Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Penpot

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Penpot
Developer Tools
Open source design and prototyping platform
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Penpot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Penpot smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Penpot covers Vector editing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Penpot actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 1911 | 2021 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Penpot
- Vector editing
- Interactive prototyping
- Design systems
- Components & libraries
- Real-time collaboration
- SVG support
- CSS Grid & Flexbox
- Code export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Penpot
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Penpot
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Penpot
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Penpot
Penpot
- UI/UX designnot IBM QRadar
- Prototypingnot IBM QRadar
- Design systemsnot IBM QRadar
- Developer handoffnot IBM QRadar
- Open source projectsnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Penpot
- Smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- Self-hosting requires Linux server and Docker knowledge for technical setup
- Real-time collaboration features may have performance issues with very large design files
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Penpot
Free- FreeFree
- Cloud-based design
- Real-time collaboration
- Components and variants
- Unlimited$7/month
- All free features
- Priority support
- Advanced cloud features
- Enterprise$950/month
- Custom enterprise features
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Penpot if
- You need vector editing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want interactive prototyping.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Penpot better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Penpot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Penpot?
- Penpot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for IBM QRadar and Free for Penpot.
- Does IBM QRadar or Penpot run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Penpot runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Penpot for free?
- Yes. Penpot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Penpot is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Penpot cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Penpot covers Vector editing, Interactive prototyping, Design systems, Components & libraries.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Penpot: Is Penpot really free?
Yes. Penpot is completely free with no feature gates. The open-source version can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure for zero cost beyond server expenses.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Penpot: Can I self-host Penpot?
Yes. Penpot can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure with no licensing costs. Organizations with specific privacy or governance needs can run Penpot on their own servers.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Penpot: What are the paid plans if I use Penpot cloud?
Penpot's cloud service offers a free tier, Unlimited plan at $7 per user per month for professionals and medium teams, and Enterprise starting at $950 per month for larger organizations.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
Penpot: What platforms does Penpot support?
Penpot runs in the browser, so it works on Windows, Mac, Linux, and any OS with a web browser. No platform-specific downloads required.
SourceIBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Keycloak
- IBM QRadar vs Soketi
- IBM QRadar vs Visual Studio Code
- IBM QRadar vs Ansible
- IBM QRadar vs Helix
- IBM QRadar vs Bazel
- IBM QRadar vs Eclipse IDE
- IBM QRadar vs Pants Build
- IBM QRadar vs Jitsu
- IBM QRadar vs Notepad++
- IBM QRadar vs Tilt
- IBM QRadar vs Backstage
- IBM QRadar vs StackBlitz
- IBM QRadar vs Steampipe
- IBM QRadar vs WarpBuild
- IBM QRadar vs Webpack
- IBM QRadar vs Avo
- Penpot vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Penpot vs 1Password
- Penpot vs Norton 360
- Penpot vs LastPass
- Penpot vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Penpot vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Penpot vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Penpot vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Penpot vs Recorded Future
- Penpot vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Penpot vs Proofpoint
- Penpot vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Penpot vs Arnica
- Penpot vs Authelia
- Penpot vs Authy
- Penpot vs Baffle
- Penpot vs Beyond Identity
- Penpot vs BeyondTrust
- Penpot vs Keycloak
- Penpot vs Soketi
- Penpot vs Visual Studio Code
- Penpot vs Ansible
- Penpot vs Helix
- Penpot vs Bazel
- Penpot vs Eclipse IDE
- Penpot vs Pants Build
- Penpot vs Jitsu
- Penpot vs Notepad++
- Penpot vs Tilt
- Penpot vs Backstage
- Penpot vs StackBlitz
- Penpot vs Steampipe
- Penpot vs WarpBuild
- Penpot vs Webpack
- Penpot vs Avo
