Manufacturing · head to head
Duro PLM vs TrendMiner

Duro PLM
Manufacturing
Hosted PLM for hardware startups, sold in fixed user bands with no published price
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

TrendMiner
Manufacturing
Search-driven time series analytics for process engineers, now owned by Proemion rather than Software AG
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Duro PLM no pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.; TrendMiner ownership moved from Software AG to Proemion in a 47 million euro sale during the Silver Lake break-up, so the integration roadmap tied to webMethods and Cumulocity is gone and the new owner is far smaller.
- They diverge on capability: Duro PLM covers Part library, TrendMiner covers Pattern search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duro PLM and TrendMiner actually diverge.
| Attribute | Duro PLM | TrendMiner |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duro PLM
- Part library
- Multi-level BOMs
- Change orders
- CAD integrations
- Supplier and cost data
- User band plans
Only in TrendMiner
- Pattern search
- Value-based search
- Monitors
- Soft sensors
- Context items
- Dashboards
- Machine learning models
- ContextHub
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duro PLM
- A robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturernot TrendMiner
- A consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the BOMnot TrendMiner
- A hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's BOM spreadsheet versionsnot TrendMiner
- A venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production buildnot TrendMiner
TrendMiner
- Finding every prior occurrence of a heat exchanger fouling signature to estimate cleaning frequency from history rather than from a rule of thumbnot Duro PLM
- Comparing golden batches against off-spec ones in a pharmaceutical process without exporting to a data science teamnot Duro PLM
- Building a monitor that flags the early temperature signature that preceded the last three compressor tripsnot Duro PLM
- Giving a process engineer a way to answer a question in an afternoon that previously required a historian export and a spreadsheet weeknot Duro PLM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duro PLM
- No pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.
- Plans are sold in fixed user bands rather than per seat, so hiring an eleventh engineer moves you to the next tier instead of adding one seat.
- Storage allowances are capped at 25, 50 and 100 GB, which is tight for teams keeping native CAD files rather than only neutral formats.
- There is no self-hosted or on-premises option, which rules Duro out for defence and some aerospace suppliers with data residency or ITAR handling constraints.
- Scope stops at engineering data: no requirements management, no quality module and no manufacturing process planning, so it does not replace the systems a company needs at production scale.
TrendMiner
- Ownership moved from Software AG to Proemion in a 47 million euro sale during the Silver Lake break-up, so the integration roadmap tied to webMethods and Cumulocity is gone and the new owner is far smaller.
- It is built for continuous time series and handles discrete manufacturing, relational quality data and event-driven production poorly, so plants that are not continuous process get limited value.
- Value depends entirely on historian data quality and tag naming; sites with inconsistent tag descriptions and missing asset context spend months on data preparation before the search features are usable.
- Licensing is by named analyst user, and the population who genuinely use pattern search is small, so organisations that buy broadly pay for seats that log in occasionally.
- It reads history but does not fix it: there is no data collection layer, so an existing historian is mandatory and TrendMiner is always an additional cost on top of it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Duro PLM
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Up to 10 users
- 25 GB data storage
- Part library, BOMs and change orders
- Business$undefined/year
- Up to 20 users
- 50 GB data storage
- CAD integrations
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 20 or more users
- 100 GB data storage
- Extended support
TrendMiner
On request- TrendMiner$undefined/year
- Annual subscription sized by named users and connected historian tag volume
- Separate licence tiers for full analyst users and view-only dashboard consumers
- Historian connectors quoted per source system
Which should you pick?
Choose TrendMiner if
- You need pattern search.
- You work on Web, Windows, Linux.
- You also want value-based search.
Questions people ask
- Is Duro PLM or TrendMiner better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duro PLM starts at On request and TrendMiner at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duro PLM or TrendMiner?
- Duro PLM starts at On request and TrendMiner at On request.
- Does Duro PLM or TrendMiner run on more platforms?
