Research · head to head
Castor EDC vs Dovetail

Castor EDC
Research
Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Dovetail
Research
AI-powered customer intelligence and research repository.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dovetail has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Castor EDC nothing is published: pricing is quoted only after a scoping call and protocol review, so budgeting a grant application means asking for a quote months before the study is funded and hoping the scope holds.; Dovetail no published mid-market pricing; enterprises must contact sales for custom quotes
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Castor EDC and Dovetail actually diverge.
| Attribute | Castor EDC | Dovetail |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Mobile, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Castor EDC
- Browser-based study build
- 21 CFR Part 11 workflows
- eConsent
- ePRO and surveys
- Randomisation
- Per-study licensing
- Grant-funded pricing paths
- Data export
Only in Dovetail
Nothing recorded that Castor EDC does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Castor EDC
- An academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade EDC contract or a data management CROnot Dovetail
- A medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with Part 11 audit trailsnot Dovetail
- A multi-site registry that needs remote eConsent because participants are recruited nationally rather than at a clinicnot Dovetail
- A biotech running a small phase two study that wants the database built by its own clinical team in weeks rather than commissionednot Dovetail
Dovetail
- Product teams conducting qualitative research and extracting actionable insightsnot Castor EDC
- Customer success teams identifying churn drivers through session recordings and feedbacknot Castor EDC
- Design and UX teams analysing user feedback to inform product decisionsnot Castor EDC
- Marketing teams monitoring sentiment and customer perception trendsnot Castor EDC
- Enterprise organisations requiring secure, compliant customer intelligence infrastructurenot Castor EDC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Castor EDC
- Nothing is published: pricing is quoted only after a scoping call and protocol review, so budgeting a grant application means asking for a quote months before the study is funded and hoping the scope holds.
- Price scales on protocol complexity rather than a simple unit, so two studies with the same participant count can be quoted very differently and there is no public benchmark to argue against.
- Modules such as eConsent, ePRO and randomisation are quoted on top of the base platform, so the headline EDC figure is rarely the number that appears on the final proposal.
- It is deliberately lighter than the full sponsor suites, so a study that grows into a global registrational programme needing integrated CTMS, safety, IRT and full trial supply management will need additional systems and the interfaces between them.
- Regulatory responsibility does not transfer with the software: the platform supports Part 11 compliant workflows, but system validation for your intended use, SOPs and audit readiness remain your obligation and your cost, which sponsors new to EDC consistently underestimate.
Dovetail
- No published mid-market pricing; enterprises must contact sales for custom quotes
- Free tier strictly limited to one channel and one project; scaling requires Enterprise plan
- Enterprise pricing model opaque; no transparent tier for growing teams
- Free tier includes AI Chat but with basic summaries only; advanced AI features reserved for Enterprise
- No per-seat pricing published; cost model for multi-person teams unclear
Pricing, plan by plan
Castor EDC
On request- Castor EDC$undefined/year
- Priced per study on protocol complexity, duration, sites and modules
- 21 CFR Part 11 and ICH GCP workflows
- eConsent, ePRO and randomisation modules quoted separately
Dovetail
Free- FreeFree
- One channel for feedback tracking
- One project for research
- AI Chat with basic summaries
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Unlimited agents, channels, projects and docs
- Advanced dashboards and AI features
- Data redaction and access controls
Which should you pick?
Choose Castor EDC if
- You need browser-based study build.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want 21 cfr part 11 workflows.
Questions people ask
- Is Castor EDC or Dovetail better?
- Neither clearly leads. Castor EDC starts at On request and Dovetail at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Castor EDC or Dovetail?
- Dovetail has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Castor EDC and Free for Dovetail.
- Does Castor EDC or Dovetail run on more platforms?
- Castor EDC runs on Web, iOS, Android. Dovetail runs on Web, Mobile, API.
- Can I use Dovetail for free?
- Yes. Dovetail has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Castor EDC starts at On request.
- What is Castor EDC best used for?
- Castor EDC is most often used for an academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade edc contract or a data management cro, a medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with part 11 audit trails, a multi-site registry that needs remote econsent because participants are recruited nationally rather than at a clinic, a biotech running a small phase two study that wants the database built by its own clinical team in weeks rather than commissioned. Of those, an academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade edc contract or a data management cro and a medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with part 11 audit trails are not what Dovetail is typically brought in for.
- What can Castor EDC do that Dovetail cannot?
- Castor EDC covers Browser-based study build, 21 CFR Part 11 workflows, eConsent, ePRO and surveys.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Castor EDC: Is there a free academic version?
No published free tier. There are academic, non-profit and grant-funded pricing paths, but each is quoted rather than self-service.
Dovetail: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes one channel for feedback tracking, one project for organising research, and AI Chat with basic summaries.
SourceCastor EDC: Is it 21 CFR Part 11 compliant?
It supports Part 11 compliant workflows with audit trails and electronic signatures. Validating the system for your specific use remains your responsibility.
Dovetail: Does Dovetail have compliance certifications?
Yes. Dovetail is SOC 2 Type II compliant and includes automatic PII redaction and private AI processing for enterprise-grade security.
SourceCastor EDC: Do I need a programmer to build a study?
No. Case report forms are configured in the browser, which is the main reason academic groups adopt it.
Dovetail: How many integrations does Dovetail support?
Dovetail connects to 38+ external tools through API, CLI and integrations including Slack and Microsoft Teams.
SourceCastor EDC: How long does a quote take?
Castor states a full pricing proposal within five business days of sharing the protocol.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Castor EDC vs Benchling
- Castor EDC vs LabVantage
- Castor EDC vs Sapio Sciences
- Castor EDC vs Medidata Rave
- Castor EDC vs REDCap
- Castor EDC vs Greenphire
- Castor EDC vs Florence eBinders
- Castor EDC vs Genedata
- Castor EDC vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Castor EDC vs LabArchives
- Castor EDC vs Aurelius
- Castor EDC vs Reduct
- Castor EDC vs OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- Castor EDC vs Paperpile
- Castor EDC vs Remesh
- Castor EDC vs Schrodinger
- Castor EDC vs Contentsquare
- Castor EDC vs SurveySparrow
- Castor EDC vs Condens
- Castor EDC vs Marvin
- Castor EDC vs Mouseflow
- Castor EDC vs Attest
- Castor EDC vs SurveyMonkey
- Castor EDC vs Roam Research
- Castor EDC vs NVivo
- Castor EDC vs Scispot
- Castor EDC vs Seven Bridges
- Castor EDC vs Suzy
- Castor EDC vs Terra
- Castor EDC vs TetraScience
- Castor EDC vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- Dovetail vs Benchling
- Dovetail vs LabVantage
- Dovetail vs Sapio Sciences
- Dovetail vs Medidata Rave
- Dovetail vs REDCap
- Dovetail vs Greenphire
- Dovetail vs Florence eBinders
- Dovetail vs Genedata
- Dovetail vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Dovetail vs LabArchives
- Dovetail vs Aurelius
- Dovetail vs Reduct
- Dovetail vs OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- Dovetail vs Paperpile
- Dovetail vs Remesh
- Dovetail vs Schrodinger
- Dovetail vs Contentsquare
- Dovetail vs SurveySparrow
- Dovetail vs Condens
- Dovetail vs Marvin
- Dovetail vs Mouseflow
- Dovetail vs Attest
- Dovetail vs SurveyMonkey
- Dovetail vs Roam Research
- Dovetail vs NVivo
- Dovetail vs Scispot
- Dovetail vs Seven Bridges
- Dovetail vs Suzy
- Dovetail vs Terra
- Dovetail vs TetraScience
- Dovetail vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
