Earthfiles and Earthly Lunar?
Earthfiles is an open-source build tool that reached 12,000 GitHub stars and is used by companies like NVIDIA, Intel, and Databricks. Earthly Lunar is a separate governance platform launched in 2025 for enforcing standards across development workflows.
SourceOmada Identity: Does it provide single sign-on?
No. Omada is governance only. You still need Entra ID, Okta or equivalent for authentication.
Earthly: How does Earthly Lunar enforce standards?
Lunar converts engineering standards, compliance requirements, and processes documented in AGENTS.md files, wikis, and incident postmortems into enforceable guardrails that apply consistently across repositories and development stages.
SourceOmada Identity: How is it licensed?
Per managed identity per year. Count contractors and service accounts before you compare quotes, because they usually count.
Earthly: What is the pricing for Earthly Lunar?
Pricing is not published on the website. Interested customers should contact Earthly's sales team for current pricing and feature tiers.
SourceOmada Identity: How long does deployment take?
Months rather than years is the positioning, and it is achievable if you accept the standard process model. Heavy customisation returns you to traditional IGA timelines.
Related pages
More on Omada Identity
Other head to heads
- Earthly vs Spacelift
- Earthly vs Dagger
- Earthly vs Nixpacks
- Earthly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Earthly vs OpsLevel
- Earthly vs Namespace
- Earthly vs Depot
- Earthly vs Blacksmith
- Earthly vs WarpBuild
- Earthly vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Earthly vs Garden
- Earthly vs Nx Cloud
- Earthly vs Cody
- Earthly vs ConfigCat
- Earthly vs Cortex
- Earthly vs Deep Code
- Earthly vs Deno
- Earthly vs Netwrix
- Earthly vs Saviynt
- Earthly vs One Identity
- Earthly vs Doppler
- Earthly vs Speakeasy
- Earthly vs Nessus
- Earthly vs Chainguard
- Earthly vs Fenergo
- Earthly vs Arnica
- Earthly vs KnowBe4
- Earthly vs Mimecast
- Earthly vs ThetaRay
- Earthly vs Trivy
- Earthly vs Trulioo
- Earthly vs Unit21
- Earthly vs Veracode
- Earthly vs Very Good Security
- Earthly vs Tenable
- Omada Identity vs Spacelift
- Omada Identity vs Dagger
- Omada Identity vs Nixpacks
- Omada Identity vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Omada Identity vs OpsLevel
- Omada Identity vs Namespace
- Omada Identity vs Depot
- Omada Identity vs Blacksmith
- Omada Identity vs WarpBuild
- Omada Identity vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Omada Identity vs Garden
- Omada Identity vs Nx Cloud
- Omada Identity vs Cody
- Omada Identity vs ConfigCat
- Omada Identity vs Cortex
- Omada Identity vs Deep Code
- Omada Identity vs Deno
- Omada Identity vs Netwrix
- Omada Identity vs Saviynt
- Omada Identity vs One Identity
- Omada Identity vs Doppler
- Omada Identity vs Speakeasy
- Omada Identity vs Nessus
- Omada Identity vs Chainguard
- Omada Identity vs Fenergo
- Omada Identity vs Arnica
- Omada Identity vs KnowBe4
- Omada Identity vs Mimecast
- Omada Identity vs ThetaRay
- Omada Identity vs Trivy
- Omada Identity vs Trulioo
- Omada Identity vs Unit21
- Omada Identity vs Veracode
- Omada Identity vs Very Good Security
- Omada Identity vs Tenable

