Cybersecurity · head to head
Diligent vs Penpot

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Penpot
Developer Tools
Open source design and prototyping platform
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Penpot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.; Penpot smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- They diverge on capability: Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Penpot covers Vector editing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Diligent and Penpot actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
Only in Penpot
- Vector editing
- Interactive prototyping
- Design systems
- Components & libraries
- Real-time collaboration
- SVG support
- CSS Grid & Flexbox
- Code export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Penpot
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Penpot
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Penpot
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Penpot
Penpot
- UI/UX designnot Diligent
- Prototypingnot Diligent
- Design systemsnot Diligent
- Developer handoffnot Diligent
- Open source projectsnot Diligent
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Penpot
- Smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- Self-hosting requires Linux server and Docker knowledge for technical setup
- Real-time collaboration features may have performance issues with very large design files
Pricing, plan by plan
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Penpot
Free- FreeFree
- Cloud-based design
- Real-time collaboration
- Components and variants
- Unlimited$7/month
- All free features
- Priority support
- Advanced cloud features
- Enterprise$950/month
- Custom enterprise features
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Choose Penpot if
- You need vector editing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want interactive prototyping.
Questions people ask
- Is Diligent or Penpot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Diligent starts at On request and Penpot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Diligent or Penpot?
- Penpot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Diligent and Free for Penpot.
- Does Diligent or Penpot run on more platforms?
- Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Penpot runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Penpot for free?
- Yes. Penpot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Diligent starts at On request.
- What is Diligent best used for?
- Diligent is most often used for a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system, an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine, a regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement finding, a group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reporting. Of those, a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system and an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine are not what Penpot is typically brought in for.
- What can Diligent do that Penpot cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management. Penpot covers Vector editing, Interactive prototyping, Design systems, Components & libraries.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Diligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Penpot: Is Penpot really free?
Yes. Penpot is completely free with no feature gates. The open-source version can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure for zero cost beyond server expenses.
SourceDiligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Penpot: Can I self-host Penpot?
Yes. Penpot can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure with no licensing costs. Organizations with specific privacy or governance needs can run Penpot on their own servers.
SourceDiligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Penpot: What are the paid plans if I use Penpot cloud?
Penpot's cloud service offers a free tier, Unlimited plan at $7 per user per month for professionals and medium teams, and Enterprise starting at $950 per month for larger organizations.
SourceDiligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Penpot: What platforms does Penpot support?
Penpot runs in the browser, so it works on Windows, Mac, Linux, and any OS with a web browser. No platform-specific downloads required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs Keycloak
- Diligent vs Soketi
- Diligent vs Visual Studio Code
- Diligent vs Ansible
- Diligent vs Helix
- Diligent vs Bazel
- Diligent vs Eclipse IDE
- Diligent vs Pants Build
- Diligent vs Jitsu
- Diligent vs Notepad++
- Diligent vs Tilt
- Diligent vs Backstage
- Diligent vs StackBlitz
- Diligent vs Steampipe
- Diligent vs WarpBuild
- Diligent vs Webpack
- Diligent vs Avo
- Penpot vs LogicManager
- Penpot vs Resolver
- Penpot vs MetricStream
- Penpot vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Penpot vs Transcend
- Penpot vs OneTrust
- Penpot vs Milestone XProtect
- Penpot vs Camio
- Penpot vs Delinea
- Penpot vs Dahua Technology
- Penpot vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Penpot vs IBM QRadar
- Penpot vs Trivy
- Penpot vs Trulioo
- Penpot vs Unit21
- Penpot vs Veracode
- Penpot vs Very Good Security
- Penpot vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Penpot vs Keycloak
- Penpot vs Soketi
- Penpot vs Visual Studio Code
- Penpot vs Ansible
- Penpot vs Helix
- Penpot vs Bazel
- Penpot vs Eclipse IDE
- Penpot vs Pants Build
- Penpot vs Jitsu
- Penpot vs Notepad++
- Penpot vs Tilt
- Penpot vs Backstage
- Penpot vs StackBlitz
- Penpot vs Steampipe
- Penpot vs WarpBuild
- Penpot vs Webpack
- Penpot vs Avo
