Manufacturing · head to head
Hippo CMMS vs TrendMiner

Hippo CMMS
Manufacturing
Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

TrendMiner
Manufacturing
Search-driven time series analytics for process engineers, now owned by Proemion rather than Software AG
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price; TrendMiner ownership moved from Software AG to Proemion in a 47 million euro sale during the Silver Lake break-up, so the integration roadmap tied to webMethods and Cumulocity is gone and the new owner is far smaller.
- They diverge on capability: Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, TrendMiner covers Pattern search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hippo CMMS and TrendMiner actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hippo CMMS | TrendMiner |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hippo CMMS
- Interactive site maps
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Equipment records
- Vendor management
- Mobile access
Only in TrendMiner
- Pattern search
- Value-based search
- Monitors
- Soft sensors
- Context items
- Dashboards
- Machine learning models
- ContextHub
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hippo CMMS
- Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot TrendMiner
- Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot TrendMiner
- Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot TrendMiner
- Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot TrendMiner
TrendMiner
- Finding every prior occurrence of a heat exchanger fouling signature to estimate cleaning frequency from history rather than from a rule of thumbnot Hippo CMMS
- Comparing golden batches against off-spec ones in a pharmaceutical process without exporting to a data science teamnot Hippo CMMS
- Building a monitor that flags the early temperature signature that preceded the last three compressor tripsnot Hippo CMMS
- Giving a process engineer a way to answer a question in an afternoon that previously required a historian export and a spreadsheet weeknot Hippo CMMS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hippo CMMS
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
- The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
- Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
- Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs
TrendMiner
- Ownership moved from Software AG to Proemion in a 47 million euro sale during the Silver Lake break-up, so the integration roadmap tied to webMethods and Cumulocity is gone and the new owner is far smaller.
- It is built for continuous time series and handles discrete manufacturing, relational quality data and event-driven production poorly, so plants that are not continuous process get limited value.
- Value depends entirely on historian data quality and tag naming; sites with inconsistent tag descriptions and missing asset context spend months on data preparation before the search features are usable.
- Licensing is by named analyst user, and the population who genuinely use pattern search is small, so organisations that buy broadly pay for seats that log in occasionally.
- It reads history but does not fix it: there is no data collection layer, so an existing historian is mandatory and TrendMiner is always an additional cost on top of it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hippo CMMS
On request- Eptura Asset$undefined/month
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Asset records
TrendMiner
On request- TrendMiner$undefined/year
- Annual subscription sized by named users and connected historian tag volume
- Separate licence tiers for full analyst users and view-only dashboard consumers
- Historian connectors quoted per source system
Which should you pick?
Choose Hippo CMMS if
- You need interactive site maps.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work order management.
Choose TrendMiner if
- You need pattern search.
- You work on Web, Windows, Linux.
- You also want value-based search.
Questions people ask
- Is Hippo CMMS or TrendMiner better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hippo CMMS starts at On request and TrendMiner at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hippo CMMS or TrendMiner?
- Hippo CMMS starts at On request and TrendMiner at On request.
- Does Hippo CMMS or TrendMiner run on more platforms?
- Hippo CMMS runs on Web, iOS, Android. TrendMiner runs on Web, Windows, Linux.
- What is Hippo CMMS best used for?
- Hippo CMMS is most often used for facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate, sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it, existing hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within eptura, organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suite. Of those, facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate and sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it are not what TrendMiner is typically brought in for.
- What can Hippo CMMS do that TrendMiner cannot?
- Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Work order management, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records. TrendMiner covers Pattern search, Value-based search, Monitors, Soft sensors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?
Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.
TrendMiner: Who owns TrendMiner now?
Proemion, a German industrial analytics company backed by Battery Ventures, which bought it from Software AG for 47 million euros in 2024.
Hippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?
Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.
TrendMiner: Does it replace my historian?
No. It connects to PI, IP.21, PHD, Exaquantum and others and reads from them. The historian remains the system of record.
Hippo CMMS: What does it cost?
Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.
TrendMiner: Do I need a data scientist to use it?
No, and that is the point. The pattern search and soft sensor tooling are aimed at process engineers with no coding background.
Hippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?
Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.
TrendMiner: Is pricing per user?
Yes, largely, with tiers for analyst and view-only access plus charges for historian connectors and data volume.
Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?
They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hippo CMMS vs Maintenance Connection
- Hippo CMMS vs eMaint
- Hippo CMMS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Hippo CMMS vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Hippo CMMS vs OpenBOM
- Hippo CMMS vs Propel
- Hippo CMMS vs ProShop ERP
- Hippo CMMS vs Fusion 360
- Hippo CMMS vs SolidWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs MachineMetrics
- Hippo CMMS vs LabVIEW
- Hippo CMMS vs AVEVA System Platform
- Hippo CMMS vs 3YOURMIND
- Hippo CMMS vs AMFG
- Hippo CMMS vs Aras Innovator
- Hippo CMMS vs Arena PLM
- Hippo CMMS vs Authentise
- Hippo CMMS vs Sight Machine
- Hippo CMMS vs Ignition
- Hippo CMMS vs Seeq
- Hippo CMMS vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Hippo CMMS vs Oden Technologies
- Hippo CMMS vs Petasense
- Hippo CMMS vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Hippo CMMS vs Erbessd Instruments
- Hippo CMMS vs Flow Software
- Hippo CMMS vs Augury
- Hippo CMMS vs ABB 800xA
- TrendMiner vs Maintenance Connection
- TrendMiner vs eMaint
- TrendMiner vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- TrendMiner vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- TrendMiner vs OpenBOM
- TrendMiner vs Propel
- TrendMiner vs ProShop ERP
- TrendMiner vs Fusion 360
- TrendMiner vs SolidWorks
- TrendMiner vs MachineMetrics
- TrendMiner vs LabVIEW
- TrendMiner vs AVEVA System Platform
- TrendMiner vs 3YOURMIND
- TrendMiner vs AMFG
- TrendMiner vs Aras Innovator
- TrendMiner vs Arena PLM
- TrendMiner vs Authentise
- TrendMiner vs Sight Machine
- TrendMiner vs Ignition
- TrendMiner vs Seeq
- TrendMiner vs SKF Enlight Centre
- TrendMiner vs Oden Technologies
- TrendMiner vs Petasense
- TrendMiner vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- TrendMiner vs Erbessd Instruments
- TrendMiner vs Flow Software
- TrendMiner vs Augury
- TrendMiner vs ABB 800xA