- Duro PLM runs on Web. TrendMiner runs on Web, Windows, Linux.
- What is Duro PLM best used for?
- Duro PLM is most often used for a robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturer, a consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the bom, a hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's bom spreadsheet versions, a venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production build. Of those, a robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturer and a consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the bom are not what TrendMiner is typically brought in for.
- What can Duro PLM do that TrendMiner cannot?
- Duro PLM covers Part library, Multi-level BOMs, Change orders, CAD integrations. TrendMiner covers Pattern search, Value-based search, Monitors, Soft sensors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duro PLM: How much does Duro cost?
Duro does not publish prices. Plans are fixed annual subscriptions quoted by sales against a user band, billed Net 30.
TrendMiner: Who owns TrendMiner now?
Proemion, a German industrial analytics company backed by Battery Ventures, which bought it from Software AG for 47 million euros in 2024.
Duro PLM: Can I run Duro on my own servers?
No. It is cloud only, which is a hard blocker for organisations with data residency or export control requirements.
TrendMiner: Does it replace my historian?
No. It connects to PI, IP.21, PHD, Exaquantum and others and reads from them. The historian remains the system of record.
Duro PLM: What happens when we exceed our user band?
You move to the next tier rather than adding individual seats, so growth arrives as a step change in cost.
TrendMiner: Do I need a data scientist to use it?
No, and that is the point. The pattern search and soft sensor tooling are aimed at process engineers with no coding background.
Duro PLM: Is Duro suitable for medical device work?
Its change control is real but the workflow configuration and audit depth are lighter than dedicated regulated-industry PLM, so most ISO 13485 programmes need more.
TrendMiner: Is pricing per user?
Yes, largely, with tiers for analyst and view-only access plus charges for historian connectors and data volume.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Duro PLM vs Fusion 360
- Duro PLM vs PTC Windchill
- Duro PLM vs Aras Innovator
- Duro PLM vs OpenBOM
- Duro PLM vs Propel
- Duro PLM vs Augury
- Duro PLM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Duro PLM vs KCF Technologies
- Duro PLM vs MOVUS
- Duro PLM vs Sight Machine
- Duro PLM vs TrakSYS
- Duro PLM vs AMFG
- Duro PLM vs Authentise
- Duro PLM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Duro PLM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Duro PLM vs Arena PLM
- Duro PLM vs Ignition
- Duro PLM vs Seeq
- Duro PLM vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Duro PLM vs Oden Technologies
- Duro PLM vs Petasense
- Duro PLM vs eMaint
- Duro PLM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Duro PLM vs Erbessd Instruments
- Duro PLM vs Flow Software
- Duro PLM vs ABB 800xA
- Duro PLM vs AVEVA System Platform
- Duro PLM vs Hippo CMMS
- Duro PLM vs 3YOURMIND
- TrendMiner vs Fusion 360
- TrendMiner vs PTC Windchill
- TrendMiner vs Aras Innovator
- TrendMiner vs OpenBOM
- TrendMiner vs Propel
- TrendMiner vs Augury
- TrendMiner vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- TrendMiner vs KCF Technologies
- TrendMiner vs MOVUS
- TrendMiner vs Sight Machine
- TrendMiner vs TrakSYS
- TrendMiner vs AMFG
- TrendMiner vs Authentise
- TrendMiner vs COPA-DATA zenon
- TrendMiner vs Autodesk Netfabb
- TrendMiner vs Arena PLM
- TrendMiner vs Ignition
- TrendMiner vs Seeq
- TrendMiner vs SKF Enlight Centre
- TrendMiner vs Oden Technologies
- TrendMiner vs Petasense
- TrendMiner vs eMaint
- TrendMiner vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- TrendMiner vs Erbessd Instruments
- TrendMiner vs Flow Software
- TrendMiner vs ABB 800xA
- TrendMiner vs AVEVA System Platform
- TrendMiner vs Hippo CMMS
- TrendMiner vs 3YOURMIND
