Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Vagrant

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, Vagrant covers Box management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Vagrant actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Vagrant
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Vagrant
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Vagrant
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Depot
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Depot
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Vagrant?
- Depot starts at Free and Vagrant at Free.
- Does Depot or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Vagrant cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceVagrant: Is Vagrant free to use?
Vagrant is a free, open-source command-line utility for managing virtual machine lifecycles.
SourceDepot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceVagrant: Does Vagrant offer a paid tier?
Vagrant itself is free. HashiCorp offers a HCP Vagrant Registry with a free tier for use with Vagrant.
SourceDepot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Cody
- Depot vs DigitalOcean
- Depot vs Neon
- Depot vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Depot vs Grafana Cloud
- Depot vs Pulumi
- Depot vs Portworx
- Depot vs Serverless Framework
- Depot vs Podman
- Depot vs Caddy
- Depot vs Rancher
- Depot vs Infracost
- Depot vs Porter
- Depot vs SST
- Depot vs Tencent Cloud
- Depot vs Terragrunt
- Depot vs Thanos
- Depot vs Zeabur
- Depot vs Zipkin
- Vagrant vs WarpBuild
- Vagrant vs Blacksmith
- Vagrant vs Nixpacks
- Vagrant vs Buildkite
- Vagrant vs GitLab CI/CD
- Vagrant vs Namespace
- Vagrant vs Earthly
- Vagrant vs Nx Cloud
- Vagrant vs Dagger
- Vagrant vs Garden
- Vagrant vs Ansible
- Vagrant vs ConfigCat
- Vagrant vs Backstage
- Vagrant vs Bitbucket
- Vagrant vs Claude Code
- Vagrant vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Vagrant vs Cody
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Portworx
- Vagrant vs Serverless Framework
- Vagrant vs Podman
- Vagrant vs Caddy
- Vagrant vs Rancher
- Vagrant vs Infracost
- Vagrant vs Porter
- Vagrant vs SST
- Vagrant vs Tencent Cloud
- Vagrant vs Terragrunt
- Vagrant vs Thanos
- Vagrant vs Zeabur
- Vagrant vs Zipkin

