Cybersecurity · head to head
DTiQ vs Transmit Security

DTiQ
Cybersecurity
Managed video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DTiQ you are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- They diverge on capability: DTiQ covers SmartAudit, Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DTiQ and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | DTiQ | Transmit Security |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DTiQ
- SmartAudit
- POS transaction linking
- 360iQ platform
- Exception alerting
- Drive-through timing
- Food safety and compliance checks
- Managed installation
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DTiQ
- A multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen storesnot Transmit Security
- A convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counternot Transmit Security
- An operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdotenot Transmit Security
- A brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field managernot Transmit Security
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot DTiQ
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot DTiQ
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot DTiQ
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot DTiQ
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DTiQ
- You are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.
- Audits are sampled, not continuous, so a problem outside the reviewed window is invisible and the score is a statistical impression rather than a complete record.
- Nothing is published on price and the commercial shape is a multi-year managed service agreement, which is harder to exit than a software subscription and typically involves bundled hardware you do not own.
- Ownership changed in a $200 million Digital Alpha led investment tied to a Cisco Meraki partnership, so the hardware and network roadmap may shift under an existing estate.
- It is built around restaurant, convenience and retail operating models, so an organisation outside those verticals gets a generic video product and pays for an audit methodology that does not fit its work.
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
DTiQ
On request- DTiQ managed service$undefined/month
- Priced per location as a managed service, not per camera
- Audit frequency and scope determine the rate
- Hardware and installation bundled into the service agreement
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose DTiQ if
- You need smartaudit.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pos transaction linking.
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is DTiQ or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. DTiQ starts at On request and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DTiQ or Transmit Security?
- DTiQ starts at On request and Transmit Security at On request.
- Does DTiQ or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is DTiQ best used for?
- DTiQ is most often used for a multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen stores, a convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counter, an operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdote, a brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field manager. Of those, a multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen stores and a convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counter are not what Transmit Security is typically brought in for.
- What can DTiQ do that Transmit Security cannot?
- DTiQ covers SmartAudit, POS transaction linking, 360iQ platform, Exception alerting. Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DTiQ: Is DTiQ a video management system?
Not primarily. It is a managed service where human auditors review your footage and deliver scored reports. The platform exists to support that service.
Transmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
DTiQ: How is it priced?
Per location as a managed service, based on audit scope and frequency, with hardware and installation bundled. Nothing is published.
Transmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
DTiQ: Who owns DTiQ?
Digital Alpha holds a majority stake following a $200 million investment that bought out Bain Capital, BV Investment Partners and others, alongside a Cisco Meraki partnership.
Transmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
DTiQ: Does it integrate with my POS?
Yes, with major restaurant and convenience store point of sale systems, which is what allows transaction exceptions to be replayed on video.
Related pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- DTiQ vs Rhombus Systems
- DTiQ vs Salient CompleteView
- DTiQ vs Spot AI
- DTiQ vs Envysion
- DTiQ vs March Networks
- DTiQ vs Eagle Eye Networks
- DTiQ vs Camio
- DTiQ vs BigID
- DTiQ vs NICE Actimize
- DTiQ vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- DTiQ vs Proofpoint
- DTiQ vs Genetec Security Center
- DTiQ vs Endor Labs
- DTiQ vs Enpass
- DTiQ vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- DTiQ vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- DTiQ vs Fortinet FortiGate
- DTiQ vs HID Global
- DTiQ vs Descope
- DTiQ vs Beyond Identity
- DTiQ vs Sardine
- DTiQ vs Feedzai
- DTiQ vs Socure
- DTiQ vs Unit21
- DTiQ vs Ping Identity
- DTiQ vs Stytch
- DTiQ vs Semgrep
- DTiQ vs Syft
- DTiQ vs ThetaRay
- DTiQ vs Trivy
- DTiQ vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Salient CompleteView
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Envysion
- Transmit Security vs March Networks
- Transmit Security vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Transmit Security vs Camio
- Transmit Security vs BigID
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Transmit Security vs Proofpoint
- Transmit Security vs Genetec Security Center
- Transmit Security vs Endor Labs
- Transmit Security vs Enpass
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Transmit Security vs HID Global
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo
