Databases · head to head
Dgraph vs Fig
Dgraph
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed graph database written in Go, maintained by Hypermode, queried through GraphQL or its own DQL language.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Fig is free; Dgraph starts at $39/mo.
- Where Fig falls short: the standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dgraph and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Freemium), free tier (Yes).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dgraph
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Generated GraphQL API
- DQL query language
- Predicate sharding
- Raft replication
- Distributed ACID transactions
- Written in Go
- Full-text and geo indexing
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Dgraph does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dgraph
- An application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes GraphQLnot Fig
- A knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiationnot Fig
- Recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottlenecknot Fig
- Teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available onenot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dgraph
- Sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change
- Stewardship passed from Dgraph Labs to Hypermode after the original company stopped operating independently, so anyone building on it is betting on a second custodian rather than on the original team's roadmap
- The GraphQL layer is generated and opinionated, so anything it does not express drops you into DQL, which is a second language your team must learn and which no other database speaks
- The community is a fraction of Neo4j's, so operational answers, tuning experience, hiring and third-party tooling are all thinner, and unusual failure modes in a Zero and Alpha cluster leave you reading source rather than a forum
- There is no portable graph standard to migrate to; Cypher, Gremlin and SPARQL are all different query models, so the schema and every query is a rewrite if you later leave, and that cost grows with the application
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
Dgraph
Free- CommunityFree
- Native GraphQL
- Graph queries
- Full-text search
- Cloud$39/mo
- Managed service
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise support
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Dgraph if
- You need apache 2.0 licence.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want generated graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Dgraph or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dgraph starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dgraph or Fig?
- Dgraph starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does Dgraph or Fig run on more platforms?
- Dgraph runs on Linux, macOS, Self-hosted, Web. Fig runs on Web.
- Can I use Dgraph for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dgraph best used for?
- Dgraph is most often used for an application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes graphql, a knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiation, recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottleneck, teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available one. Of those, an application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes graphql and a knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiation are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
- What can Dgraph do that Fig cannot?
- Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence, Generated GraphQL API, DQL query language, Predicate sharding.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dgraph: Is Dgraph open source?
Yes. The current repository is Apache 2.0, which is a permissive OSI licence, and the project is at v25 under Hypermode's maintenance.
Dgraph: Is it really GraphQL?
It serves a generated GraphQL API, which is real GraphQL for clients. Its native language, DQL, resembles GraphQL syntactically but is Dgraph's own language and is not the GraphQL specification.
Dgraph: How does it compare to Neo4j?
Neo4j has the larger ecosystem, Cypher, and far more operational precedent. Dgraph distributes storage across nodes by default and gives you a GraphQL endpoint without writing resolvers. The choice usually turns on whether you need horizontal scale and a GraphQL surface more than you need ecosystem depth.
Dgraph: What does a production cluster look like?
At minimum a set of Zero nodes for coordination and a replicated set of Alpha nodes for data, typically three of each for fault tolerance, which is a meaningfully larger operational footprint than a single graph server.
Dgraph: Who maintains it now?
Hypermode. Dgraph Labs, the original company, no longer operates it, and that change of custodian is the main non-technical risk to weigh.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dgraph vs Neo4j
- Dgraph vs ArangoDB
- Dgraph vs Elasticsearch
- Dgraph vs Couchbase
- Dgraph vs Cassandra
- Dgraph vs FaunaDB
- Dgraph vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Dgraph vs RavenDB
- Dgraph vs ScyllaDB
- Dgraph vs Cockroach Labs
- Dgraph vs DynamoDB
- Dgraph vs Qdrant
- Dgraph vs SingleStore
- Dgraph vs TiDB
- Dgraph vs Tinybird
- Dgraph vs Typesense
- Dgraph vs Valkey
- Dgraph vs CouchDB
- Dgraph vs Sweep
- Dgraph vs Cody
- Dgraph vs Warp
- Dgraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Dgraph vs CodeSandbox
- Dgraph vs GitLab
- Dgraph vs Keycloak
- Dgraph vs Vite
- Dgraph vs Daytona
- Dgraph vs Depot
- Dgraph vs ESLint
- Dgraph vs Helix
- Dgraph vs Refact
- Dgraph vs Restate
- Dgraph vs RubyMine
- Dgraph vs Soketi
- Dgraph vs SonarQube
- Dgraph vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Neo4j
- Fig vs ArangoDB
- Fig vs Elasticsearch
- Fig vs Couchbase
- Fig vs Cassandra
- Fig vs FaunaDB
- Fig vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Fig vs RavenDB
- Fig vs ScyllaDB
- Fig vs Cockroach Labs
- Fig vs DynamoDB
- Fig vs Qdrant
- Fig vs SingleStore
- Fig vs TiDB
- Fig vs Tinybird
- Fig vs Typesense
- Fig vs Valkey
- Fig vs CouchDB
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs GitLab
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Depot
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Helix
- Fig vs Refact
- Fig vs Restate
- Fig vs RubyMine
- Fig vs Soketi
- Fig vs SonarQube
- Fig vs Sourcegraph