Software · head to head
Dynatrace Logs vs Grafana Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dynatrace Logs log ingest and processing is billed at $0.20 per GiB, separately from retention and from query; Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- They diverge on capability: Dynatrace Logs covers Log analysis, Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dynatrace Logs and Grafana Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dynatrace Logs | Grafana Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) |
| Founded | 2005 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dynatrace Logs
- Log analysis
- AI-powered insights
- Metrics integration
- Automated root cause
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dynatrace Logs
- Ingesting and processing application and infrastructure logsnot Grafana Loki
- Querying logs alongside traces and metrics in one platformnot Grafana Loki
- Log driven alerting within an existing Dynatrace deploymentnot Grafana Loki
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Dynatrace Logs
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Dynatrace Logs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dynatrace Logs
- Log ingest and processing is billed at $0.20 per GiB, separately from retention and from query
- Querying logs is charged in addition to ingest, either pay per query or as bundled queries
- Log analytics requires the same annual platform commitment as the rest of the Dynatrace platform
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Pricing, plan by plan
Dynatrace Logs
Free- FreeFree
- Log analysis
- AI-powered insights
- Metrics integration
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Dynatrace Logs if
- You need log analysis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want ai-powered insights.
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Dynatrace Logs or Grafana Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dynatrace Logs starts at Free and Grafana Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dynatrace Logs or Grafana Loki?
- Dynatrace Logs starts at Free and Grafana Loki at Free.
- Does Dynatrace Logs or Grafana Loki run on more platforms?
- Dynatrace Logs runs on Web, Api. Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- Can I use Dynatrace Logs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dynatrace Logs best used for?
- Dynatrace Logs is most often used for ingesting and processing application and infrastructure logs, querying logs alongside traces and metrics in one platform, log driven alerting within an existing dynatrace deployment. Of those, ingesting and processing application and infrastructure logs and querying logs alongside traces and metrics in one platform are not what Grafana Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Dynatrace Logs do that Grafana Loki cannot?
- Dynatrace Logs covers Log analysis, AI-powered insights, Metrics integration, Automated root cause. Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Dynatrace Logs
More on Grafana Loki
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Dynatrace Logs vs Elastic Stack
- Dynatrace Logs vs New Relic
- Dynatrace Logs vs Datadog Logs
- Dynatrace Logs vs Coralogix
- Dynatrace Logs vs CloudWatch
- Dynatrace Logs vs Dynatrace
- Dynatrace Logs vs InfluxDB
- Dynatrace Logs vs Airbrake
- Dynatrace Logs vs AppDynamics
- Dynatrace Logs vs Axiom
- Dynatrace Logs vs Azure Monitor
- Dynatrace Logs vs Better Stack
- Dynatrace Logs vs Bugsnag
- Dynatrace Logs vs Elastic
- Dynatrace Logs vs Elastic APM
- Dynatrace Logs vs Elasticsearch Service
- Dynatrace Logs vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Airbrake
- Grafana Loki vs AppDynamics
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Bugsnag
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack


