APIs · head to head
Directus vs OWASP ZAP

Directus
APIs
Open-source data platform providing REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Directus free permissive use of the self hosted product is limited to organisations under $5M annual revenue with fewer than 50 employees, so crossing either threshold turns a free dependency into a paid licence; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: Directus covers REST API, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Directus and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Directus
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- Database management
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- SQLite
- Webhooks
- Node.js support
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Directus
- Wrapping an existing SQL database in a REST and GraphQL API with an admin interfacenot OWASP ZAP
- Running a self hosted headless CMS over a schema you already ownnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Directus
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Directus
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Directus
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Directus
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Directus
- Free permissive use of the self hosted product is limited to organisations under $5M annual revenue with fewer than 50 employees, so crossing either threshold turns a free dependency into a paid licence
- The free Core tier is a hard limit of 3 seats, 25 collections and 5 flows
- The Team plan is $499 a month billed annually, or $599 monthly, with extra seats at $50 each
- Team caps collections at 50, expandable to 100, and flows at 20
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Directus
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted Directus
- Community support
- Cloud$25/monthly
- Managed cloud
- Automatic updates
- Backups
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose Directus if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is Directus or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Directus starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Directus or OWASP ZAP?
- Directus starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free.
- Does Directus or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- Directus runs on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use Directus for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Directus best used for?
- Directus is most often used for wrapping an existing sql database in a rest and graphql api with an admin interface, running a self hosted headless cms over a schema you already own. Of those, wrapping an existing sql database in a rest and graphql api with an admin interface and running a self hosted headless cms over a schema you already own are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can Directus do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- Directus covers REST API, GraphQL API, Database management, PostgreSQL. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Directus: What is Directus's pricing?
Directus Core is free and self-hosted. The Team tier costs $499/month (annual) or $599/month (rolling), including 10 user seats and cloud hosting at $99/month additional. Enterprise plans have custom pricing. Additional seats cost $50/month each.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Directus: Can I use Directus for free?
Yes, Directus Core is completely free with 3 user seats, 25 Collections, 5 Flows, AI Assistant, and Advanced RBAC. Self-hosting is available at no cost.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Directus: How many user seats does each Directus tier include?
Core includes 3 user seats, Team includes 10 SSO seats, and Enterprise includes custom SSO seat counts. Additional Team seats cost $50/seat per month.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
Directus: What happens to my monthly Directus plan if I switch?
Monthly plans are grandfathered for six months after switching, and annual plans are honored until renewal. Self-hosted licenses are handled case-by-case at renewal.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
Directus: Is there a free trial for Directus?
No trial period is mentioned. Users can start with the free Core tier immediately without a credit card.
SourceOWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Directus vs Appwrite
- Directus vs Hasura
- Directus vs PocketBase
- Directus vs Sanity
- Directus vs Parse Server
- Directus vs Strapi
- Directus vs Gravitee
- Directus vs Payload CMS
- Directus vs KeystoneJS
- Directus vs Tyk
- Directus vs Asyncapi
- Directus vs Hoppscotch
- Directus vs Pusher
- Directus vs Salt Edge
- Directus vs Skyflow
- Directus vs Yodlee
- Directus vs Backbase
- Directus vs Enfuce
- Directus vs 1Password
- Directus vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Directus vs Norton 360
- Directus vs LastPass
- Directus vs Bitwarden
- Directus vs Burp Suite
- Directus vs Metasploit
- Directus vs Wireshark
- Directus vs authentik
- Directus vs Authelia
- Directus vs Infisical
- Directus vs Trivy
- Directus vs Feedzai
- Directus vs Frontegg
- Directus vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Directus vs JumpCloud
- Directus vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Appwrite
- OWASP ZAP vs Hasura
- OWASP ZAP vs PocketBase
- OWASP ZAP vs Sanity
- OWASP ZAP vs Parse Server
- OWASP ZAP vs Strapi
- OWASP ZAP vs Gravitee
- OWASP ZAP vs Payload CMS
- OWASP ZAP vs KeystoneJS
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyk
- OWASP ZAP vs Asyncapi
- OWASP ZAP vs Hoppscotch
- OWASP ZAP vs Pusher
- OWASP ZAP vs Salt Edge
- OWASP ZAP vs Skyflow
- OWASP ZAP vs Yodlee
- OWASP ZAP vs Backbase
- OWASP ZAP vs Enfuce
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
